- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cassandra Lynette Brockett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Razor checks...
> At 03:21 PM 6/21/03 -0700, Cass
I'm just wondering if anyone knows how the razor checks work.
The reason I ask is that I have spamassassin running twice on all messages -
once in a milter and once from the glocal procmail file. I have started to
notice messages that hit on the razor2 check when run from procmail, but not
when r
That would be in the spamass-milter configuration.
You need to run spamass-milter with the "-r" command and give it the level
that you want to auto-bounce the mail in.
If you want to just quarantine mail - then you have to run spamassassin
twice - once from spamass-milter and once from the users
Currently as far as I know there is no web interface built into SA (even in
2.60), however I have written some scripts for use with Postgres and SA to
handle user modifications of the details allowed to be modified by the
systems admin.
At the moment however I still have a little bit of work to do
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cassandra Lynette Brockett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Crosspost] Strange iss
I have seen many entries like this since configuring spamass-milter on my
site (usernames and hosts addresses that count hidden) :-
Jun 3 16:12:16 hotline sendmail[2444]: h53NCEH02444:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=3600, class=-60, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, re
I've got a strange situation here, I have updated to running spamassassin
via spamass-milter with it set to not actually do anything to the message
other than check it and bounce it if it is over a certain score (at the
moment that is set to 50, which should get about 25% of the spam we get
here),
someone else already has done a decent kernel package...).
Regards,
Cassandra
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Byrnand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Cassandra Lynette Brockett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Personally not really liking rhat very much, I'd suggest another OS, but for
stability, so far 6.2 is the most stable of the rhat releases I've played
with, though 7.3 is a good runner up. I'd give 9 a while (read minor
version or two) before trying it on anything but a test machine.
Regards,
- Original Message -
From: "AltGrendel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Getting spamd to start on boot.
> Very valid response, especally for the sys admin that has many boxes to
> maintain. Some people prefer to insta
I'm looking at implementing a milter in sendmail that passes the email
through spamassassin but allows us to reject at mta level if the sa rating
is over a certain level (e.g. 30+ or something like that).
Now, my question is simple - has anyone else got a milter running that does
that? I would ra
I don't see what the problem is here.
I compiled spamassassin via "rpm -tb " to give me
rpm's to install, and spamassassin is controlled via "chkconfig spamassassin
on" and service spamassassin start/stop/restart works fine.
If you are running a rhat box, you really should install all possible
pa
I wouldn't mind seeing this implemented.
There are many a system account that should never "see" email from outside -
dependant upon the site that could include such wonders as root,
administrator, sys, etc... So a blacklist_to line would be rather nice to
get implemented, here we don't generally
Ah... but there is a problem with the agreement to change the information in
the email - basically that it has already been done, but some sysadmins are
either stuck with the old version (software reliability testing procedures
at some companies force sysadmins to stick with older programs that hav
*lol* Thank you, you just made my day... after reading through the previous
diatribes from this list today, I just got your email, and it really made it
worthwhile reading the list :-)
Of course, it would also help if I knew whether or not to report the
apparant bug in the sql coding
Regards
15 matches
Mail list logo
