Re: [SAtalk] Best virus scanner?

2003-09-22 Thread Bob Sully
a good > free virus checker that won't give false positives? So far I've seen > the following URLs mentioned in recent topics here: > > http://clamav.elektrapro.com/ > http://www.hbedv.com/ (not free?) -- ___ Bob Sully - Malibyte Consulting Simi

RE: [SAtalk] New virus posing as Microsoft

2003-09-21 Thread Bob Sully
s-besotten bogus M$ e-mails for the past couple of days. My $0.02US worth -- Bob -- ___ Bob Sully - Malibyte Consulting Simi Valley, California, USA http://www.malibyte.com "Years of dedication, and a natural inclination" - J. Buffett --

Re: [SAtalk] Nigerian, er, Afghani scam

2003-09-11 Thread Bob Sully
t; > couple months ago. The only tests it hit are NIGERIAN_BODY1 and > > US_DOLLARS. We're not using bayes here. > Bayes picks these up nicely. -- ___ Bob Sully - Malibyte Consulting Simi Valley, California, USA http://www.malibyte.

Re: [SAtalk] country code blacklists

2003-08-14 Thread Bob Sully
ious .uk domains > other than my own, 5 that claim to come from .za, and 2321 that come > from .com. > > Judging by this random sample of TLDs, it looks like .ie should be > carefully left unblocked while everything else is blocked; the only less > spam-named TLDs I've found are .gov (

[SAtalk] Just a ???

2003-07-05 Thread Bob Sully
e now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. -- _______ Bob Sully - Malibyte Consulting Simi Valley, California, USA http://www.malibyte.com "Years of dedication, and a natural inclination&quo

Re: [SAtalk] Re: FILTER THIS VIRUS ALREADY!!!

2003-07-05 Thread Bob Sully
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Abigail Marshall wrote: > Tony, that menu is not available in the versions of MailMan > before 2.1, but it IS one more reason that Sourceforge ought > to upgrade to 2.1x for its many mailing lists. > -Abigail -- _______ Bob Sully -

Re[2]: [SAtalk] HELP: Someone is using my domain name to sendspam

2003-07-05 Thread Bob Sully
's coming from the IP that corresponds with the > email address. RBL blacklisting is done based on the IP info in > the headers, not on domain names in the email. > > -Abigail -- ___ Bob Sully - Malibyte Cons

[SAtalk] Sick of spam? Sure am!

2003-06-12 Thread Bob Sully
points) Message only has text/html MIME parts 56 -- _______ Bob Sully - Malibyte Consulting Simi Valley, California, USA http://www.malibyte.com "Years of dedication, and a natural inclination" - J. Buffett

Re: [SAtalk] OT: Nigerian Email Conference

2003-06-03 Thread Bob Sully
Damn, that's funny!! I needed a laugh this morning, work's been nuts! Thanks for the laugh! -- Bob -- -- _______ Bob Sully - Malibyte Consulting Simi Valley, California, USA http://www.malibyte.com "Years of dedication, and a natural inclinatio

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Minor but annoying bug

2002-07-12 Thread Bob Sully
ust thought I'd toss this out > | for discussion. > > I'm not a perl programmer either. Someone needs to put this in > bugzilla, though. (I don't like bugzilla's UI, and I'm not near a > handy web browser, do you want to submit it?) Sure, I'll do

[SAtalk] Minor but annoying bug

2002-07-11 Thread Bob Sully
run as the user, rather than root (this would also get rid of the "falling back to nobody" messages in the logs). I haven't looked through the source, and I'm not a Perl programmer, so will leave the details to the maintainers. Just thought I'd toss this out for discussion.

[SAtalk] Minor but annoying bug

2002-07-11 Thread Bob Sully
not a Perl programmer, so will leave the details to the maintainers. Just thought I'd toss this out for discussion. -- Bob -- Bob Sully Malibyte Consulting Simi Valley, CA, USA www.malibyte.com "Years of dedication, and a natural inclination." - J. Buffett

Re: [SAtalk] Re: (1) User_prefs ignored? (2) Permission problem?(fwd)

2002-07-03 Thread Bob Sully
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:44:11PM -0700, Bob Sully wrote: > > | I had been using the standard call in .procmailrc: > | > | :0fw > | | spamassassin -P > | > | :0: > | * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes > | /home/

Re: [SAtalk] (1) User_prefs ignored? (2) Permission problem? (fwd)

2002-07-03 Thread Bob Sully
be the problem. It's now doing this on both of my mail servers. > > I'd tend to assume the same. > > So tell us how you are calling spamc... > > Olivier -- ___ Bob Sully - Malibyte Consulting Simi Valley, California, USA http://www.malibyte.

[SAtalk] (1) User_prefs ignored? (2) Permission problem? (fwd)

2002-07-02 Thread Bob Sully
he dir itself might be the problem. It's now doing this on both of my mail servers. TIA for any help you can offerBob -- ___ Bob Sully - Malibyte Consulting Simi Valley, California, USA http://www.malibyte.com "Years of dedication, and a natural inclina

[SAtalk] Re: User_prefs ignored?

2002-06-27 Thread Bob Sully
_prefs settings are used or not seems to be > > hit-and-miss. What's in the header often disagrees with waht actually > > happens. For example: > > > > Are you killing the process and restarting it after you make changes to > local.cf or user_prefs? > > I think

[SAtalk] (1) User_prefs ignored? (2) Permission problem?

2002-06-26 Thread Bob Sully
. The directory's permissions (root's home) are root.root 750, so I'm assuming that the fact that "nobody" can't read the dir itself might be the problem. The kicker is, I have 2.30 running on another server with the *exact* same configuration, and there are no such m