Title: SignatureENCH Stationery
Hello,
Does Razor and DCC
do a direct lookup to same database on the internet every time SA scans a
message? Or its storing that database localy somehow.
Thank
you.
Regards,
Zlatko.
Hi Kevin,
Any .cf file will be processed in /etc/mail/spamassassin and
/usr/share/spamassassin. However, you are advised to avoid
/usr/share/spamassassin as an update/upgrade will delete the directory and
install a new - one so any custom rules will be wiped out. The links below
will help you in
At 03:52 PM 11/19/03 -0500, Matt Cramer wrote:
Any string that ends and begins with an "_" will be parsed as a variable.
It was driving me nuts trying to figure out why the url I was putting in
the report linking our users to customized filtering instructions based on
our MUA was not working in any
> -Original Message-
> From: jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:45 PM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] second weeds set
>
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> I agree, it would be nice if there was a way to consolidate,
> and ma
At 07:03 PM 11/18/03 -0500, erin o'brien wrote:
I am not a programmer, so I could not think of any "rule" to catch this
one. I only hope that someone here can. I have gotten quite a few of these
(at least two per day), and it's always from my forged email address from
someone named wilfred or ar
Hi All,
I am creating a Perl script to check a phrase (of plain text) for spam.
I was wondering if anybody could verify my script for me?
Is there a better way to accomplish this?
-- start script --
my $spamtest = new Mail::SpamAssassin ({
...
});
my $mail = "test spam phrase";
my $stat
Hello everyone,
I'm using SA 2.6.1 out of the box and continue to receive 20-100 pieces
of SPAM a day that is obviously SPAM, but for some reason it gets a 4.9
or 4.7 score and is passed through. My score limit is 5.
I receive a lot of "repeat SPAM" where the messages are exactly the same
over a
Hi Everyone,
Thankyou to all of you that offered advice, it was much appreciated.
The problem now appears to be solved. Frederic Tarasevicius gave me a
solution which appears to be working fine.
I will look into MIMEDefang as well as Dave Funk suggested.
Cya's.
--
Regards,
Robert Davidson.
h
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Robert Davidson wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I set up a SpamAssassin system for a company but they alerted me to a
> problem today.
>
> They have content filtering rules to stop people from abusing their
> employees. Basically any e-mails with naughty words are given 50 points
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Marc Steuer wrote:
> Hi list members,
>
> I want to score messages from [SAtalk] with a negative score so examples
> posted to the list won't be tagged as spam. This is my first venture into
> regex and I've tried:
>
> header MY_SATALK Subject =~ /\[SAtal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Chris,
Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 7:56:21 AM, you wrote:
CS> Somtimes, and this may NOT be one of those times, spammers will send
CS> an empty message. At first I thought this was just their stupidity.
CS> But then I thought about it longer.
Bryan:
Whenever I perform a long-running task on my mailserver, I use a handy utility called
'screen'. It allows you to detach from an interactive shell at any time and re-attach
later.
More here: http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/screen.html
--
Chris Thielen
Easily generate SpamAssassin r
At 08:10 PM 11/19/2003, Bryan Hoover wrote:
Just wanted to mention that I'd been trying to clean up a polluted ham
corpus by using 'forget', but I continued to get poor results. Long
story short, I cleaned up my ham, and removed both ham, and spam that
had spambouncer headers - which I assume sa-l
I have been experimenting with rules that will catch periods and pipes
obfuscating text. Attached is my punctuation.cf file. It caught your
example.
* 0.5 -- BODY: MY: Word obfu by periods (a.bcd)
* 0.5 -- BODY: MY: Word obfu by periods (abcde.fghij)
* 0.5 -- BODY: MY: Word obfu by peri
At 01:38 20/11/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
Has anyone else problems with Pyzor? I am getting these, all throughout the
day,
Pyzor: couldn't grok response "66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError: "
I did a "/usr/local/bin/pyzor discover", but to no avail. And I do not have
them blocked on the firewall either.
Hello Matt,
Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 12:47:22 PM, you wrote:
MC> However it seems the latest rounds of Nigerian Scam mails look like
MC> ham to Bayes. All of them are scoring bayes_00, which brings them
MC> below our threshold. I keep feeding copies of it into sa-learn, but
MC> without luc
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Bryan Hoover wrote:
> The reason I mention it - aside from being pleased - is to point out
> that it appears the problem was either the old spambouncer headers, or
> forgetting, wasn't (the latter being what I started out suspecting,
> until I discovered the spambouncer header
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marc,
Wednesday, November 19, 2003, 11:49:08 AM, you wrote:
MS> I want to score messages from [SAtalk] with a negative score so
MS> examples posted to the list won't be tagged as spam. ...
MS> 2. Is there an alternate way to ensure SAtalk me
At 03:25 PM 11/19/2003, Robert Oslin wrote:
My first post to this list. Hope I'm doing this right...
I received a message with invisible fonts, yet the generic
HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE rule wasn't hit.
Was it because the body tag didn't specify a background font, therefore the
text font color had nothi
Hi all,
I recently got around to installing spam assassin 2.60 and getitng it
tunning. My config is a 2.2.16 kernel, with updated perl etc al. packages.
My MTA is EXIM. I have added the exim config changes to internally handle
the mail so I don't have to play with .procmailrc's as follows...
#
I am installing the latest version of
SpamAssassin, 2.60 and ran the CPAN
install procedure. After which I ran the tests against the sample e-mail
messages. Here is the output from my tests. What is the
missing
"get_uri_list", and how do I get the missing function?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] M
I am not a programmer, so I could not think of any "rule" to catch this
one. I only hope that someone here can. I have gotten quite a few of these
(at least two per day), and it's always from my forged email address from
someone named wilfred or arthur.
Thanks.
Original Message -
Jack Coates wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 14:11, J. Burton wrote:
we have spamassassin running our mail server.
i have a friend who is getting a pile of spam to his account at a different
isp (the local telco).
he wants to know if i can do anything about his spam
i have some notion that we sho
Hi Larry,
I agree, it would be nice if there was a way to consolidate, and maybe
there is, I just dont know what the answer is. Actually, that's not
true. I came up with a thought today (I just remembered) and I think I
can scale them down some. I'll mess around and let you know if it
works.
in the README, http://au2.spamassassin.org/full/2.6x/dist/README,
it sez
Learning
Since SpamAssassin now includes a Bayesian learning filter (in version
2.50 on), it is worthwhile training SpamAssassin with your collection of
non-spam and spam, if possible. This will
Spammers now send templates to use... how nice of them!
Subject: Re: %RND_UC_CHAR[2-8], one madman there
Body attached.
770925821296145303
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No more spam.We can help you!<=
/p>
http://%RANDOM_WORD:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/spam=
Just thought I'd share. I don't have access to the rbls so I did a grep on
two day's worth of spam IPs (received: line from mailserver). I have this:
no. spam network
7849 24.0.0.0
6819 68.0.0.0
4723 66.0.0.0
4200 200.0.0.0
3139
Which I'm sure is no surprise to most.
Just wanted to mention that I'd been trying to clean up a polluted ham
corpus by using 'forget', but I continued to get poor results. Long
story short, I cleaned up my ham, and removed both ham, and spam that
had spambouncer headers - which I assume sa-learn
Has anyone else problems with Pyzor? I am getting these, all throughout the
day,
Pyzor: couldn't grok response "66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError: "
I did a "/usr/local/bin/pyzor discover", but to no avail. And I do not have
them blocked on the firewall either.
Thanks,
- Mark
Hey Jennifer,
Just a quick note to let you know that I abondoned my effort to consolidate
your rules. While they worked for the most part, the were not as effective
as yours. I still don't like the lack of effeciency of multiple rules, the
effectiveness can not be beat!
Thanks,
Larry
> -O
You just missed a discussion about a custom rule. If you are not familiar
with custom rules, I suggest some reading and examples:
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/SA-rules-howto.txt
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
http://www.exit0.us/
http://www.emtinc.ne
I added a second Weeds set. R. Menschel pointed out a FP in an email
that he sent with a legitimate string of encoded text. If you would
like to limit the set a bit, you can use the "weeds two" set. I have
been testing it by running it in addition to the original set. This set
will miss a few i
> >to 'pool.com' and/or 'thewizard.net' to solve the problem at the source?
>
> Yes. And without reply...
I had to deal with this on a mailing list of thousands of users. My only
recourse was to write a quick-n-dirty Perl script to run through the
subscriber list and send everyone a very official
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> LOL, the only reason I recognise the name Larry Wall is because of Theo's
> sigs! :)
> I guess I need to go but that book and help support the man.
>
> --Chris Santerre
Mumble Mumble, kids these days, no respect for their elders.
OK, mandatory homewor
That is a downside of alot of site-wide implementations. It is for that
exact reason I went with using amavisd-new, as it doesn't have that
problem. Amavisd-new will break the message into seperate parts
proccesses each seperately I believe. While it doesn't have the ability
built into amavisd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Gregory writes:
>
>I ask again, particularly of the list maintainers, has anyone written mail
>to 'pool.com' and/or 'thewizard.net' to solve the problem at the source?
Yes. And without reply...
- --j.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
I am trying to run a force-expire and getting the following es when
running with -D in sa-learn version 2.60 (perl 5.8 solaris 9)
I get these non-stop until I Ctrl-D out of it...
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt (>) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/UnixLocker.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Guenthner
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Rule for naughty words containing dots?
>
>
> Hi list
>
> Recently I've seen an increase in spam mails like the one below.
> Using SA 2.60 with a spam th
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kai
MacTane
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] AT&T PATENTS ANTI-ANTISPAM TECHNOLOGY
At 11/19/03 10:42 AM , Steve Thomas wrote:
>I read this on TheRegis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 12:08 pm, Chris Thielen wrote:
> To check if it was sent to the list I look for this header:
> X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the best header to check for:
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin
- --
Matt Beland
[EM
At 11/19/03 10:42 AM , Steve Thomas wrote:
I read this on TheRegister.com yesterday. The only reasonal explaination
is that they wanted to make sure that the concept was never put into
practice and they never really intended to use the technique themselves. I
hope...
Well, the article does stat
At 02:49 PM 11/19/2003, Marc Steuer wrote:
I want to score messages from [SAtalk] with a negative score so examples
posted to the list won't be tagged as spam. This is my first venture into
regex and I've tried:
header MY_SATALKSubject =~ /\[SAtalk\]\b/
describe MY_SATAL
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Thanks, I got it now. I updated my evilrules last night, and they tested
> great overnight! I shall post them shortly. This should speed them up
> greatly for everyone! Would this help even more?
>
> /?:\bsomedomain\.com\b/i
>
> would the addition of th
Good article about it. Looks like a good rule or two can be pulled out
of the discussion.
http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1745
Mike
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more pro
I ask again, particularly of the list maintainers, has anyone written mail
to 'pool.com' and/or 'thewizard.net' to solve the problem at the source?
- Charles
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Ken Bass wrote:
> For every submission I keep getting the below bounce / along with
> advertisement. This is quite ir
At 14:22 19/11/2003 -0500, Ken Bass wrote:
For every submission I keep getting the below bounce / along with
advertisement. This is quite ironic on a list dedicated to attacking spam.
And very annoying.
My own personal workaround has been to add that address to my SpamAssassin
blacklist and I su
Title: Negative score for SAtalk messages
I don't even
run them thru SA. I have procmail skip them out of the loop.
You rule
looks fine to me!
-Original Message-From: Marc Steuer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 2:49
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subje
Oh. Silly me, I didn't respond to the original rule question. I made the
same wrong assumption in my obfu rules generator. The problem with the
original rule is the trailing word boundary marker:
\b matches the space between "\w\W" or "\W\w"
the "]" character is \W, so for that rule to match, t
It seems that the list of reserved words that map to variables when using
the report command, such as _SUMMARY_, doesn't actually limit itself to
only the list in the man page.
Any string that ends and begins with an "_" will be parsed as a variable.
It was driving me nuts trying to figure out why
--On Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:46 PM -0500 Michal Wellum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still no joy. The spam being found is not being tagged in the subject
> line. Any help would be appreciated.
How about the headers from one of the meesage, mainly the SA headers -
X-Spam-Status, etc.?
that would be openrbl.org
I opted for a Hot Chocolate after lunch. I should have went with the coffee
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 3:07 PM
> To: 'Michael H. Collins'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtal
The IP in the header:
Received: from jp (w068.z064000153.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.0.153.68]) by
bloomail.mybloo.com
(Vircom SMTPRS 5.3.232) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
hits on opelrbl.org like a raped ape!!
So I would say to you kind sir Reo, SATALK will never leave!
Bayes has been working great. We use it site-wide here, with corpora of
about 20K spams and hams. We used to get anywhere from 4-12 false
positive reports per month, requiring whitelisting (we have about 6K
email users). Now we get none, and I attribute that to Bayes. Nice job,
SpamAss authors,
My first post to this list. Hope I'm doing this right...
I received a message with invisible fonts, yet the generic
HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE rule wasn't hit.
Was it because the body tag didn't specify a background font, therefore the
text font color had nothing to compare against?
Copy of the spam be
At 01:46 PM 11/19/2003, Michal Wellum wrote:
In 10_misc.cf under /usr/share/spamassassin
So, I simply removed the hashes from a couple of lines as follows...
Still no joy. The spam being found is not being tagged in the subject line.
Any help would be appreciated.
1) I'd strongly advise t
Hey Marc,
I use procmail to send SAtalk to a separate IMAP folder
(SpamAssassin-talk), bypassing SpamAssassin. Any email sent to my SATalk
email address but not to the list is checked by spamassassin, then put in
a yet another IMAP folder (SpamAssassin-talk/direct).
To check if it was sent to th
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Martin McWhorter wrote:
> >filters." AT&T says it is re-evaluating the patent and has not decided how
> >it will use the technology.
> >SOURCE: News.com; AUTHOR: Paul Festa, CNET
> >http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5108918.html
> Here is a suggestion: Sue spammers that use techn
Title: Negative score for SAtalk messages
Hi list members,
I want to score messages from [SAtalk] with a negative score so examples posted to the list won't be tagged as spam. This is my first venture into regex and I've tried:
header MY_SATALK Subject =~ /\[SAtalk\
> describe MY_RBDY_INVSTXTMY: Invisible text color
> rawbody MY_RBDY_INVSTXT/ color=("?\#?F[0-9A-F]"?|"?white"?).*>/i
> scoreMY_RBDY_INVSTXT2.0
Just my $0.02, but I'd make it this:
color=("?\#?F[0-9A-F]F[0-9A-F]F[0-9A-F]"?|"?white"
.. spammers will use more than just the l
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Nancy McGough wrote:
> As an alternative, you could try reading the spamassassin mailing
> list via the gmane.org NNTP server and see if the messages show
> up correctly there.
Actually, they show up correctly as soon as I start a reply, so there is
no real problem reading the
Hi all,
I recently got around to installing spam assassin 2.60 and getitng it
tunning. My config is a 2.2.16 kernel, with updated perl etc al. packages.
My MTA is EXIM. I have added the exim config changes to internally handle
the mail so I don't have to play with .procmailrc's as follows...
#
For every submission I keep getting the below bounce / along with
advertisement. This is quite ironic on a list dedicated to attacking spam.
I have a suggestion. I'm not sure what admin capabilities the list
administrators have using the sourceforge lists, but here is my advice:
Modify your mail
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:12:51AM -0800, Harold Hallikainen is rumored to have said:
>
> AT&T PATENTS ANTI-ANTISPAM TECHNOLOGY
> ...
I read this on TheRegister.com yesterday. The only reasonal explaination is that they
wanted to make sure that the concept was never put into practice and they ne
filters." AT&T says it is re-evaluating the patent and has not decided how
it will use the technology.
SOURCE: News.com; AUTHOR: Paul Festa, CNET
http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5108918.html
Here is a suggestion: Sue spammers that use technology to bypass filters
for patent infringement.
--
FWIW, I noticed some interesting Reply-to: addresses in these.
That combined with a very reasonable looking From:, led me to
believe they were trolls for "I'm so sorry" replies from folks
trying to help the hapless email user who sent an empty email.
That is, an attempt to validate that a human is
No, You leave...
Is this spam of some new form?
Reo wrote:
leave
--
Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy
It's us against them. Ride like you stole it!
http://linuxlink.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Progr
AT&T PATENTS ANTI-ANTISPAM TECHNOLOGY
Critics ponder why AT&T would patent a technology that thwarts antispam
filters. The technology operates as a "system and method for counteracting
message filtering," according to its patent awarded on Nov 4. "Why is
AT&T
inventing and patenting a method for e
leave
On 19 Nov 2003 Charles Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, David B Funk wrote:
> > Based upon the headers of your message, it looks like you're using pine
> > v4.05.
>
> My apologies. I keep forgetting that my Pine is on an *ancient* Solaris
> system, and not the reasonbly up-
Is there a way to determine if there is a problem with
the servers razor uses (such as an announce list or network status). Do
people find the razor (cloudmark) servers do not always accept spam
reports?
I've been getting
Nov 19 12:19:47.329814 report[2920]: [ 5] Connecting to
folly.cloudmark.c
Here is the latest on my SARE:
www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/evilrules12c.cf
They should run faster now! They are now bound!
Sorted by this hit file:
www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/evil2.txt
*NOTE*
I've kind of hurt future evilrules updates. I've implemented spamhaus.o
Replying to the whole thread, but I had to grab an actual message to reply to.
ISTR some time ago talk about a RBL for hosts referenced inside emails, instead
of just the sending ips. Seems like that would be ideal, especially if we go
based on DNS name as well as ip address. So if we get a mess
Hi
all, im having a small issue with SA creating new user dirs and user prefs
files.
Here is
my startup /bin/spamd --daemonize --username=virtual
--virtual-config-dir=/usr/local/virtual/%d/%l --nouser-config -s spamd -L -a
&& echo -n ' spamd'
I
want it to run daemonized and to use p
Hi list
Recently I've seen an increase in spam mails like the one below. Using
SA 2.60 with a spam threshold of 5 they are not tagged. Does anyone
already have a rule for stuff like that?
Thanks in advance
Ralf G.
psasi oosxa kmemjitw qsjvq ddblplv
Just take V.l.A.G.R.A.X-DS about 15 minutes to
--On Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:22 PM +1100 Robert Davidson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I set up a SpamAssassin system for a company but they alerted me to a
> problem today.
>
> They have content filtering rules to stop people from abusing their
> employees. Basicall
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, David B Funk wrote:
> Based upon the headers of your message, it looks like you're using pine
> v4.05.
My apologies. I keep forgetting that my Pine is on an *ancient* Solaris
system, and not the reasonbly up-to-date mail server. Unfortunately, the
(expletive) thing is so heav
Create a negative scoring rule for word docs.
*Note* we don't post negative rules to the net.
HTH
-Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Need help with a simple
> -Original Message-
> From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:57 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: ML-spamassassin-talk
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Sanity checking new uri rules?
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> > > > uri
Somtimes, and this may NOT be one of those times, spammers will send an
empty message. At first I thought this was just their stupidity. But then I
thought about it longer. It could be an attempt to get a few negative AWL
points.
Just an idea to throw out there.
--Chris "oops I top posted again!
I guess I missed something. When did SAproxy stop having a free edition?
Does the demo expire after 15 days? I'm bummed there is no longer a free
version for home users if this is so :(
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/goril
Thanks Larry !
on 11/19/03 9:51 AM, Larry Gilson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Is this the proper way to do this?
>>
>> bodyWHITE_FONT /font color=\"#ff\"/i
>> describeWHITE_FONT Uses White Font Tag
>> score WHITE_FONT 5.000
>
>
> The body check will preprocess the
Hey Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: MIKE YRABEDRA
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 8:55 AM
> To: SPAMASSASSIN
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk]
>
>
> on 11/17/03 3:13 PM, Michael Weber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I've had a rule filtering out that font color for several
>
> > mont
Michael Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had a rule filtering out that font color for several months
> with no complaints. I tag it with the description "Spammers
> favorite color" ;-)
That should already be caught by HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE in SA
2.60, unless it's against a nonwhite backgro
on 11/17/03 3:13 PM, Michael Weber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've had a rule filtering out that font color for several months with no
> complaints. I tag it with the description "Spammers favorite color"
> ;-)
Is this the proper way to do this?
bodyWHITE_FONT /font color=\"#ff
At 06:09 PM 11/19/03 +0800, Patrick T. Tsang wrote:
From the maillog, I have checked that spamd has successfully filtered the
mail at first.
However, spamd only check email using the last email address found in the
mailling list and check against the user-defined rules in Mysql.
That is, it skips t
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Larry Gilson wrote:
> Most of you guys can get over my head quickly.
Read, learn, and exceed us. :-)
> This sounds a lot like the squidGuard blacklist implementation. You start
> with a base text file - one each for domains, urls, and regex. It is up to
> each the a
Hello,
I am trying to put all user-defined rules in Mysql.
It is working fine until I find a problem.
>From the maillog, I have checked that spamd has successfully filtered the
mail at first.
However, spamd only check email using the last email address found in the
mailling list and check against
Justin Mason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> "Samuel Murez" writes:
>> Matt Kettler wrote:
>>> At 01:12 AM 11/18/03 +0100, Samuel Murez wrote:
Hello--
Could somebody please take just a minute to tell me how to do this
?
It seems very
Hi everyone,
I set up a SpamAssassin system for a company but they alerted me to a
problem today.
They have content filtering rules to stop people from abusing their
employees. Basically any e-mails with naughty words are given 50 points
and are stuffed into quarantine.
The below rule is cau
89 matches
Mail list logo
