How can I add points for messages with empty bodies?
Assume the Lines: header is unreliable.
Please CC me if you reply.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See
I use RBL checks along with a bunch of rules in sendmail.mc to reject
mail. In addition to all of that, I also use a couple of services that
automatically updates the access database (/etc/mail/access.db), plus I
have a bunch of entries in /etc/mail/access that I've added myself. What
I did w
Matt,
Which directory is preferred in choosing a location for custom cf files,
/etc/mail/spamassassin or /usr/share/spamassassin? I would like to
understand the answer from both a technical and personal point-of-view.
Thanks,
Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler
> At 03:30
At 03:30 PM 10/9/03 -0700, Robert Leonard III wrote:
Here is a newbie question.. how would I implement those rules? Can I put
them in my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory, or put them someplace else? Do
I have to reference them in some way, or by them being in the right place
are they automatically
Hi,
Just before upgrading to the new 2.60 Release, I read through
to documentation to see what has changed. But some things are
not clear to me. Maybe someone's able to bring some light to me?
http://eu.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#network%20test%20opti
ons
| trusted_networks
I'm using spamassassin 2.60-1 packaged for Debian. Various pieces of
the documentation seem contradictory on the use of user preferences by
spamd.
README says
- $USER_HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
User preferences file. If it does not exist, one of the
default prefs file from above w
Hi Jennifer,
I have rules to match character sets also but my format is a bit different
and thought I would share them.
Character set DEC: 61-126
# Obfuscate text by using ISO 8859-1 character set DEC encoding
rawbody MY_RBDY_OBFU_ISOD /&\#(6[5-9]|[7-9][0-9]|1[0-1][0-9]|12[0-6])\D/
describe MY
Hi Robert,
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Leonard III
>
> Here is a newbie question.. how would I implement those
> rules? Can I put them in my /etc/mail/spamassassin
> directory, or put them someplace else? Do I have to reference
> them in some way, or by them being in the righ
> Can I use Bayes? I had assumed not, since I have no mailboxes on the system
> and all mail simply passes through to the Exchange Server..
>
> Am I out of luck with Bayes, or am I missing something obvious?
>
I do that w/Bayes and it works great. :-)
Only thing that you lose seems to be the abil
Philip Tucker writes:
> I'm trying to run the GA against my corpus of mail to see how much improvement I can
> get from the new rule weightings. A couple questions:
>
> 1) The documentation says a large corpus is necessary. How large are we talking?
> 1000? 10,000? 1,000,000 messages?
Hi
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:14:34PM -0500, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > Mike Van Pelt writes:
> > >This is nuts. I'm going to have to back out 2.60 tonight
> > >if I can't get this resolved today. (Which I really hate
> > >to do; 2.60 does seem to catch more spam.)
>
> I've noticed that the way b
Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What test does "RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED" refer to?
Bonded Sender - www.bondedsender.com
It's a publicly-accessible whitelist designed to cut down on false positives.
Basically you post a bond to guarantee that you won't send any spam, and
they put your server's IP a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> a friend of mine wants to deploy SpamAssassin with Sendmail on the
> MTA level. MIMEDefang or milter-spamc/miltrassassin/spamass-milter
> are possible solutions.
> The problem is to restrict Spam Tagging for only some addresses :
> messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should not
Title: GA question
I'm trying to run the GA against my corpus of mail to see how much improvement I can get from the new rule weightings. A couple questions:
1) The documentation says a large corpus is necessary. How large are we talking? 1000? 10,000? 1,000,000 messages?
2) The docume
Title: GA Question
I'm trying to run the GA against my corpus of mail to see how much improvement I can get from the new rule weightings. A couple questions:
1) The documentation says a large corpus is necessary. How large are we talking? 1000? 10,000? 1,000,000 messages?
2) The docume
I have a linux box running SA 2.60, QMail, Qmailscanner that is a mail proxy
for my Exchange server.. SA tags the mail, and forwards it on to my exchange
server...
Can I use Bayes? I had assumed not, since I have no mailboxes on the system
and all mail simply passes through to the Exchange Server
Here is a newbie question.. how would I implement those rules? Can I put
them in my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory, or put them someplace else? Do
I have to reference them in some way, or by them being in the right place
are they automatically applied?
Sorry for the ignorance, but I'm willing t
Brad wrote:
body MOON /moon/i
score MOON5.0
I'm not positive, but I think the "describe" line is also necessary.
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and
C
Chris S. is going to be posting these on his site when he gets time, and
I believe he was also waiting on my tweaks. I have tweaked to the best
of my ability, which is scarce. :) I will post these now since there
was some discussion on catching tidal waves of hidden tags obscuring
known spam wor
> PLEASE tell me if there are any mistakes or FP's. There should not be, but
> after 1758 lines at 3 times, my brain gets a little goofy :-)
>
It looks great! Thanks! I did notice it was full of ^M characters, tho.. I
stripped them out. :)
> PS: 50% of the Internet lists users think Top Posting
In the message below, I have substituted the word "moon" for the male organ
waker upper drug. If I use the V word it'll be blocked.
I have a RH9 mail server and have done a default installation of SA 2.6. It
appears to be working as I am getting 75% of spam marked as *SPAM*
However, I
Stéphane,
Your subject is misleading; MTA level does not mean with SA, it means with a
Sendmail/Postfix/Amavisd-new/MIMEDefang etc. configuration.
You could always create rules to subtract points from everyone except those users:
header TO_NONSAUSER ToCc !~ //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i/i
describe TO
Well I got around to updating my evilrules.cf file. Ummm.are you sitting
down? The first version had 274 rules for spam hosts. This version has 1758
rules!! Yup! I went thru it by hand 3 times before running the reg2ule.pl
script. I also posted a link to the 'evil' file that created these rules
However, it sucks for dreadful typists like me :-)
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Tom Satter wrote:
> Have there been any suggestions that one of the rules be something like
> "percentage of mis-spelled words" in the text section? In particular,
> a high score on this would remove most of the problems seen
Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] deploying SpamAssassin on MTA level for only some
> recipient addresses
>
>
>
> Hi,
Amavisd-new can do that.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] deploying SpamAssassin on MTA level for only some
recipient addresses
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Mike Carlson wrote:
> Anyone have problems getting spamstats to return numbers for the spam counts? Tha
> faq on gryzor's website is of little help.
[...]
> Oct 9 13:17:41 altair spamd[31462]: identified spam (8.7/5.5) for root:1002 in 4.7
> seconds, 3405 bytes.
> Oct 9 13
Have there been any suggestions that one of the rules be something like
"percentage of mis-spelled words" in the text section? In particular,
a high score on this would remove most of the problems seen below. If
the site could configure SA to use aspell with a given set of dictionaries
that were
At 12:25 PM 10/9/2003, Eric Vollmer wrote:
My question is, what is the threshold for subject/body text like V(A)G1NAS
or C()CKS to actually
invoke a score to be added to the overall score?
There is no static rule in the current ruleset that will ever add score for
those particular phrases. Howev
Summoning the hermit out of her cave huh? ;) yeah I'll give a hand.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:40 AM
To: 'VonEssen, John'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Phrases I have modified
I have some notes o
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:19:23AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> Mike Van Pelt wrote:
>
> >It's still having spells of rejecting connections as
> >"it's busy" when CPU is less than 50%.
> >
> >(This is on a Solaris box.)
> >
> >
> Are you running MIMEDefang with the multpilexor? If so, have you
Fabiano Bonin wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:56:29 -0300:
> maybe the spammers will remove our addresses
> from its lists, and the traffic will decrease.
>
No, no, no, don't count on this, really :-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.co
wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:36:34 +0200 (CEST):
> so ppl, if sy meet this problem and solved it, please reply
>
No, I haven't, but it really doesn't look like a spamd problem. spamd is
only one of several victims of this.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Intern
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:34 PM
> To: Matt Kettler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] tag vs deleted spam w/ SA
>
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> > Is there a lis
Hi,
a friend of mine wants to deploy SpamAssassin with Sendmail on the MTA level.
MIMEDefang or milter-spamc/miltrassassin/spamass-milter are possible solutions.
The problem is to restrict Spam Tagging for only some addresses :
messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should not be scanned but [EMAIL PROTE
it's not the nice way to do it but if you are trying to get rid of spam
from a particular source you can set a firewall rule with ipf/iptables
etc to reject smtp connections from the ip address and it will never
make it to the mail daemon let alone the mail queue for processing.
David Rodgers
On
I get email from a person that is routinely mis-identified as spam:
X-Originating-Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Person's name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FAKED_HOTMAIL_DAV,
FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_40_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_NO_CHA
Anyone have problems getting spamstats to return numbers for the spam counts? Tha faq on gryzor's website is of little help.
I just get this:
File /var/log/maillog : from Oct 9 00:00:00 to Oct 9 13:15:00Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 0Number of spams
Why don't you try Amavisd-new? You wouldn't have the problem of waiting
for SA before incoming email gets accepted.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Van Pelt
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:20 PM
> To: Mike Van Pelt
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 *VERY* slow.
>
>
>
> Mike Van Pelt writes:
> >This is nuts. I'm going to have to back out 2.60 to
maillog shows -
Oct 9 13:21:07 spamd1 spamd[31846]: hit max-children limit (10):
waiting for some to exit
top shows -
31846 root 9 0 21372 20M 2148 S 0.0 2.7 0:34 spamd
30880 root 9 0 21372 20M 2148 S 0.0 2.7 0:00 spamd
30990 root 9 0 21372 20M 2148 S
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Fabiano Bonin wrote:
[...]
> If there was a way to reject the spam in the mail server (returning the
> rejection to the sender), maybe the spammers will remove our addresses
> from its lists, and the traffic will decrease.
>
> Is this step possible? If yes, where can i find mo
Hello everyone.
I just wanted to get some feedback regarding my particular setup with
postfix and SA.
Right now, I have a mail gateway server on my DMZ. Its running OpenBSD 3.3,
Postfix-2.0.16 and SpamAssassin 2.55, as well as spampd (which is working
great BTW).
I've setup SA on the gateway
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:19:00PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> While it is possible to reject at SMTP time, it is unlikely to get you
> off of most spam sources, since they don't care about bounces or
> having clean lists. Also, by the time you do this, you've already
> wasted your bandwidth to
I don't think there is a test that specifically looks for those words with
the parentheses. You might have to write your own test. Of course, if your
running Bayes, these kinds of words are picked up as spamish by Bayes over
time.
cheers,
Colin
Colin A. Bartlett
Kinetic Web Solutions
www.kineticw
A rule for this already exists, it's called: OBFUSCATING_COMMENT
If you like, you can give this test a higher score in your local.cf file.
No, the rules are not additive!
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Robert Wagner wrote:
> We seem to be getting more messages like:
Fabiano Bonin wrote:
> BUT, in my particular point of view, spam generates 2 big problems:
>
> 1 - Lots of crap in our mailboxes
> 2 - Lots of internet traffic
>
> Today, SpamAssassin is solving problem number 1 greatly, but problem
> number 2 is unsolved, since i will continue to receive all thi
There isn't
any rule to catch this particular one. However here are 2 hot off the
press!
body
MY_MTPARENS /\(\)/describe MY_MTPARENS Empty parens found.score
MY_MTPARENS .44
body
MY_CHARPARENS /[a-zA-Z]\([a-zA-Z]\)[a-zA-Z]/describe MY_CHARPARENS
Char(char)Charscore MY_CHARPARENS .70
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:13:29PM -0400, Jean-S?bastien Guay-Leroux wrote:
> I want to know which 15 tokens the Bayes engine used to calculate the final
> Bayes Score. I also want to know what is the score of those 15 tokens.
run with -D to get the token list, "sa-learn --dump data" to get the
t
Mike Van Pelt writes:
>This is nuts. I'm going to have to back out 2.60 tonight
>if I can't get this resolved today. (Which I really hate
>to do; 2.60 does seem to catch more spam.)
It could be doing bayes rebuilds for some reason -- try
running "sa-learn --rebuild" before starting SpamAssassin
> "FB" == Fabiano Bonin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FB> If there was a way to reject the spam in the mail server (returning the
FB> rejection to the sender), maybe the spammers will remove our addresses
FB> from its lists, and the traffic will decrease.
While it is possible to reject at SMTP
Check the archives -- there may be a sendmail hook to do this.
I know for a fact you can do this with Exim via the sa-exim patch.
(sa-exim.sf.net)
A similar postfix project was discussed a month or so back. I believe
a sendmail one was too.
On Thursday, October 9, 2003, at 10:56 AM, Fabiano
>>
Of course, I probably am wrong about part, and possibly all, of this.
>>
That is the funniest thing I heard all week.. Thanks for the SMILE..
Thanks,
Todd Routhier
Lightwave Technologies, LLC.
--
ISP Board
http://www.ispBoard.com
ISP Information Exchange
Start Your Own ISP!
http://www
> "R" == Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Is there a list for amavisd-new? Someone here might know the answer,
>> but if not, that'd probably be the better place to ask.
R> Yes I've asked the question on the amavisd-new mailing list and looked
R> over the amavisd-
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 tagged_above=0.0 required=6.3
It hasn't been marked as spam it just had those tests run on it that's all.
-Original Message-
From: Thiago Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Outbook 2
Hi list,
I want to know if there is a way, or a patch to spamassassin,
to get a little bit more information about the scoring of a SPAM/HAM with Bayes.
I want to know which 15 tokens the Bayes engine used
to calculate the final Bayes Score. I also want to know what is the score of
Mike Van Pelt wrote:
It's still having spells of rejecting connections as
"it's busy" when CPU is less than 50%.
(This is on a Solaris box.)
Are you running MIMEDefang with the multpilexor? If so, have you tried
raising the maximum number of allowed connections?
---
Hi,
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:56:29 -0300 Fabiano Bonin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using SpamAssassin sice yesterday and i put it in production today,
> site wide.
> It's amazing.
> It's filtering 95% on my daily messages, and all blocked messages are
> really spams.
>
> BUT, in my particula
A little background on my mail system, my internet facing mail servers
are postfix 1.1.12 which
passes mail to amavisd-new for spam scanning. Once the spam check
is done it passes it to
our Symantec AV Gateway for virus scanning, also munges the headers from
the original smtp
transaction. Once
What test does "RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED" refer to?
And for future reference where can i find out about
other test results? I checked on the default tests
site but a search revealed nothing.
Thanks,
/KRM
--
"UNIX was not designed to coddle the weak."
--Fyodor
keyserv
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:15:29AM -0500, Robert Wagner wrote:
> We seem to be getting more messages like:
> GIRLS T
> HAT RE
See what the OBFUSCATING_COMMENT test in 2.6x and 2.5x does.
--
(Mr.) Hannu Liljemark | Appelsiini Finland Oy | http://appelsiini.com
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:35:08PM -0400, Matt Chapman wrote:
> I am trying to get my MimeDefang/Spamassassin/Sendmail relay
> box to filter inbound mail but not filter outbound... On
> top of that, attach a footer to mails that are destined
> outbound only.
One way besides $RelayAddr (or whatev
Thanks Chris!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:59 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - HTML and Line Breaks
>
>
> You are correct. MK (I think
Title: Message
Hi,
I'm seeing to many messages marked as spam and there're not. Looking
further I found that all messages came from users using Outlook 2003 (office XP
2003)
Looking in the headers :
X-Mailer:
Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-Spam-Stat
This is nuts. I'm going to have to back out 2.60 tonight
if I can't get this resolved today. (Which I really hate
to do; 2.60 does seem to catch more spam.)
Other things I have done:
Put the MIMEDefang directory on ramdisk.
Turned on MIMEDefang queueing with a depth of 10.
It's still having s
I am using SpamAssassin sice yesterday and i put it in production today,
site wide.
It's amazing.
It's filtering 95% on my daily messages, and all blocked messages are
really spams.
BUT, in my particular point of view, spam generates 2 big problems:
1 - Lots of crap in our mailboxes
2 - Lots of i
Thiago,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2553
adam
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 11:22, Thiago Lima wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing to many messages marked as spam and there're not.
> Looking further I found that all messages came from users using
> Outlook 2003 (office X
You are correct. MK (I think) has a rule like this submitted to the Emporium
and it hits just like you described. I don't know of anyway around this.
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
"A little nonsense
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:56:29AM -0300, Fabiano Bonin wrote:
> I am using SpamAssassin sice yesterday and i put it in production today,
> site wide.
> It's amazing.
> It's filtering 95% on my daily messages, and all blocked messages are
> really spams.
>
> BUT, in my particular point of view, sp
Hold on a little while. I've seen a set of rules that will knock your socks
off on these. They are VERY nice, and are being tweaked as we speak. Hand
crafted rules by another rule addict. They will "pop"-up soon ;)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper
http://www.mercha
Hi,
I am using spamassassin 2.60 with qmail-scanner-1.16 and qmail-1.03 and
vpopmail.
The smtp-port is opening qmail-scanner and spamassassin iss caled by
qmailscanner.
The Spam-Mails are marked as spam by the X-Spam-Status Email-header. This
works. But the subject is not rewritten.
my /etc/
We seem to be getting more messages like:
GIRLS THAT RE
I was curious if Spamassassin would catch these with a rule like:
body LOTS_REMARKS /\b\b/i
describe LOTS_REMARKS HTML Lots of Remarks
The other question is-> Are the rules additive? Such that i
I fixed this by lowering the scores of my RBL checks. I still use RBLs
but none of them have a score of more than 1.0
-Jim
-Original Message-
From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:41 AM
To: Scott Harris; SpamAssassin-Talk list
Subject: RE: [
I have some notes on these as well. I think it would be great to put on the
wiki! Or maybe I'll just make a separate cf file on "remove me" phrases.
I'll try to get that started today. I am s far behind in work it isn't
funny. However I did get to go to a great sushi bar in Manhattan yesterday!
For some reason I can't get spam reporting to work from this account. Razor
is installed and the Razor2 patch is install in perl but still no luck. I
tried Googling on the main error messages and only found someone else with the
same problem but no answers. SA is finding spam and kicking it out
I am seeing some wierdness with Subject rewriting. I have done google
searches and through the mail list archive and seen nothing so I will
ask here.
We use spamassassin sitewide in our company. We scan the messages and
then they are sent to the end user with the subject tag [SPAM!]
to sort as th
I disabled RBL checks because valid Cable/DSL users in DHCP pools would
use their valid mail servers but trip the DHCP pool RBLs based on the
first IP address in the received chain. I believe this is a bug though;
it shouldn't be checking the very first IP address under those
circumstances.
Chris
I once came up with a partial solution to this problem.
I used a bunch of dictionaries to find letter pairs that did not show up.
Granted it's possible for these to cause FP's due to uncommon abbrevations
and other oddities, but they work good for me!
Maybe if the regex was modified to check if th
Hi ppl!
i've been using spamassassin for about a month. but i've some problem with
it.
here is a log:
Oct 8 17:33:23 ircnet spamd[25867]: connection from
localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 4158
Oct 8 17:37:35 ircnet spamd[6705]: info: setuid to nobody succeeded
Oct 8 17:46:01
Nice site Nancy!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Nancy McGough
> On 8 Oct 2003 Jonathan Vanasco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Nope. None of those.
> >
> > It was for 1 person, cost like $25 a year, and left people enroll a
> > domain then manage multiple aliases to handle oversp
Hello folks.
I'm a newbie to SA, so please be kind. :-)
I want to be able to install SA for personal use on my ISP's web server
(linuxwebhost.com) which is running "Red Hat Linux release 7.3
(Valhalla)".
This is as far as I have gotten:
% perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=~/sausr SYSCONFDIR=~/saetc
the
After getting everything to compile, and installed, I did the following
test as suggested in the USAGE document:
spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out
and got this error:
Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method
Sys::Hostname::SYS_gethostname() is deprecated at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i
Hi
I have spamassassin working with MySQL fine.
If there is no user in the DB that spamassassin is checking the mail for
it seem to take a long time to do the check say 7 seconds for the test
email. If there is config for a users in the DB it takes under a second
for the test email.
Is there any
> I'm using SA 2.6 spamd/spamc
>
> I'm using it in a very loaded server, I get arround 2 mail connections
> per second.
> I want to know if there are people having this kind of load, or even
> bigger, cause I don't think this should be a big load for the server.
>
> The server is Pentium III 1 g
I turned mine off today for just that reason. A lot of the legitimate
mailing lists were being blocked. Unfortunately now I'm starting to see the
opt*, lf* and ls* coming back. After a week of testing I'm VERY please to
not have to add those to my site RBL, but very dissatisfied with dropping
le
Hi,
I am trying to get my MimeDefang/Spamassassin/Sendmail relay box to
filter inbound mail but not filter outbound... On top of that, attach
a footer to mails that are destined outbound only.
I have the server currently relaying mail inbound to exchange servers
and filtering fine. I have a
I turned mine off today for just that reason. A lot of the legitimate
mailing lists were being blocked. Unfortunately now I'm starting to see
the opt*, lf* and ls* coming back. After a week of testing I'm VERY
please to not have to add those to my site RBL, but very dissatisfied
with dropping le
You can put the configuration commands for white/blacklists directly in your
local.cf file or into any other .cf file you place in the
/etc/mail/spamassassin directory. There is also a usr/share/spamassassin
directory that contains .cf files that you can modify but bear in mind that
these files wil
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 23:17, Hannu Liljemark wrote:
> http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq02.006.htp
Fix worked fine. Thanks.
Kristian
--
Kristian Köhntopp, NetUSE AG, Dr.-Hell-Straße, D-24107 Kiel
Tel: +49 431 386 435 00, Fax: +49 431 386 435 99
-
David B Funk wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Tim B wrote:
Yes I have.. that was the first thing I tried... it still thinks when
there's just one other host that the host is trusted.
Havn't seen that one, sounds like a true bug.
I guess I will open a bugzilla request then.
thanks for th
I have been using SA for a long long time now and upgraded to 2.60 this
week.
I cannot figure out where to put my hard coded white/black lists now.
I use spamd/spamc and I know it reads the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file because
I can change the score and it shows up after a restart.
SA is
All the documentation for version 2.60 says that autowhitelist is turned on
by default and that by default the autowhitelist is stored in each users
config directory (e.g. ~/.spamassassin/autowhitelist)
When I installed spamassissin, it installed with no problem and is doing a
great job of filt
Okay
After the input from everyone here is what I found out.
MY white/black lists would not work in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf in
any
way shape or form.
I tried putting them into the users_prefs file everywhere it may have wanted
it.
I tried putting them in 60_whitelist.cf and when I did sp
Jan Erik Skogsholm wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:04:55 +0200:
> Oct 8 16:31:17 nospam kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 10665 (spamd).
>
Don't know if there is a connection, but look at the thread
Subject: [SAtalk] spamd grabbing LOOTs of memory
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
G
Stephen Bradley wrote on Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:45:42 -0400:
> BUT, if I put my black/white list entries in that file or any other file in
> the SA directories
> it will not work. None of the entries are read.
>
You *did* restart spamd, did you?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web
Maybe you can give us more info about what's not working about it. Do you
mean that is just skips the whitelist config settings? One thing you can do
is run spamd with the -D option and view the debug output. It will tell you
what it's doing with the message as it processes it. Maybe that will help
On 8 Oct 2003 Jonathan Vanasco ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Nope. None of those.
>
> It was for 1 person, cost like $25 a year, and left people enroll a
> domain then manage multiple aliases to handle overspammed addresses.
>
> Can't remember the name -- the closest thing to it i've found is
> sim
So based on recommendations from the list, I am now using learn to journal
for updates in 2.60. I decreased the max_size to half, and it seems to be
running every couple of hours, which is acceptable. Thanks again for all the
suggestions.
bayes_learn_to_journal 1
bayes_journal_max_size 51200
Hello !
This happen some time and what can I do to avoid this.
I have to reboot the computer.
Jan Erik
Oct 8 16:31:17 nospam kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 10665 (spamd).
Oct 9 02:15:09 nospam kernel: (scsi0:A:1:0): Locking max tag count at 64
Oct 9 08:03:51 nospam kernel: Out of Memory
99 matches
Mail list logo
