Hi List.
For some reason my user prefs file keeps disappearing.
Has anyone else had this problem?
Any pointers in the right direction would be appreciated.
"Failed to create default user preference file //.spamassassin/user_prefs"
Regards,
Tom Kinghorn
--
So this means we cannot run multiple sessions?
I'm running SA 2.6 spamd/spamc, and getting this same error log.
I'm receiving about 2 mail connections to the mta per second, so I have
sometimes about 20 spamd processes running, that's my top because I have
only 512 mb of ram.
So, I need to run m
Dan Wilder wrote:
If they're all using totally great NFS implementations with locking that
works and all, you might not get any databases truncated or damaged.
As far as nfs implementations go Sun's(the inventors of nfs) have by far
the best server/client in my opinion. I've used various nfs
I turned mine off today for just that reason. A lot of the legitimate
mailing lists were being blocked. Unfortunately now I'm starting to see the
opt*, lf* and ls* coming back. After a week of testing I'm VERY please to
not have to add those to my site RBL, but very dissatisfied with dropping
le
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> [...]
> > I'd like to know the receiver domain (hello.com in the example) and load
> > or do something to use the specific setting for "hello.com".
> >
> > Is it possible? how ? IS there an another way ?
>
>
> if i got u correctly, yes, is possible:
>
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, O-Zone wrote:
> Hi all,
> here's my problem, AGAIN ! I've checked perms into /usr/share/spamassassin and
> are all owned by spamfilter user. This is my startup command:
>
> /usr/bin/spamd -a -C /etc/mail/spamassassin/ -d -u spamfilter -m 10
It may still be a permissions proble
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Tim B wrote:
> Problem in spamassassin 2.60 -- trusted relay
>
> There seems there might be a glitch in the detection of trusted relays
> which is causing RBL checks to be bypassed.
>
> Is there a way to bypass the autodetection of trusted relays and use
> only ones specified i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> Our locking code is NFS-safe. However IMO I'd say it's very slow over
> NFS... bayes dbs are *big* and pretty much random-access.
In theory, it's safe. In practice, it's slow and ... ?
Daniel
---
T
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues? I thought i read
> somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
> with no probs.
>
> anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
>
> I am running 2.6 FYI.
Read the fo
Do you mean http://www.death2spam.com/ ?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier
> Sounds like Postini. Or Messagelabs. postini dot com or
> messagelabs dot com.
>
> Messagelabs is using a modified SpamAssassin, iirc.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jonathan Vanasco
Problem in spamassassin 2.60 -- trusted relay
There seems there might be a glitch in the detection of trusted relays
which is causing RBL checks to be bypassed.
Is there a way to bypass the autodetection of trusted relays and use
only ones specified in a .cf file? I searched bugzilla and didn'
I am trying to figure out what the best method is for using per user
filtering rules with Spamd and Horde's SAM.
I am currently using a Postfix > Amavisd-new > Postfix architecture, but
this does not provide for per user spamassassin filtering with SAM.
Is it possible to filter incoming message
Anyone know if saProxy (Windows) has been made to work with any of the
extended network tests (Razor, etc.)? It seems like combining the
capabilities of saProxy, and something like SpamPal, which checks DNSBL
lists, would be powerful tool.
Bob
---
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, O-Zone wrote:
> Hi all,
> here's my problem, AGAIN ! I've checked perms into /usr/share/spamassassin and
> are all owned by spamfilter user. This is my startup command:
>
> /usr/bin/spamd -a -C /etc/mail/spamassassin/ -d -u spamfilter -m 10
>
> and this is an header of a SPAM m
Are others having the degree of disatisfaction with the RBL check that I
am. It seems that seeminly legitimate sites are being tagged as relay's.
Like comcast.com or net and many others that I would not think were
allowing relaying. I am about to turn it off or at least lower the score.
Doug
***
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Christian Ista wrote:
[...]
> I'd like to know the receiver domain (hello.com in the example) and load
> or do something to use the specific setting for "hello.com".
>
> Is it possible? how ? IS there an another way ?
if i got u correctly, yes, is possible:
whitelist_from [E
Sounds like Postini. Or Messagelabs. postini dot com or messagelabs
dot com.
Messagelabs is using a modified SpamAssassin, iirc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Vanasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 5:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk
At 05:06 PM 10/7/2003, Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
I haven't found a real answer in the archives...
What is the cause of this error:
Cannot open bayes databases /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock
failed: File exists
And is there a solution?
The normal cause of that error is two SA processes tryi
Does a .lock file exist in your $ENV{%HOME%}/.spamassassin dir?
Delete it.
It's probably left over from a connection that was killed before SA
could delete the LOCK file.
I had this happen when I was running multiple instances and killed one
of the instances.
I'd check it while no one is access
Jim Ford wrote:
> t/spamd_hup.t84 50.00% 3-5 8
> Failed 1/40 test scripts, 97.50% okay. 4/303 subtests failed, 98.68% okay.
> Ideas, anyone, please?
This is most probably the problem described in
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2505
Essentially, your mac
Dan Wilder writes:
> If they're all using totally great NFS implementations with locking that
> works and all, you might not get any databases truncated or damaged.
Our locking code is NFS-safe. However IMO I'd say it's very slow
over NFS... bayes dbs are *big* and pretty much random-access.
-
I remember seeing a while back an anti-spam email-only host.
It had a crazy name, and worked like this:
you have your mx point to their machine, and webmail/imap handles
multiple aliases so you can track/monitor/disable
it was something like $25 a month, including domain -- anyone remember
thi
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:27:29PM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> Dan Wilder wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:54:07AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>I thought i read somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS
> >>>
> >>>
> >>with a netapp filer with no > probs.
> >>
Dan Wilder wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:54:07AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
I thought i read somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS
with a netapp filer with no > probs.
I'm doing it -- no problems to report.
With things writing to the same db from different hosts
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:06:22PM -0400, Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
> What is the cause of this error:
> Cannot open bayes databases /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File
> exists
> And is there a solution?
It means the lock failed. It's normal with autolearning since you
may have mul
Hi Daniel!
You were so right about my ISP filtering my mail. I have a site I can go to
to approve/disapprove mail to be forwarded to me. There were about 10 emails
there - all from people posting to this group!
I "loosened" the filters a notch or two!
David
On Mon, 06 Oct 2003, Daniel Quinlan
I haven't found a real answer in the archives...
What is the cause of this error:
Cannot open bayes databases /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File
exists
And is there a solution?
Thanks,
Jeff
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://
Malte S. Stretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm... I didn't notice that warning about an "uninitialized value"
> in the output you gave. That looks weird, like bug 2491 [2] which was
> fixed for
> 2.60-final.
Done. bug report # is 2561.
--
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:54:07AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> > I thought i read somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS
> with a netapp filer with no > probs.
>
> I'm doing it -- no problems to report.
With things writing to the same db from different hosts?
--
I'm fairly new to SA and I'm also fairly confused
There's a couple of issues that I need help with, based on what I'm
seeing in the logs. I think they're all related:
1. "Still running as root"
2. cannot write to ~/.spamassassin/bayes_journal
3. bayes expire_old_tokens: lock:490 cannot creat
> I thought i read somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS
with a netapp filer with no > probs.
I'm doing it -- no problems to report.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
On 10/07/03 11:25 AM, SpamTalk sat at the `puter and typed:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred I-IS.COM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >What we need is a Distributed fake replier
>
> Actually you just need to have the program spoof the origination
> address and craft the IP packets/t
Hello,
> One way I can think of is if you use spamd/spamc, you can have
> procmail figure out which domain the message is for. Create a
> non-login user account, complete with home directory and a user_prefs
> file, per domain. When you call spamc, use the -u parameter to cause
> it to run the
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:55:52PM +0200, Frederic Goudal wrote:
>
>
> >anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues?
>
> Where could be the problem ?
> >I thought i read
> >somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
> >with no probs.
>
> What is a netapp filer
I have not been able to resolve this one. I am still getting these messages
identified as spam. spamc results in the same score from the logs and does
not show the whitelist effecting the score at all. spamassassin --lint does
not show any error messages and other wise SA is identifing tons of o
When I run spamstats I dont get any output for message count. This is all I
get:
altair# /usr/local/bin/spamstats.pl -number=5 -file=/var/log/maillog.2.gz
File /var/log/maillog.2.gz : from Oct 4 00:00:00 to Oct 5 00:00:00
Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 0
Number of spams
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:43:01AM +0300, Kai Risku wrote:
> debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 75% of max: 112500
> debug: bayes: token count: 161438, final goal reduction size: 48938
> debug: bayes: First pass? Current: 1065075477, Last: 1065043573, atime: 0,
> count: 0, newdelta: 0, ratio: 0
-Original Message-
From: Fred I-IS.COM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>What we need is a Distributed fake replier
Actually you just need to have the program spoof the origination address and
craft the IP packets/timing so that it does not need the response that do
not show up. But again, we
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 10:55, Frederic Goudal wrote:
> >anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
>
> I do, it works. Or maybe I don't see the problem.
Among other things, NFS has been known to have file-locking issues. This can cause
problems with multiple processes accessing the DB
At 05:11 PM 10/7/03 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo SA-List,
why does it give permanently autolearn=no?
This is an header from the sa-list.
I think this must autolearn=ham
--snip
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00,DE_PLING_03,
DE_PLING_04,MANY_EXCLAMATIONS,PLING_PLING
>anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues?
Where could be the problem ?
>I thought i read
>somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
>with no probs.
What is a netapp filer ?
>anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
I do, it works. Or maybe I
When spamassissin gets invoked by procmail, I get the following in the
procmail log file:
.
.
procmail: Locking "/home/footoo/spamassassin.lock"
procmail: Error while writing to "/usr/local/perl/bin/spamassassin"
procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data failed
procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data faile
Hallo SA-List,
why does it give permanently autolearn=no?
This is an header from the sa-list.
I think this must autolearn=ham
--snip
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00,DE_PLING_03,
DE_PLING_04,MANY_EXCLAMATIONS,PLING_PLING autolearn=no
version=2.60
--snap
anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues? I thought i read
somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
with no probs.
anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
I am running 2.6 FYI.
thanks
adam
-
At 03:31 PM 10/7/03 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote on Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:16:04 -0400:
> If you're using it, disable bayes and see what happens.. Bayes is a very
> heavy memory consumer and could be a significant portion of the problem.
> Disabling it will at least help clarify if i
At 10:37 AM 10/7/03 -0400, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
I am creating my own RBL (http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs) and
need guidance on creating the actual db. Does anyone have a sample rbl
db they can send me or direct me to a url?
RBLs are served as DNS zones and not as ordinary databases..
www.blackholes.us has ISC-BIND format zone files you can download.
FP
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:37, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
> I am creating my own RBL (http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs) and
> need guidance on creating the actual db. Does anyone have a sample rbl
> db they can send me or
On 2003-10-07 16:23:36 +1300, Nick Jenkin wrote:
> What would i need to stick in the user_prefs file, to delete all emails
> detected as spam?
RTFM: http://tinyurl.com/q0z7
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5, 283
I am creating my own RBL (http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs) and
need guidance on creating the actual db. Does anyone have a sample rbl
db they can send me or direct me to a url?
Thank you in advance
Jennifer Fountain
---
This sf.
At 11:20 AM 10/7/03 +0200, Christian Ista wrote:
Is it possible? how ? IS there an another way ?
No, SA doesn't even reliably know who the recipient is, period. It doesn't
see the message envelope, so it has to guess from the headers. It also
doesn't support any direct kind of re-config.
However
Chr. von Stuckrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 06:29:17PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
QMAILQUEUE="/usr/local/bin/spamassassin -P" export QMAILQUEUE
...
but the messages are not delivered. The logs says "unable to exec qq".
Is eem to remember, that the QMAILQUEUE-Variable do
At 04:06 PM 10/7/03 +, O-Zone wrote:
Hi all,
here's my problem, AGAIN !
First, run spamassassin --lint
If there are any complaints about your configuration files, fix them. Minor
typos can cause bad side effects.
If that doesn't help.. try running a message through SA with the debug
output
Thanks for the help on this everyone.
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 9:16 AM
> To: Jeffrey Wheat
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 Problems
>
>
> under X-Spam-Level: i only see 6 stars, whi
Anyone know if saProxy (Windows) has been made to work with any of the
extended network tests (Razor, etc.)? It seems like combining the
capabilities of saProxy, and something like SpamPal, which checks DNSBL
lists, would be powerful tool.
Bob
---
Hi all,
here's my problem, AGAIN ! I've checked perms into /usr/share/spamassassin and
are all owned by spamfilter user. This is my startup command:
/usr/bin/spamd -a -C /etc/mail/spamassassin/ -d -u spamfilter -m 10
and this is an header of a SPAM mail NOT filtered:
===
Matt Kettler wrote on Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:16:04 -0400:
> If you're using it, disable bayes and see what happens.. Bayes is a very
> heavy memory consumer and could be a significant portion of the problem.
> Disabling it will at least help clarify if it's bayes database size
> related, or someth
Nick Jenkin wrote:
What would i need to stick in the user_prefs file, to delete all emails
detected as spam?
I would not do this if I were you. What happens if a legitimate message
gets deleted? Better to let the end-user make this call, IMHO. OTOH, you
may consider deleting spams with scores o
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 11:20:19 +0200 (GMT+02:00)
Christian Ista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is it possible in the configuration file :
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
>
> to know the receiver domain and load specific configuration (whitelist, blacklist,
> )
>
> Example :
> [EMAIL
under X-Spam-Level: i only see 6 stars, which means the number was
probably 6.99 something, and got rounded to 7 in the email, but didnt
actually hit the required 7.0
adam
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:01, Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
> I am seeing problems with 2.60 on a FreeBSD
> server, using exim as my mt
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:01:29AM -0400, Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
> I am seeing problems with 2.60 on a FreeBSD
> server, using exim as my mta. Emails are
> being tagged as having the required hits
> but are not being tagged as spam. Here is
> a header. Help would be appreciated.
FYI, I just added an
6 asterisks indicates it's not quite 7.0. Probably 6.9something. You
could add up the scores to verify if you really like, but that's what's
happening.
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=7.0 required=7.0
tests=BAYES_10,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED
On 2003-10-07 09:01:29 -0400, Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
> I am seeing problems with 2.60 on a FreeBSD
> server, using exim as my mta. Emails are
> being tagged as having the required hits
> but are not being tagged as spam. Here is
> a header. Help would be appreciated.
[...]
> X-Spam-Level: **
>
I am seeing problems with 2.60 on a FreeBSD
server, using exim as my mta. Emails are
being tagged as having the required hits
but are not being tagged as spam. Here is
a header. Help would be appreciated.
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from squerkle.cetlink.net ([209.198.2.7
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 06:29:17PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> QMAILQUEUE="/usr/local/bin/spamassassin -P" export QMAILQUEUE
...
> but the messages are not delivered. The logs says "unable to exec qq".
Is eem to remember, that the QMAILQUEUE-Variable does not
contain a program's 'call' but ON
Hello
Is it possible in the configuration file :
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
to know the receiver domain and load specific configuration (whitelist, blacklist,
)
Example :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (protected domain)
I'd like to know the receiver domain (hello
65 matches
Mail list logo
