On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:42:02PM -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
> New machine... dual 1.2Ghz AMD CPU's, 1 Gb RAM, Ultra-SCSI-3 (160Mbps) drive:
Single Duron 1.3GHz CPU, FreeBSD 4.8: some stats for Sept. 11, 2003:
Total analyzed :827
Average analysis time :
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:46:37PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I.E. feed it back in?
yes.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Could this be the best day of my life?
-- Homer Simpson
Homer the Heretic
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
It's possible, but when I go to the place Gentoo specifies to pick
up the build
http://www.spamassassin.org/released/
there's a set of 2.60 files there -- but now that I look at the page, the
dates on them are earlier than either rc3 or rc4.
Don't know what's up with that, but as far as I can te
At 10:36 PM 9/11/03 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
a SPAM message being learned as HAM?
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-rc4 (1.203-2003-08-29-exp) on
lerami.lerctr.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
Ich werde ab 12.09.2003 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
13.09.2003.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht(en) nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
mfg
I will answer after returning to the office.
Regards
Wolfgang Fuertbauer
---
This sf.net email i
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:35:14 -0400 Theo Van Dinter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:36:51PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
a SPAM message being learned as HAM?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=ham version=2.60
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:36:51PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> a SPAM message being learned as HAM?
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
> autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc4
BAYES_* doesn't affect autolearning (or else it would get into a feedback
cycle). H
At 08:52 PM 9/11/03 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote:
So I have 2 files: /home/dick/.spamassassin/user_prefs and
/home/jane/.spamassassin/user_prefs
It does not even touch those user_prefs files (checked it with the -D
option)
Well, you've never told spamc to use jane or dick's userid.. so it's going
Creede Lambard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all, new to the list, so apologies if this has already been covered.
>
> I upgraded my version of SpamAssassin from 2.55 to 2.6 this morning, turned
2.60 is not yet released. Perhaps it was one of the release candidates?
Daniel
-
a SPAM message being learned as HAM?
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-rc4 (1.203-2003-08-29-exp) on
lerami.lerctr.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc4
MIME-Version: 1.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello:
I just subscribed to this and have not had the time to check the archives yet,
so I hope you will forgiven. I have been using Spamassassin ver. 1.3x to the
latest 2.6 with Kmail using two simple filter rules one to limit the size to
25 by
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.tar.gz
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.zip
rpmbuild -tb --target=athlon Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.tar.gz
is now not possible to do non rooted :/
rc2 worked :-)
%install failed
---
Hi James,
> Has anyone written a script that run sa-learn through an IMAP folder?
Yes. Try this one:
$ cat trainbayes
#!/bin/bash
sa-learn --no-rebuild --ham --dir /home/mail/amavis/maildir/.ham/cur/
sa-learn --no-rebuild --spam --dir /home/mail/amavis/maildir/.spam/cur/
sa-learn --rebuild
--
I guess I should start from the top.
Originally I installed SA through the spamassassin way, not through spamd
(originally) I have changed to spamd because of the speed.
I have a site-wide config in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
I have it set to various things. The required_hits is 6.0.
I
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 05:17:24AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> rpmbuild -tb --target=athlon Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.tar.gz
>
> is now not possible to do non rooted :/
building non-root works fine for me. in fact I just ran that command
and it worked fine.
what RPM version are you using, an
At 09:42 PM 9/11/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote:
New machine... dual 1.2Ghz AMD CPU's, 1 Gb RAM, Ultra-SCSI-3 (160Mbps) drive:
1) exactly what comands do you launch spamd with?
2) what exact command are you executing to process your messages in this
test and time them? If spamc isn't part of the ans
primary mail server running qmail has the following for local deliver
instructions (other items related to qmail processing not shown):
/usr/bin/spamc -u pop3 -d 65.161.2.8 -p 1783
this tosses the message to the dual AMD/spamd server set up with:
#!/bin/sh
exec \
/usr/bin/spamd -a -m 100 -u pop
Ich werde ab 12.09.2003 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
13.09.2003.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht(en) nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
mfg
I will answer after returning to the office.
Regards
Wolfgang Fuertbauer
---
This sf.net email i
I launch it from the spamd, then postfix uses the spamc to filter.
my options i have ./spamd -d -c
the user_pref's file I am trying to get to work is in the
~username/.spamassassin/user_prefs
the ~username is a username listed in passwd's home dir for that user.
- Original Message -
Pick it up from:
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.tar.gz
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.zip
md5sums:
41e4e3f6a01e0fb104119c9b403cc7b4 Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.tar.gz
8aaa1066d0819a9d88649c4e70bab63a Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc4.zi
Hello all, new to the list, so apologies if this has already been covered.
I upgraded my version of SpamAssassin from 2.55 to 2.6 this morning, turned
it on, and started watching the mail log when obvious spams started appearing
in my mailbox. At first I thought it was only spam that was being for
At 08:03 PM 9/11/03 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote:
my options i have ./spamd -d -c
No.. what entries are you trying to put into the user_prefs itself that
aren't working?
If it's a rule, well then read the manpage.. rules are ignored in
user_prefs when using spamd for security reasons.
If it's so
New machine... dual 1.2Ghz AMD CPU's, 1 Gb RAM, Ultra-SCSI-3 (160Mbps) drive:
first number time second number msg size
16.0 66395
2.7 5884
2.1 1456
6.8 1519
5.0 1307
4.5 1436
4.5 1436
7.6 1367
2.7 1367
1.5 3504
8.6 1374
3.5 1421
2.3 1319
7.5 1519
2.0 1485
8.5 1367
6.7 5319
4.0 2
I am getting 1 sec with my single athlon 700. strange yours is so high.
Sep 11 20:05:45 euphoria spamd[15378]: clean message (-0.5/5.0) for
spamfilter:666 in 1.0 seconds, 3558 bytes.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Farber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
At 04:33 PM 9/11/03 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote:
I am having difficulty, and was wondering if anyone can shed some light on
the subject.
I can't get spam assassin to read any user_prefs file.
it works with the local.cf just fine.
What settings are you trying to put in user_prefs?
How do you launch S
At 23:31 9/09/2003 -0500, David B Funk wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jim wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 12:18:10AM -0400, Debbie D wrote:
> > 3 times today I noticed the server running very high loads of 4-6 and as
> > high as 10, normally I run 1% or lower usually closer to .3-.6%.
Three days
>
Well, I got one of these today also (though it purportedly came from
some boggart in the United Arab Emirates who has esophageal cancer
(couldn't happen to a nicer spammer!))...anyway, it only scored a 4.0,
and I'm running 2.55 with Bayes on (adequately trained).
-- Bob --
On Thu, 11 Sep 200
Hi James,
> -Original Message-
> From: James Herschel
> What I'm asking is:
> 1. Is the lack of a message-id header an accurate measure of spam?
> 2. Is this a rule in SpamAssassin? I haven't seen it in any reports
The Message-Id is an optional field. From what I have seen from posts ov
Consider the following spamassasin setup:
auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 4.99
auto_learn_threshold_spam 5.0
(that is: auto-learn from *every* message)
Messages identified as spam are saved (by procmail) in a "spam"
mbox. All others go to the inbox.
Whenever I see (in my inbox) a message that
Has anyone written a script that run sa-learn through an IMAP folder?
James
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mai
Matt Tencati writes:
> We receive lots of SPAM that is addressed to several users at our site some of which
> are
> old and basically spam traps. I'd like for that message to be tagged as spam for all
> users not just for the spamtrap delivered email.
>
> Does this make sense and if so is anyone
I wrote a quick and dirty hack script to count the number of rules that match
in a Spam or Ham file. There are probably better reporting tools. There are
probably better ways to do this, as well. The output is comma-delimited, you
can import into Excel or similar for sorting, further processing.
Hi Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Covington, Chris
> This is what I'm now using w/Postfix (should work for any MTA):
>
> header NO_RDNS Received=~ /\(unknown[ ]\[/
> describe NO_RDNS Sending MTA has no reverse DNS
> score NO_RDNS 2.5
>
> header NO_RDNS2 Received=~ /\(\[.*\]\)/
> de
I am having difficulty, and was wondering if anyone can shed some light on
the subject.
I can't get spam assassin to read any user_prefs file.
it works with the local.cf just fine.
is there something i've missed?
thanks in advance.
---
Th
Hello Carlo,
Thursday, September 11, 2003, 4:35:22 AM, you wrote:
CW> Ok, I re-learned most of it :/
CW> Does anyone have an idea why it can happen that
CW> this database loses its content?
I don't know but I have the same problem. It seems to
happen when my bayes_toks file reaches about 5k.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Steve Thomas wrote:
>
> This may not be new, but it's the first one I've seen... It only scored 2.513 on my
> company's mail server which runs a CVS version of 2.60 from a couple months ago. The
> only tests it hit are NIGERIAN_BODY1 and US_DOLLARS. We're not using bayes he
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Since there isn't a standard for received headers, no rule will work
for
>Everyone...
>MS Exchange:
>Received: from mail.magenta-netlogic.com ([192.168.1.2]) by
ireland.local.mnl
>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
>
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Steve Thomas wrote:
> This may not be new, but it's the first one I've seen... It only scored
> 2.513 on my company's mail server which runs a CVS version of 2.60 from a
> couple months ago. The only tests it hit are NIGERIAN_BODY1 and
> US_DOLLARS. We're not using bayes here
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Ken Gordon wrote:
> I just noticed the following in a spamassassin report. I thought 2.60
> (which I think I am running) didn't use this test. Am I wrong? Should I
> be zeroing it in local.cf?
grep -i OSIRU *
in /usr/local/share/spamassassin returns no matches on my system, a
I actually received something very similar in our fax machine last week.
Hmm.Faxassassin!
:-)
--Chris "Not Howdy Doodey" Santerre
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtal
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:03:02PM -0700, John Schneider wrote:
> Please forgive me if this is already answered in the list archives. But, if
> it is, I didn't find it:
cd ${WHEREYOUUNPACKEDTHESOURCE};
find . -name 'README*' -print;
cat ${FILETHATLOOKSRELEVANT};
--
Scott Lambert
Another idea would be to block the mail servers at the IP level using
iptables. At least for a few days. This is of course only useful if all
the mail you are seeing is coming from a certain server or a certain
group of servers.
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 23:18, Debbie D wrote:
> 3 times today I notice
I would for sure set this one to zero since Osirusoft is defunct for the
time being
-Original Message-
From: Ken Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM still in SpamAssassin version
2.60-rc3
This may not be new, but it's the first one I've seen... It only scored 2.513 on my
company's mail server which runs a CVS version of 2.60 from a couple months ago. The
only tests it hit are NIGERIAN_BODY1 and US_DOLLARS. We're not using bayes here.
---
I just cought an FP where the SUBJ_HAS_SPACES rule gave 3.5 points. My
local.cf has no reference to this rule, but I did find it in
50_scores.cf: SUBJ_HAS_SPACES 2.425 2.026 1.101 2.329. Where is the 3.5
coming from? I need to lower this score right away.
X-Mail-Format-Warning: Bad RFC2822 head
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 08:40:54AM -0600, Ken Gordon wrote:
> I just noticed the following in a spamassassin report. I thought 2.60
> (which I think I am running) didn't use this test. Am I wrong? Should I
> be zeroing it in local.cf?
2.60 was using it until osirusoft went belly-up. it's no lon
This is what I'm now using w/Postfix (should work for any MTA):
header NO_RDNS Received=~ /\(unknown[ ]\[/
describe NO_RDNS Sending MTA has no reverse DNS
score NO_RDNS 2.5
header NO_RDNS2 Received=~ /\(\[.*\]\)/
describe NO_RDNS2 Sending MTA has no reverse DNS
score NO_RDNS2 2.5
--
I just noticed the following in a spamassassin report. I thought 2.60
(which I think I am running) didn't use this test. Am I wrong? Should I
be zeroing it in local.cf?
RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.9 points) RBL: Received via a relay in
relays.osirusoft.com
[RBL check: found 31.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> It's actually quite a good spam sign, but you I don't think
> you can get that information From the MTA (I used to block on
> it for a while, which had only a handful of FPs in over 6
> months... A way to assign poin
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 12:28:48PM -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote:
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> This is the statement I have in my list:
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] xnote.com
>
> but it isn't working. do i have the syntax right?
>
> where [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my email address.
Ok, I re-learned most of it :/
Does anyone have an idea why it can happen that
this database loses its content?
When running the same mail again with debugging
turned on, I see the following:
debug: bayes token 'HX-Qmail-Scanner-1.16:header' => 0.970436474139029
debug: bayes token 'HX-Qmail-Scann
It would be nearly impossible for every message to take the same path,
unless you close off your mail server to only itself. There is a
possibility that someone's relay is also using SA _before_ outbound
relaying. This could be an ISP or company/organization who is running
outbound message th
I'm running successfully SpamAssassin (spamd) on a freeBSD VPS.
However when I try to train SpamAssassin with sa-learn I get the following error:Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CmdLearn.pm in @INC
I should also mention I had to patch spamd with the following instructions:
http://www.perlcode.org/t
> -Original Message-
> From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 September 2003 02:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > I've noticed that Columbia University has an SA rule for no
> > reverse D
Hi,
I'm using exiscan with spamd, and recently it's stopped working. I've been
trying to get dcc working with spamassassin, but gave up - so I'm assuming that's what
has caused it.
Running spamd in debug mode I get:
debug: all '*From' addrs: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debug: running head
I'm not sure I'm following you on this one... Mail does go through the same
path - i.e. it's going to the same user account on the same server. And as
for the other point, who else could be filtering for spam ? Definitely not
the spammer, right ? and on the server, all mail do go through the same
p
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Alastair Battrick wrote:
> I'm having a problem installing SA 2.55
>
> The server is running Redhat 7.2 (I think) has 256Mb RAM and plenty of spare
> disk space.
>
> When I go to cpan, I can get and make Mail::SpamAssassin no problems, but
> when I 'make test' I get this:
[sn
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:59:39AM -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> All -
>
> I have a client with a Red hat 9 + SA 2.55 + spamass-milter server in
> front of a Lotus Notes server. The client has hired a Notes developer
> to give their users an extra button in Notes to forward false negatives
> to
58 matches
Mail list logo
