That's what I get for not double-checking before I put my foot in my
mouth. S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is right.
It looks like you've got a 10-second timeout, and it's taking longer
than that. Are you doing RBL checks? If so, you may be timing out on
ORBS, which recently went offline.
I was s
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Dan McDonald wrote:
> Stuart Gall writes:
>
> > Is SA Proxy different to pop3proxy ? I use pop3proxy very
> > successfully with windoze clients.
>
> SAProxy is the new name for pop3proxy. It's available as a binary
> build, and the source is now in CVS.
>
> Jack Gostl writ
--On Saturday, June 07, 2003 1:10 PM -0700 "L. Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Remember when I was looking for why my email filters had broken...well
turns out fetchmail occasionally gets confused by the extra 10-15 lines
(depends on message) that their "email guardian" inserts into
the header:
Hi,
I manage a couple of SA site servers at multiple locations. Is it possible to have a
second local.cf file?
The primary local.cf is used by the local users at each site.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Damian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
You did help me notice a mistake I did make. I changed
to sendmail.mc to: "S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and don't
get any startup errors anymore. But now get the
following in the logs when a message is received:
Jun 7 21:30:24 homer spamd[47769]: connection from
localhost.spacelynx.com [127.0.0.1] a
Per the sendmail doc it's [EMAIL PROTECTED], although for
kicks I tried what you suggested and got the error:
51 4.0.0 /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: line 1257:
Xspamassassin: unknown socket type localhost: Protocol
not supported
--- Patrick Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "S=unix:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
"S=unix:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" doesn't really make much sense for a socket name. You probably want "S=localhost:12000"
Gerald Raynor wrote:
I seem to have everything configured properly but I
think I'm missing a small step somewhere in
starting/running spamassassin.
The process seems to be running b
Has anyone come across this error, in syslog? I'm running the latest
Spamassassin and Razor, almost looks like the perl net::dns isn't
installed but as far as I can tell, it is...
Thanks,
spamd[13409]: razor2 check skipped: Transport endpoint is not connected
Died at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5
I seem to have everything configured properly but I
think I'm missing a small step somewhere in
starting/running spamassassin.
The process seems to be running but sendmail either
doesn't like it or doesn't see it. However, when I run
the sample.pl against sendmail.cf it test fine. Below
are the st
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Give this one a look:
> > http://www.stearns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html#autoreporting
>
> I've got an inexplicable problem with that. One one machine it works
> just fine, on my other box, i get in ~spamtrap/.procmail/proclog:
>
> From
Nix said:
> On Fri, 06 Jun 2003, Kai Schaetzl uttered the following:
> > Jonathan Vanasco wrote on Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:21:43 -0400:
> >
> >> what about the random stuff?
> >
> > I think this is specifically included for confusing Bayes.
>
> No, spams with piles of ordinary email pasted onto the
On Fri, 06 Jun 2003, Kai Schaetzl uttered the following:
> Jonathan Vanasco wrote on Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:21:43 -0400:
>
>> what about the random stuff?
>
> I think this is specifically included for confusing Bayes.
No, spams with piles of ordinary email pasted onto the bottom are for
that. The ra
You'll get about 99%, maybe more, of what mail-abuse.org catches by using
wirehub -- er easynet. We use both at the office and on the average day we
get about 50,000 emails, wirehub blocks about 15000 of those, and maps rbl
get about another 300 and maps rss gets about another 5 after that.
300 s
Along the lines of the previous user's complaints, regarding filtering.
My ISP instituted a spam filter Amika-Guardian(?). Before they rolled it
out they said we'd be able to turn off the filtering -- what they didn't
tell you was that you could only turn off spam filtering, not all filtering.
It
> Yup - download the source and perform a manual install, just like you
> did with pop3proxy. Better documentation on how to do this is needed.
Where do I get that?
Thanks.
--
Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sp
--On Friday, June 06, 2003 11:40 PM -0400 Weyland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll pay a hundred dollars a month for hosting if I get good results and
speed (I need to send millions of emails a day) from the machine.
Wow, what a deal.
---
This
It's the legal hoops they have been forced to jump through. It really
only take a few minutes to fill out and the dns lookups stop a lot of
spam
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Jim Ford wrote:
> I've contacted mail-abuse.org with the intention of registering as a
> hobbyist/individual user. The registr
Norton SystemWorks 2003 Software Suite Professional Edition Five Feature-Packed Utilities, One Great Price A $300 Combined Retail Value for Only $38.95!!
*
***
Norton AntiVirus 2003 (retail $49.95) -- Norton AntiVirus is the world's most trusted anti-virus solution. The sad fact is
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Jim Ford wrote:
> Now I've got SA working well (thanks NG!), I'd really like to do
> something to hit or at least cause some inconvenience to spammers,
> rather than just passively dump spam. Devin Carraway's Sugarplum spam
> poisoner look an interesting option, does anyone use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jerry,
Friday, June 6, 2003, 6:59:39 PM, you wrote:
JB> I've come up with lots of custom rules as of late, ... Please give me
JB> comments as to whether you find them to be accurate/useful.
Running them against my personal corpus of 3k spam an
On Saturday 07 June 2003 09:09, Jim Ford wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've contacted mail-abuse.org with the intention of registering as a
> hobbyist/individual user. The registration requires that you download and
> print off two copies of a pdf file to fill in and send off by snail-mail -
> 22 sheets of A4 t
Hi,
I've contacted mail-abuse.org with the intention of registering as a
hobbyist/individual user. The registration requires that you download and
print off two copies of a pdf file to fill in and send off by snail-mail -
22 sheets of A4 total! Nice of them to provide the service free to amatuers
wrote on Sat, 7 Jun 2003 02:14:55 -0400 (EDT):
> Hi list
>
Hi, your posting is more or less unreadable because of the weird
formatting, please consider using a decent mail program and remailing your
questions and please consider not to use HTML. You may also want to put a
name in the appropr
Sir or Madam,
With the recent change of business names from theVSP.com, Inc. to Virtual Solution
Partners, LLC, we have removed all previous email accounts bearing the "thevsp.com"
extension.
DO NOT WORRY... If you are using an existing email address bearing the "thevsp.com"
extension, your me
Stuart Gall writes:
> Is SA Proxy different to pop3proxy ? I use pop3proxy very
> successfully with windoze clients.
SAProxy is the new name for pop3proxy. It's available as a binary
build, and the source is now in CVS.
Jack Gostl writes:
> I installed SAProxy have it working, and its not bad
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:06:37AM -0400, Michael Clark wrote:
> Interesting. you're right, email with mclark in the subject get
> caught. But it does not seem to be catching virtual names as the
> alternate To:. for example, webmaster@ comes into my regular
> username, but that rule does not se
Hi,
Now I've got SA working well (thanks NG!), I'd really like to do something
to hit or at least cause some inconvenience to spammers, rather than just
passively dump spam. Devin Carraway's Sugarplum spam poisoner look an
interesting option, does anyone use it or have opinions on it, please?
Reg
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:13:08PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> I think it was either Theo Van Dinter or Tony Svanstrom that once pointed
> out that any spamtrap listed on a website needs to be closely monitored, as
> some mailviruses for some reason will wind up extracting email addresses
> fr
Fuzzy Fox wrote on Fri, 06 Jun 2003 22:34:44 -0500:
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> This, however, is a header that your mailer is supposed to use for
> replying to mail. But... where did it come from?
Clever clients put it in. This is a mailing list, replies should usually
go to it, not t
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 07:49:56 -0700
"Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Question: what are the advantages of using bmf over using SA's
> built-in Bayes support?
Because bmf, as it do only bayesian filtering, is faster than SA, but
the main reason is that I'm looking for a good configuration =
30 matches
Mail list logo
