LuKreme wrote:
On Monday, Feb 17, 2003, at 18:01 Canada/Mountain, David Dellanave wrote:
Would someone please fix the Reply-To: header for the SA list so you
can just click Reply and it replies to the list, not the sender.
Sure: Put this in your procmailrc
:0
* ^List-Id:.*spamassassin-talk\
I apologize if this is a dumb question, or a FAQ, but I just install 2.5
on my main server, and after teaching the bayes stuff, I got this report
on a ham email I ran through:
-15.30 points, 5 required;
* -3.1 -- User-Agent header indicates a non-spam MUA (Outlook Express)
* -3.2 -- Has a In-Rep
- Original Message -
From: "SpamTalk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin
> Why is this not in the FAQ with a big bold hyperlink on the home page?
Off the top of my hat, a few reasons...
Probab
Tony Earnshaw wrote on 18 Feb 2003 22:36:13 +0100:
> Christmas,
New Year's Eve ;-) And you forgot to mention the tiger fur on the
floor ...
> And in
> Germany.
>
It was made in Germany, AFAIR!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.cona
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:51:31PM -0600, Jim Wiley wrote:
> I don't like typing.
>
> Is there a solution?
spamc will try to figure out the username based on the current uid.
So my guess is that 'spamc' sees root or mail or whoever is running
your mailserver.
Do you have "DROPPRIVS=yes" in the p
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:43:15AM +0200, Tanel Kokk wrote:
> if ( $SASqlTests ) {
> $SAobject->compile_now(0);
> $SAobject->load_scoreonly_sql ("global");
> $SAobject->load_scoreonly_sql ($username);
> }
>
> Where "global" is specific username in SQL databas
Calling SPAMC from /etc/procmailrc;
and running SPAMD on a second host, I cannot get user_prefs in user's home
directories to work.
This looks like a process ownership problem. When I specify -u username in
the spamc line in /etc/procmailrc,
the user's .spamassassin/user_prefs is observed and
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 07:26:09PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> That is one nice advantage of using the RPM or .deb packages if you can.
> The old files are automatically removed. It only took me a few minutes
> to build the Debian package and install it (although I did have some
> unmet depende
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 the voices made Susan Civil-Brown write:
SC> I never downloaded SpamAssassin, so I don't know what it's doing on my
SC> computer. I certainly don't need it as I have a good spam program, and
SC> SpamAssassin tends to screw up messages that have to do with putting things
SC> on
Why is this not in the FAQ with a big bold hyperlink on the home page?
Someone else moaned about how the wanted SpamAssassin off their computer not
too long ago and an excellent reply was posted. I intended use it to add a
FAQ entry. However the archive search appears to be totally broken or I am
s
tir, 2003-02-18 kl. 18:33 skrev Steve Thomas:
> t/spamd_report..ok 5/8 Not found: yelling =
> LINES_OF_YELLING
> # Failed test 7 in t/SATest.pm at line 331
> t/spamd_report..FAILED test 7
> Failed 1/8 tests, 87.50% okay
I had that, when I used the .tar.gz inst
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Clayton, Nik [IT] wrote:
> > But if there's a "man spamassassin", why isn't there a "man
> > spamassassin.conf?" There's a "man slapd.conf" and a "man
> > slapd.access"
> > etc. etc.
I agree, Tony. There should be a spamassassin.conf(5) man page.
> If your Perl installation
Thomas Kinghorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do I whitelist the postmaster address?
>
> I was thinking:
> whitelist_to_rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Any assistance would be appreciated.
Interesting. Instead of making up a new configuration option, I suggest
using one supported by SpamAss
13 matches
Mail list logo
