HI,
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:43:09 -0600
"Nick Marino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I will try to ask this question again, last time I was attacked for
> asking.
No, last time you were roundly chastised for being a right, honorable
bastard to anyone who tried to help you or get any specifi
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Justin Mason wrote:
> You need to create an auto-whitelist factory.
>
> use Mail::SpamAssassin;
> use Mail::SpamAssassin::DBBasedAddrList;
> my $spamtest = new Mail::SpamAssassin ({ .. options ... };
> my $addrlistfactory = Mail::SpamAssassin::DBBasedAddrList->new();
I guess I will try to ask this question again, last time I was attacked for
asking.
Anyone have any idea why SA would strip carriage returns from some HTML mail
and not others.
When this happens it causes OE to hang on the message that has the carriage
returns stripped from it. It does not do it
Stop what?
If you need your address added to the whitelist_to list, contact your ISP
your mail system administrator.
This mailing list is for Spamassassin developers and users.. none of us
have anything to do with your email, or how your ISP or company handles
their mail. We just use and/or wr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> anybody have any ideas here? is anyone else even using mail::audit or
> mail::spamassassin::nomailaudit??
You need to create an auto-whitelist factory.
use Mail::SpamAssassin;
use Mail::SpamAssassin::DBBasedAddrList;
my $spamtest = new Mail::SpamAssassin ({ .. o
Yes, I have an SMTP-gw running Gentoo which check every mail for viruses
(ClamAV) and spam (spamassassin) via MimeDefang. Everything went
smoothly and as you say, gentoo is highly configurable.
Kim Leandersson
Chalmers Student Union
Chalmers University of Technology
> -Original Message-
Are the Bayesian learning tools sa-learn-spam, sa-learn-nonspam, and
sa-rebuild in working order?
I want to set up Bayesian for a whole mailhost, rather than for a single
user. I want to put the databases in a location under /var/spool, not in a
user's home directory.
So I have my nonspam and
please excuse if posted to wrong list :)
> Having a problem with modifying the subject to include the ***SPAM***
> additions. I am running postfix 2 with amavisd-new (latets version). I
> am also running SpamAssassin 2.50-cvs. The problem im having is when i
> send the sample-spam.txt messages
anybody have any ideas here? is anyone else even using mail::audit or
mail::spamassassin::nomailaudit??
thanks,
--kip
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:spamassassin-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:17 AM
> To:
Having a problem with modifying the subject to include the ***SPAM***
additions. I am running postfix 2 with amavisd-new (latets version). I
am also running SpamAssassin 2.50-cvs. The problem im having is when i
send the sample-spam.txt messages thru the mail server they are not
getting flagged
"add your address to the whitelist_to list".
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:54:55PM +0100, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Hmmm ... you could have said "perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf". Sorry
> about that.
yes, but then per the other thread going today, I'd be considered "rude". ;)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I'm here with the two symbols of the
Hiya!
I'm getting complaints from users because Microsoft Outlook VCalendar
messages are becoming just a wee little bit malformed, and thus not
working at all. :) That is, instead of outlook taking some sort of action
which asks the person if they are going to attend a particular meeting and
updat
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:18:27AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Colm MacC?rthaigh wrote:
> > This won't cover everything though, I posted to bugtraq twice on
> > saturday and ever since I've had a constant stream of vacation
> > messages and mail bounces. It seems a a lot of MTA installations
> > out
tor, 2003-01-30 kl. 22:06 skrev Theo Van Dinter:
> What I'm saying is:
> "report_safe 1" is the default. It'll rewrite the message such that the
> original is an attachment. "report_safe 0" will do the same thing as
> "report_header 1" does in the current version of SA, ie: The message
> has he
I am running the CVS
2.50 SpamAssassin from 2 days ago
When I run the
command /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart spamd begins to accumulate in the
process list. When I check the mail error log, I see:
spamc[21775]:
connect() to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (1/3): Connect
Justin Mason wrote on Thu, 30 Jan 2003 18:01:02 +:
> What's the MTA?
>
Look in his headers ;-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
---
Not aware of the -w option, I implemented the same feature as
a script in my maildrop MDA. In the past few weeks, I've
been conducting a small experiment where when spamasassin
detects a spam, it sends a bogus "user unknown"
message back to the sender. I'll post the numbers shortly
of wether or no
> Even when people ask questions which are answered each week and are also
> covered in the FAQ, or questions where the answers are blatantly obvious
> (i.e. "How do I unsubscribe"), someone (usually Tony) answers them with
> a smile. :) Even if they're just directing the person asking to the
> r
hi!
thank you for your emails!
I've found the reason: I use spamassassin from qmail-scanner and
digging into qmail-scanner perl code I've found that spamc is called by
the "-c" flag so spamassassin tells qmail-scanner only if that mail is a
spam or not. and the X-Spam... header is generated b
local.cf should live in /etc/mail/spamassassin not /etc/spamassassin.
if that doesn't help, fire up spamd with the -D parameter and look at the
debug output to see what configfiles it's reading.
(note: don't use -d (daemonize) with -D (print debug to stdout).. that's
silly since stdout goes now
Tony Earnshaw said:
> 'Spose it could have to do with the MTA you're running. I just happen to
> have the most fantastic MTA in existence, with SA 2.50 filtering
> actually built into the MTA daemon. It even analyses the spam after the
> smtp 340 data command and refuses (or even teergrubes) the s
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:12:02PM +0100, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> I thought that one of the really good things about SA 2.50 was, just
> that it =doesn't= rewrite the subject. At least, my version doesn't :-)
> Maybe I'm spoiled.
Well, by default. If you disable report_safe, it'll act just like
"r
tor, 2003-01-30 kl. 15:57 skrev Stuart Poulton:
> I have successfully got SA 2.50 working with SuSe E-Mail server, however
> is it possible to re-write the subject rather than just tagging it ?
I thought that one of the really good things about SA 2.50 was, just
that it =doesn't= rewrite the subj
| See? This is one reason that I want to leave.
|
| Everyone seems to *rude.*
If the people here seem rude, by all means stay away from the procmail list.
Your head is likely to explode if you join that one.
I've been on a lot of lists over the years - ISP, OSS, musical bands, bird
owners & watch
25 matches
Mail list logo
