On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:21:49 -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:14:27PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>> Duncan,
>>
>> the following snippet in your port of SA 2.43 gives ugly regular warnings
from
>> the automunter:
>>
>> Server:~# grep duncf /usr/sbin/spamd
>> use li
I was running sa on FreeBSD4.6 ok, after an upgrading to 4.7, all mail now
shows X-spam tests=none, I am using kmail and piping through
spamc to spamd. .
any pointer as to why/how this may have happened?
---
This sf.net ema
I have been battling this all night:
We are running SpamAssassin 2.42 infront of our GroupWise GWIA. We have SpamAssassin
running with spampd (http://www.worlddesign.com/index.cfm/rd/mta/spampd.htm) as an smtp
relay and pushing everything to the GWIA. It works great and our test users are
thri
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:30:57AM -0400, Jason KRISCH wrote:
> I am trying to get the autowhite-list feature to work for the entire system
There's your first mistake; in general, I've found the AWL to be
unreliable. I've commonly seen spams score a nice fat negative due to
the AWL - heaven know
Thanks everyone for the help..
I went through the steps suggested here, did some more debugging, and
found there were permission problems on the auto-whitelist files. I changed
those and everything seems to be happy now.. The problem was related to
using a different user when using spamd.
Your
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:33:44AM -0700, Neal Hughes wrote:
> Yes, it connects!
>
> /root/downloads/spamassassin# telnet localhost 783
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.localdomain.
> Escape character is '^]'.
>
> SPAMD/1.0 76 Bad header line:
> Connection closed by foreign host.
>
Hi all,
I'm a consultant with Stata Labs, which is a Silicon Valley-based R&D firm. We are
developing an innovative new email client, NewMonix. Like any email product, it needs
to deal with spam effectively. We view spamassassin as one of the leading open source
spam projects and wanted to det
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 01:59:53PM -0500, Smart, Dan wrote:
> debug: DCC is not available: dccproc not found
> debug: Pyzor is not available: pyzor not found
>
> What could have happened? I didn't mess with either pyzor or dcc today. I
> did load the 2.20 Razor, which is working great! Could t
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:03:18PM -0500, Johnny L. Wales wrote:
> Anyhoo, I wrote a little perl script that takes the name of a user and
> automagically installs SpamAssassin for them. It's not quite ready for
> primetime, but I thought I'd send in what I had and maybe get some
> comments on it.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 the voices made Kenneth Porter write:
> BTW, an open port 135 might as well be considered a solicitation for a
> message, so it would be hard to prosecute anyone using this to send a spam.
BTW, an open port 25 might as well be considered a solicitation for a
message...
Hi folks!
I installed SpamAssassin on my own account here at work a couple weeks
ago, and saw how cool it was, and then I showed it to my boss. Then she
wanted it and mentioned it to the CEO. He wanted it, too. Then I brought
it up in a programmers meeting and lots of people wanted it. Still, we
Classification: PUBLIC
I tried back revving to Razor 2.14. This didn't make a difference.
Not sure what to do next.
<>
|-Original Message-
|From: Smart, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:00 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [SAtalk] Pyzor & DCC not
--On Wednesday, October 16, 2002 11:51 AM -0700 Jonathan Nichols
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recall someone talking about getting hit with Windows Messenger
> spams recently. Here's an article about them:
> http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,55795,00.html
>From the article:
"While W
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 02:14:27PM +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> Duncan,
>
> the following snippet in your port of SA 2.43 gives ugly regular warnings from
> the automunter:
>
> Server:~# grep duncf /usr/sbin/spamd
> use lib '/home/duncf/spamassassin-
> 2.43/debian/spamassassin/usr/local/sh
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Tim Provencio wrote:
> Is there a way to add the scores to the tests that were done? For example,
> in the following it does report the number of hits the required and the test
> but is it possible to display the score of each test similar to as it does
> in the case of Spam
What about a rule hitting anything giving a strong or aggressive buy
recommendation for any OTCBB traded stock?
body MK_OTC_STOCK_BUY /\b(?:aggressive|strong) buy
recommendation.{1,100}\b(?-i:OTCBB)\b/i
score MK_OTC_STOCK_BUY 4.0
This might false pos for those who subscribe to a lot of legit
On 16 Oct 2002 Tim Provencio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Reason being; in the case of missed messages, it would be nice to see what
> tests are resulting in what scores. I've looked thru the config options and
> don't see anything of the likes. Is there some "secret" or undocumented
> directi
I don't believe there's a way to do that, but I sure would love to see
some individual scores in that header just to show what's going on.
On Wednesday, Oct 16, 2002, at 10:33 America/Anchorage, Tim Provencio
wrote:
> Is there a way to add the scores to the tests that were done? For
> exampl
I'm on Red Hat 7.1 (perl 5.6.0) and I tried rebuilding the SpamAssassin
RPMs from source. I got the "File not found by glob" message.
Apparently the files that are supposed to be in
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 are being installed in
/usr/lib/site_perl/5.6.0. I can see this path in the gen
Does anyone ever see true Spam that contains VCFs as attachments? I
haven't seen any yet, but I have had email flagged as spam with VCFs
just due to "spammish" stuff in the message. I'm wondering if this
might not be another possible "offsetting" value to think about.
Just a thought way too ear
One of my users got a 2.5M email that sent spamassassin 2.31 into an
infinite loop. Unfortunately I wasn't able to capture the e-mail. I
did an strace() on the spamassassin process and it kept mmap()ing and
unmmap()ing one section of the file. Has anyone seen similar behavior?
Thanks,
John D
Hey guys -
I recall someone talking about getting hit with Windows Messenger
spams recently. Here's an article about them:
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,55795,00.html
Geez. Spammers just keep sinking to new depths. Just when I thought they
had hit the rock bottom of scum, th
Classification: PUBLIC
I'm running the release 2.43 code.
I had Razor2, DCC, and Pyzor all running under 2.42 and 2.43.
Now, all of a sudden, DCC and Pyzor have quit running.
When I loaded spamd from command prompt it says:
> spamd -D -x -a -m 8 -u filter -H /home/filter
debug: DCC is not ava
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:56:31 -0500, Robert Strickler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> The biggest problem with converting a url to a checksum, is it wont take
> long for the more sophisticated die-hard spammers to hack Apache (if it does
> not currently support the capability) to allow a randomized
These spams are so annoying. Any ideas for a rule that bit-buckets
anything that says "Cal-Bay" in it? (with the exception of "Cal Bay
sucks?") :P
I get probably 5-7 of these a week on another address..
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 05:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ro
Title: More granular reporting on unflagged Spam available?
Is there a way to add the scores to the tests that were done? For example, in the following it does report the number of hits the required and the test but is it possible to display the score of each test similar to as it does in the
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:23:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This leads me to a question. Is there a way to tell SA to ignore (and
> possibly overwrite) all conflicting header lines like X-Spam-Status? That
It does already. SA removed the X-Spam-* headers before scanning.
This actually
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:47:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running?
>
> The answer is that it's being scanned elsewhere. For instance, I
> receive mails (currently ~4% of my
No, do not edit any of the /usr/share/spamassasin/* files if you can avoid
it. They will be obliterated when you upgrade.
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf is the proper spot for site-wide applications
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs is the proper spot if you run SpamAssassin as
different users and wa
SA 2.42 has a bug in the AWL code that can severely jack down the score of
spam mails, disable the AWL or use SA 2.43
At 09:43 AM 10/16/2002 +0200, Vincent Nainemoutou wrote:
> All, please find enclosed a message header I am trying to tag. It is
>working for all other blacklist_from. I
Yes, it connects!
/root/downloads/spamassassin# telnet localhost 783
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain.
Escape character is '^]'.
SPAMD/1.0 76 Bad header line:
Connection closed by foreign host.
Thanks for looking at this..
-Neal.
At 10:55 AM 10/16/2002 -0400, Theo Van
We are running SpamAssassin 2.42 infront of our GroupWise GWIA. We have SpamAssassin
running with spampd (http://www.worlddesign.com/index.cfm/rd/mta/spampd.htm)acting as
a smtp relay and pushing everything to the GWIA. It works great and our test uses are
thrilled with the new spam tags that
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:47:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running?
The answer is that it's being scanned elsewhere. For instance, I
receive mails (currently ~4% of my mail per month) that already have a
X-Spam-Status head
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:57:18PM +0100, Usr Local wrote:
> I hate having to answer my own posts but I think I have found the right
> file - 10_misc.cf appears to work.
You don't want to edit the default rule files, they'll be
overwritten if/when you upgrade. Typically anything "sitewide"
is p
So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running?
Patrick
Original Message
From: Theo Van Dinter
Date: Wed 10/16/02 9:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [SAtalk] spamc && !spamd
On Wed,
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:48:15AM -0700, Neal Hughes wrote:
> Yes, ps ax says so, see here:
> 357 ? S0:01 perl /usr/local/bin/spamd -d -c -a -D -u nobody
Hmmm. If you do a "telnet localhost 783" does it connect? If you give
it a newline, you ought to get back a "SPAMD/1.0 76 Bad header
On October 16, 2002 07:31 am, Neal Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Spamassassin works well when I call it from procmailrc..
>
> I'd like to use spamc though to reduce overhead. It's not working,
> I get the following message in maillog:
> Oct 16 04:08:24 server1 spamc[9388]: connect() to spamd failed:
> C
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:31:55AM -0700, Neal Hughes wrote:
> I'd like to use spamc though to reduce overhead. It's not working,
> I get the following message in maillog:
> Oct 16 04:08:24 server1 spamc[9388]: connect() to spamd failed: Connection
> refused
>
> I can't figure out what causes th
I know zip about python, so don't know where to start debugging this, but
periodically I'm getting the following coming back:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Command died with status 1:
"/usr/local/sbin/spamcheck.py". Command output:
exceptions.SystemExit: 75
but no idea how to debug it ...
Anyone?
Yes, ps ax says so, see here:
357 ? S0:01 perl /usr/local/bin/spamd -d -c -a -D -u nobody
Thanks,
-Neal.
At 10:42 AM 10/16/2002 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:31:55AM -0700, Neal Hughes wrote:
> > I'd like to use spamc though to reduce overhead. It's not worki
I hate having to answer my own posts but I think I have found the right
file - 10_misc.cf appears to work.
Apologies for the duplicate earlier.
Toril
The problem I have is some non-spam is being tagged as spam and my
understanding is I can use the whitelist_from keyword to have specific
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:57:32AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's version 2.42 of SA. When I went back and checked, spamd was not running. So if
> it's spawning a spamd, it's not leaving it hanging around.
spamc does not spawn spamd. spamc tries to connect to the port, if
there's nothing
Hi,
Spamassassin works well when I call it from procmailrc..
I'd like to use spamc though to reduce overhead. It's not working,
I get the following message in maillog:
Oct 16 04:08:24 server1 spamc[9388]: connect() to spamd failed: Connection
refused
I can't figure out what causes that.. Any
It's version 2.42 of SA. When I went back and checked, spamd was not running. So if
it's spawning a spamd, it's not leaving it hanging around.
Patrick
Original Message
From: Robin Cornelius
Date: Wed 10/16/02 3:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:R
Hi everyone. I've looked through the archives and couldn't find a solution.
I see other people have had this problem though so I thought I'd post.
Here's the situation. I'm sure everyone has seen the spam that comes in
looking like you sent it to yourself. I get spam sent to me "from me"...
spamm
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Findlay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday 16 October 2002 06:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Get SpamAssassin for your Woody!
>
>
> Packages for spamassassin-2.43 are available now. The
> libnet-smtp-server-perl package
> I've got a sneaking suspicion that all of us who are using scores > 5
> as the "it's spam, bin it" threshold with the stock rule values should
> really be re-running the GA locally, tuned for whatever threshold value
> we want -- i.e., you should run it with the GA configured for a threshold
> o
> As you can see, almost the same proportion of mail is scored above 5.0
> (I would expect this) - but now only a fraction of said mail is being
> blocked as spam. To get the same level of blocking on that second day,
> under 2.42, I actually have to lower the threshold from 10 to
> 6.6 - not a s
Vincent Nainemoutou said:
> All, please find enclosed a message header I am trying to tag. It is
> working for all other blacklist_from. I don't understand why the score is
> negative. I did not notice any problem in my local.cf file.
Vincent, we need *full* headers including Received,
El Mié 16 Oct 2002 11:14, Jose Manuel Macias Luna escribió:
> I realized this morning that some spam is not being tagged by
> SA...
I know why... I'm sorry... spamc man page states:
" Note that the default size is 250k, so if spamc gets handed a
message bigger than this
The problem I have is some non-spam is being tagged as spam and my
understanding is I can use the whitelist_from keyword to have specific
from: addresses ignored.
Running on Mandrake 8.2 I have SA 2.41 running in site-wide spamd/spamc
mode as user spamtrap with header filters in /etc/procmailrc
Hello all,
I realized this morning that some spam is not being tagged by
SA. I tried to report that it is spam with 'spamassassin -r' but I got
an error: "Warning, unable to report spam", perhaps a problem
with my configuration.
What should I do ? It's very str
The problem I have is some non-spam is being tagged as spam and my
understanding is I can use the whitelist_from keyword to have specific
from: addresses ignored.
Running on Mandrake 8.2 I have SA 2.41 running in site-wide spamd/spamc
mode as user spamtrap with header filters in /etc/procmail
Hey guys!
I think this is what we were waiting for to solve that "unblessed reference"
log error that razor was causing. There's already a workaround/explanation
in the SA FAQ just in case it's not. :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Vipul Ved Prakash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTE
All, please find enclosed a message header I am trying to tag. It is
working for all other blacklist_from. I don't understand why the score is
negative. I did not notice any problem in my local.cf file.
Thanks for any advice.
--Vincent
From: "Artprice.com" <[E
55 matches
Mail list logo
