On Saturday 13 July 2002 10:20 pm, Chris Ogles wrote:
> Can someone help me with whitelisting...
>
> whitelist_from"*@lists.sourceforge.net",
> "*@ummail4.unitedmedia.com", "*@my-etrust.com"
Don't put quotes around the addresses, and don't separate addresses with
commas.
--
Giv
Can someone help me with whitelisting…….
This is my whitelist that I am
trying to get working:
whitelist_from "*@lists.sourceforge.net",
"*@ummail4.unitedmedia.com", “*@my-etrust.com”
I have this placed in my user_perfs
but I keep getting emails marked as spam fro
Hello Spam Fighters :)
I'm trying to use SpamAssassin 2.31 with my Mail Server, but seems
that something is wrong.
Some SpamAssassin features are not working. The worst problem of all
is that even when SA identifies a SPAM it doesn't add the
`*SPAM*` to the subject. Also... the spam_leve
Hi all.
Since no one seemed to want to answer 'Re-write of subject' I found a way
to kludge it... Don't know if this will work as versions go up, but...
http://www.northwestcomputer.com/html/filter.html
You will find my kludge about 2/3's down
Sorry for wasting your time.
tod
FlameTester
Hey all,
We're running spamassassin on a test system via milter and getting some
flaky results. The system is RedHat 7.2, sendmail is 8.12.5, spamassassin
is 2.01 and 2.30(we've tried both, both have the same problem). The
spamassassin install is default except:
# cat local.cf
defang_mim
Hi,
Interesting but almost positively the work of a spammer. A quick google
search on the whois address brings up some interesting commentary on the
address and ZIP code used, as well as the area code of the supposed phone
number.
I created a dummy address on one of my domains used only by me a
Here's one to watch. A footer from a recent spam:
Spammed? If you believe that you have been spammed, then lodge your
complaint with the Spamming Bureau. CLick below to go there now:
http://spammingbureau.com/
The Spamming Bureau is a "grassroots organization" working to fight spam.
Yeah, right.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 03:31:23PM -0700, Brandon Knitter wrote:
> Oh, so once Razor2 support is added (and I upgrade to that rev of course), then
> I'll see the razor score in the report? I guess this bring up a good question:
You'll see the score if the message is in the razor database. :)
>
> > Opps, sorry, hard to search the archives at GC! :) I am archiving in my
> IMAP
> > boxes now, so searching should be much easier! :)
>
> It wasn't meant as an accusation or indictment. I was just noting that I
> noticed the same thing, and asked about it.
Cool! :) Just being a good netiz
On 13 Jul 2002, Chris Cameron wrote:
> I'm working off a version of spamassassin installed by an OpenBSD port,
> so I may not have a "pure" install. It is listed as
> "p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.31 mailfilter to identify and mark spam"
>
> With that being said, I'm running spamd and using spamc to c
I'm working off a version of spamassassin installed by an OpenBSD port,
so I may not have a "pure" install. It is listed as
"p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.31 mailfilter to identify and mark spam"
With that being said, I'm running spamd and using spamc to catch spam.
I'm looking to do 2 things differentl
whitelist-to, more-spam-to and all-spam-to are great ways of preventing
various mailing lists from not being tagged when sample spams are posted
and discussed on them. However this doesn't really help much with off-list
discussions that have spam content. So I made these three body text rules
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Brandon Knitter wrote:
> > > > I recently posted a similar question.
>
> Opps, sorry, hard to search the archives at GC! :) I am archiving in my IMAP
> boxes now, so searching should be much easier! :)
It wasn't meant as an accusation or indictment. I was just noting that
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Matthew Cline yowled:
> On Friday 12 July 2002 10:51 pm, mark wrote:
>> The SpamAssassin help file lists some information about installing
>> dccproc for spam testing.
>> Is there a way to tell if and how well the dcc tests are working?
>
> Add "dcc_add_header 1" to your user
> > > I recently posted a similar question.
Opps, sorry, hard to search the archives at GC! :) I am archiving in my IMAP
boxes now, so searching should be much easier! :)
> > Or maybe Razor just didn't have the spam in its database yet. The report
> > isn't a listing of what SA does, it's a li
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 03:46:53PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
| FYI,
|
| I was dismayed to find obvious spam in my inbox today.
| This came through with such a high score because amazon.com
| is white-listed by spamassassin. (full headers to anyone who's interested)
Yeah, whitelists aren't that
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 05:43:29AM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > I recently posted a similar question.
>
> Or maybe Razor just didn't have the spam in its database yet. The report
> isn't a listing of what SA does, it's a listing of what matched.
>
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 05:43:29AM -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> I recently posted a similar question.
Or maybe Razor just didn't have the spam in its database yet. The report
isn't a listing of what SA does, it's a listing of what matched.
He didn't say anything about Razor2.
--
Randomly Gener
FYI,
I was dismayed to find obvious spam in my inbox today.
This came through with such a high score because amazon.com
is white-listed by spamassassin. (full headers to anyone who's interested)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ±¡½ì¥Î«~ ºô¸ôÁʪ«°Ó«°
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13 Jul 2
On Saturday 13 July 2002 06:41 CET Brandon Knitter wrote:
> > One thing is that the "read the archives" link to sa-talk takes you to
> > the searchable SourceForge mailing list interface (described as "beta"
> > by SF) whereas the other links point to the nearly-useless Geocrawler
> > archives. If
I recently posted a similar question.
If you're running razor 2.x, current versions of SA do not support razor2,
just yet. (I'm in the same quandry). Razor2 support is in CVS, but hasn't
been released, yet.
There has been some talk about putting out a release with razor2 support,
but nothing
21 matches
Mail list logo
