On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 10:18:59AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 03:20:31AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > Can you add a Requires: for package perl-Time-HiRes? (This is available
> > in RH7.3 and Rawhide, but for earlier RH it's in Power Tools.). I just
>
> It should a
Its supported in the latest CVS version, but not in the current stable
release - 2.31.
Presumably you can expect it to be supported in 2.40.
Daz
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marko
> Asplund
> Sent: 04 July 2002 15:56
> To: [EMAIL
has anyone been working on Razor2 support for SpamAssasin?
--
aspa
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Caffeinated soap. No kidding.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-ta
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Olivier M. wrote:
> ...
> Try:
>
> perl -MCPAN -e shell
> install Pod::Usage
> install Mail::SpamAssassin
> exit
my mail server doesn't have ftp access to the outside world so
unfortunately i can't use the CPAN module.
after installing PodParser v1.12 the tests go through o
This was nested deep within another thread, but I wanted to bring it to the
top in hopes of catching more eyes. :-)
On July 2, 2002 01:12 pm, Anthony Fleisher wrote:
> I did run into this problem while setting up spamd to use the DB to
> retrieve preferences. It seems that the configuration is
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 02:25:49PM +0300, Marko Asplund wrote:
> i'm trying to install SpamAssasin v2.31 on a Red Hat 6.2 machine. make
> succeeds but make test fails with lots of error messages saying:
> t/db_based_whitelist.Can't locate Pod/Usage.pm in @INC
> any ideas on what's going wrong? i u
i'm trying to install SpamAssasin v2.31 on a Red Hat 6.2 machine. make
succeeds but make test fails with lots of error messages saying:
t/db_based_whitelist.Can't locate Pod/Usage.pm in @INC (@INC contains: blib/arch
blib/lib /usr/local/perl-5.005_03/lib/5.00503/i686-linux
/usr/local/perl-5.00
"Michael Moncur" said:
> Some of the mutations are great spam indicators. No legitimate mailing list
> would include a tagline like "this is emailed speech without prejudice" or
> "send a postcard to unsubscribe" or "to be removed, call 1-800-xxx-".
> Perhaps SA should focus more on those an
On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 04:17, Justin Mason wrote:
> - more legit-list systems are following Yahoo! Groups lead, and
> including links to handle unsubbing -- causing false positives.
> After all, these links are *very* useful for legit-list systems.
It seems to be catching NeatNetTricks
> - more legit-list systems are following Yahoo! Groups lead, and
> including links to handle unsubbing -- causing false positives.
> After all, these links are *very* useful for legit-list systems.
Agreed. Topica's unsubscribe links cause trouble too. (And they're legit,
despite report
Derek at CD Baby said:
> I run a consignment shop, so the emails I sent out to our vendors
> get false positive by my own SA when people hit "REPLY".
> Has anyone found a solution for this?
> Do your put your own custom headers in the outgoing mail, then
> use a filter to look for that header in
> Damn. Ok. Thanks for the help. I thought mail clients return all
> incoming headers. Oh well.
>
> I'll just tweak the rule scores then to downplay the ones getting matched.
One thing I do is to include a unique code in my signature on outgoing mail.
When most people reply to my mail they includ
12 matches
Mail list logo
