___
Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.so
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 09:10:06AM -0700, Scott Nelson wrote:
> I think ESCAPES_DIGIT /%3[0-9]/ might be a good test too,
> and not just inside URIs. Escaping /any/ character that
> doesn't need to be is suspect.
Yeah, believe it or not, it some of these, they're even does %2E for the '.'
betwe
Don't know if it was the stupid subject that made this one go uncommented, so
I thought I'd try again (message repeated below)...
Basically the problem is this: When a subject consists of more than one line,
the second line might be indented so that SUBJ_HAS_SPACES is triggered (with a
GA-crea
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> In fact, it looks like 1.91 has clobbered everything as far back as 1.84.
rules/20_body_tests.cf may not be the only file that was damaged. This
"make test" error is back:
t/spamd_stopok 1/2 Not found: status = X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> It appears that revision 1.91 of rules/20_body_tests.cf has backed out the
> ONE_TIME_MAILING change from revision 1.90.
In fact, it looks like 1.91 has clobbered everything as far back as 1.84.
___
(I'd send this to the devel list, but I'm not subscribed to it.)
It appears that revision 1.91 of rules/20_body_tests.cf has backed out the
ONE_TIME_MAILING change from revision 1.90. I presume this was not
intentional?
___
Hundreds
Hi,
these days I got my first spam mail containing control characters in URLs,
I think from some spammer called Empire Towers.
Although 20_uri_tests.cf contains the test HTTP_CTRL_CHARS_HOST, it wasn't
triggered by this mail. I got curious because of this and the slight
difficulties to investiga
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 02:42:00PM +0100, Mark Lowes wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 14:30, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> >> From: "Mark Lowes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> I'm trying to get SA working here and want to try and get configuration
> >> on a per domain rather than a per-user basis. Has anyone
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:51:48AM -0500, dman wrote:
> | the easiest to setup/manage with SpamAssassin as a relay box - Exim,
> | Postfix, Sendmail, Qmail, ...?
>
> Exim with Marc's sa-exim patch would be the easiest way to implement
> this. You would just configure exim as usual (for a rel
I haven't been unable to get 2.20 to install properly (or 2.1).
When it runs, it passes spam as OK (0 points) saying something
at the end like "SPAM: no report templates found".
I'm installing this on a fresh install of Mac OS X on a new
drive. I had it running on another hard drive fine; I'm
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > For instance, if you use postfix+content_filter being spamproxyd, the
> > message is passed to spamproxyd, but it doesn't have any knowledge of
> > the recipients themselves ... does it?
>
> I wouldn't a
At 08:02 AM 5/18/02 -0700, Daniel Rogers wrote:
>These people have been obsfucating their URL in a bunch of diffrent ways.
>We don't seem to have any test that matches on that.
>
I see something in SA 2.20;
uri HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST /^https?\:\/\/[^\/]*%/
describe HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST Uses %
I had this same question when I first installed SA on our mail server. We
decided to let each user deal with tagged messages to catch
false-positives. this allows them to build their own whitelists...
What I do is save the real spam to a folder and run a script written by
Theo Van Dinter called
These people have been obsfucating their URL in a bunch of diffrent ways.
We don't seem to have any test that matches on that.
Also, what happened to the test for this style of unique ID at the end of
the body?
Dan.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTEC
you could store spam (compressed) for users who have opted to turn on
filter to a sql database which they can then view in the 'spam hold' area
and have delivered or deleted if they so desire.
simplified example:
:0 iW
* FILTER ?? yes
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| /usr/bin/spamstore.pl ${LOGNAME} ${FR
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Igor Demi wrote:
> Can spam assasin be configured so that if it rejects email (spam) it
> forwards it to specific account or can I get some info about rejected
> mails?
SpamAssassin will never reject email. This is a deliberate feature of
the product.
If you use procmail or
Hi everyone
Can spam assasin be configured so that if it rejects email (spam) it
forwards it to specific account or can I get some info about rejected
mails?
Thanks
--
Mr. Igor Demi
SOT Finnish Software Engineering Ltd.
Kreutzwaldi 7-4, 10124, Tallinn, Estonia
Phone: +372 641 9975
Fax:+3
17 matches
Mail list logo
