Jon Myers wrote:
> It looks like qfilter is inbetween qmail-smtpd and qmail-queue. By that
> time, its too late, qmail-smtpd has already accepted the message, and there
> is no way to return an error to the mailer that sent the spam (unless by
> some amazing chance, the reply-to, and From address
I have installed "MailScanner" on my Raq 4i and am trying to get
SpamAssassin going also since MailScanner supports it. I have run into to
the problem below.
[root local]# rpm -ivh spamassassin-2.20-1.i586.rpm
spamassassin
##
[root local]# spamassa
The latest (windows) one is kliez.h or some such. I had an infection
from it in a computer (not mine) last week. It is a tough one if you donot
have virus software installed that detects it. It will not allow you to
install virus software if it infects the computer. It took me 4 hours of
making
It looks like qfilter is inbetween qmail-smtpd and qmail-queue. By that
time, its too late, qmail-smtpd has already accepted the message, and there
is no way to return an error to the mailer that sent the spam (unless by
some amazing chance, the reply-to, and From addresses are valid). Or am I
m
Jon Myers wrote:
> This may be a big task, but has anyone thought about incorporating
> SpamAssassin into qmail-smtpd.
Why not use qfilter instead of a qmail patch?
http://www.untroubled.org/qmail-qfilter/
Lars Hansson
___
Have big p
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:54:22PM -0700, Robert Leonard wrote:
> When I use the ./configure command from Qmail-Scanner I get an error
> stating..
>
> "Something like SpamAssassin SpamC is present, but not working, -
> ignoring..."
>
Well you could have looked in the ./configure script :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Charlie Watts stated:
> On Sun, 5 May 2002, Sean Rima wrote:
>
>> I have found recently that every so often mails are not being scanned
>> by SA, I cannot find a cause or rythm to it.
>
> You're going to have to give -way- more
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Sean Rima wrote:
> I have found recently that every so often mails are not being scanned by
> SA, I cannot find a cause or rythm to it.
You're going to have to give -way- more information about your system than
that.
How are you calling SA?
How do you know these messages ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks
I have found recently that every so often mails are not being scanned by
SA, I cannot find a cause or rythm to it.
Sean
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rima
Hi,
I just got it running. Maybe somebody can update the script which can be
downloaded at http://www.clanhobbs.org/cgscripts.php
I took the script from the distribution and after changing the rights to
execute it works
Gunnar
_
Hi,
I'm trying to get spamassassin running, after struggling with the call of
the script I finally got communigate to send some data to it, but I'm
getting this in a email back:
I'm new to linux so maybe somebody get hint for me?
(Running Redhat 7.2, CGPro and RAV Antivirus)
> Failed to deliver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Attached is a patch that makes the following headers optional:
X-Spam-Checker-Version
X-Spam-Flag
X-Spam-Status
They all default to on, but there are now configuration
options to turn them off:
spam_checker_version 0
spam_flag 0
spam_status 0
Also
Craig Hughes wrote:
> I think the probably most effective blacklist-type use of the AWL
> would be in
> calculating zero-frequency a-priori probabilities for new
> recipients who were
> not previously in the AWL. As I mentioned before, if after say 1 month of
> populating the AWL through normal
> Though those are easy to whitelist. Is the philosophy here to assume
> that the user isn't whitelisting? (<- That's not a hostile question,
> I just don't know.)
It's generally the philosophy, I think. You have to assume that 90% of the
people who use any software aren't going to customize it
14 matches
Mail list logo
