Craig Hughes wrote:
> Well, one issue is that rules are sometimes evals, with corresponding
> updates to Mail::Spamassassin::EvalTests
Then EvalTests should move from being a .pm module to being another .rc
file that gets evalled as part of the compilation stage.
Matt.
___
> > If I use sitewide AWL (as defined in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf)
> but
> > still allow individual users to create their own user_prefs where they
> could
> > create whitelist_from entries would this skew the sitewide AWL db for
> other
> > users?
>
> Bart Schaefer mentioned this, and I
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 03:02:04PM -0500, rODbegbie wrote:
> > If I use sitewide AWL (as defined in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf)
> but
> > still allow individual users to create their own user_prefs where they
> could
> > create whitelist_from entries would this skew the sitewide AWL db for
> If I use sitewide AWL (as defined in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf)
but
> still allow individual users to create their own user_prefs where they
could
> create whitelist_from entries would this skew the sitewide AWL db for
other
> users?
Bart Schaefer mentioned this, and I entered this int
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:13:58AM -0500, Jeffrey Bacon wrote:
> So you've got it running on a LInix box? I'm having a devil of a time
> gettig mail to be delivered after running ti through spamc on my Red Hat
> box. Could you just check to see if my setup is the same as yours?
>
> /etc/procm
Want to pose this question to the more knowlegeable:
If I use sitewide AWL (as defined in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf) but
still allow individual users to create their own user_prefs where they could
create whitelist_from entries would this skew the sitewide AWL db for other
users? Here is
That could be equivalent to my set-up. I start spamd from /etc/rc.d/
init.d/spamassassin, which basicly runs "spamd -d -u spamd", where the
spamd user has no privileges. I've attached my procmail recipe.
Good luck...
On 30 March 2002 at 9:13, Jeffrey Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you'v
That worked! Thanks, man!
Craig Hughes wrote:
>Add the flag '-F1' to the spamd command line and restart spamd.
>
>C
>
>On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 20:12, Jeffrey J. Bacon wrote:
>
>>Shows up when I cat/more/tail the file but (I just checked) not with 'mail'.
>>Here's the mail from the spool file:
>>
I was able to get my mail server to add a special header for people who
relay mail through me from dialup IPs after having done an SMTP AUTH, so
their mail doesn't get flagged by SA anymore (since I have an SA rule to add
a -100 if the auth header is present)
However, from time to time,
Try the following:
# . /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions
# killproc spamd
What does it say?
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 09:57, AHA Lists wrote:
> I am running this as root. Any other ideas?
>
>
>
> on 4/1/02 11:43 AM, Craig Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Only thing I can think of is you're
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 09:53, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> Not everybody watches good morning america. I, for one, do not.
> Sorry for the misguided attempt to be helpful.
At the risk of being off topic, following the theory that politeness
should always be as public as the opposite, I would like
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:35:29AM -0800, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 08:41, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> > Simply use the "unzip" program, which should be part of your distribution.
>
> No, no, no! These questions are from Windows users!
>
> Craig, before this list gets ove
I am running this as root. Any other ideas?
on 4/1/02 11:43 AM, Craig Hughes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Only thing I can think of is you're not root when trying to run the
> shutdown script, so you can't kill the process. Become root first, then
> run the script.
>
> C
>
> On Mon, 2002-
Ok, the web page is now updated.
I also sent an email to Tiffany Shlain, GMA's "computer expert" to
hopefully clarify things with her so she's ready next time :)
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 09:35, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 08:41, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> > Simply use the
HAHAHAHAHA!
And here's me thinking I was causing annoyance with my Win32 questions! If
there are any Win32 users that *realy* want to try out SA, my proxy does
work (mostly) but it's certainly not at a "point and drool" release. Any
dedicated Win32 users who aren't scared of installing Perl and ge
Sidney Markowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps you can suggest that Windows end users speak to their ISP
> about installing Spamassassin as a service to their customers.
You might also consider setting up an email service for $5 a month or
so that runs spamassassin. I'd be willing to he
Only thing I can think of is you're not root when trying to run the
shutdown script, so you can't kill the process. Become root first, then
run the script.
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 06:57, AHA Lists wrote:
> When ever I try and stop spamd I get an error using the redhat init script.
>
> /etc/rc.
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 the voices made Jay Jacobs write:
> To put it nicely, I'd say this idea could use some refining. It's very
> common for spammers to either spoof the source address or not check the
> mail once spam is sent out.
True, and that's the part that I'm not happy with... at the same
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 08:41, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> Simply use the "unzip" program, which should be part of your distribution.
No, no, no! These questions are from Windows users!
Craig, before this list gets overwhelmed with pleas for help from naive
PC owners who watched Good Morning Ame
Oh my god. SpamAssassin on GMA. We're doomed.
Cheryl, I didn't see the show, but I imagine that they probably failed
to point out that SA doesn't currently run on Windows. I'll try calling
the show and seeing what they actually said, and if they want some
clarification of things...
C
On Mon,
Sounds great Ed. Could you stick the patch in a bugzilla ticket so we
can track it, then assign it to me once it's ready to roll into CVS?
Thanks,
C
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 01:30, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> I am working on a vpopmail patch to SA. My first go at it on Friday looks
> g
It may be a syslog thing now that you mention that. I think I've seen
that before with syslog not noticing some clock changes (mainly TZ
changes) until it's restarted (or maybe SIGHUP also works)
C
On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 20:29, Matthew Dickinson wrote:
>
>
> It took a full stop/start of both s
Hi Sarah,
To save you some time and grief, spamassassin is not meant to run on Windows
at the enduser point. It is supposed to be run by your ISP on their Unix
mail server, although I'm sure some smart Windows admin's have it running on
Windows mail servers as well.
Regards,
Rick
- Origi
At 18:31 01/04/2002, you wrote:
>Help!? I successfully downloaded Spamassasin 2.11 in zip format, but
>when I go to open it, I don't know what application program to look for,
>and it's not automatically finding one itself
>
>How do I get this started so I can start using it with my e-mail?
>
At 4:30 AM -0500 on 4/1/02, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
>I have patched spamd to look for
>user prefs in the users vpopmail homedir. When I get closer I will forward
>the patch to you and perhaps you can test it?
Sounds like just what we need. Send it along when it's ready and I'll
tr
To put it nicely, I'd say this idea could use some refining. It's very
common for spammers to either spoof the source address or not check the
mail once spam is sent out.
Since my ratio of real to false-positives is about 300:1 per week, I'd be
sending out 300 wastes of resources a week. They'd
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 10:31:09AM -0600, Sarah Guthmann wrote:
> Help!? I successfully downloaded Spamassasin 2.11 in zip format, but
> when I go to open it, I don't know what application program to look for,
> and it's not automatically finding one itself
>
> How do I get this started so I
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 07:51:36AM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote:
> Good Morning America? No, that can't be.
According to their webpage, they were going to have a "Web expert" on to
share some tips about filtering out junk email:
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/GoodMorningAmerica/GMA020401Tiffany
Help!? I successfully downloaded Spamassasin 2.11 in zip format, but
when I go to open it, I don't know what application program to look for,
and it's not automatically finding one itself
How do I get this started so I can start using it with my e-mail?
Thanks so much, from an embarassed no
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 07:51:36AM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote:
>
>>Good Morning America? No, that can't be.
>>
>
>According to their webpage, they were going to have a "Web expert" on to
>share some tips about filtering out junk email:
>
>http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/
I've set up my filters to reply to all that's caught as SPAM, mostly to be
able to have them somewhat strict without risking that friends and/or work-
related e-mails are deleted without any warnings.
The goal is a riskfree system that is 100% invisible to me; and that's simple
enough to work a
Cheryl Harlow wrote:
I tried to download Spam Assassin and now I can't get it to work???
I tried downloading it as a zip and also the first version listed on the
page. Everytime I unzipped and attempted to load using WinZip I got an
error message from Microsoft and
When ever I try and stop spamd I get an error using the redhat init script.
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd stop
Shutting down spamd: ERROR!
If I try and use restart I get
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd restart
Shutting down spamd: ERROR!
Starting spamd: spamdbind: Address already in use at /usr/bin/spamd line
I tried to download Spam Assassin and now I can't get it to work??? I
tried downloading it as a zip and also the first version listed on the
page. Everytime I unzipped and attempted to load using WinZip I got an
error message from Microsoft and it closed down. I'm not a computer whiz
per
I am working on a vpopmail patch to SA. My first go at it on Friday looks
good. When it is ready I will release it to the list in a few days.
Basically you pass the email address using "spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (like
the SQL lookup feature) and spamd will look up userinfo from vpopmail.
Norma
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Rich Duzenbury wrote:
> I don't believe I signed up for this. Seems that if there is a
> 'complain to' header, it is likely spam. What do you think?
Bad heuristic. Many ISP systems insert such a header into all messages
relayed through them to assist in tracing ill behavior
36 matches
Mail list logo
