On 09/15/2011 10:14 PM, Maarten Brock wrote:
>> I think that side by side installation is already possible by defining
>> different installation directory (not 100% sure, I have to try it) both
>> on single platform (32 or 64) and on mixed platform (32 and 64). The
>> problem is PATH variable, whic
> I think that side by side installation is already possible by defining
> different installation directory (not 100% sure, I have to try it) both
> on single platform (32 or 64) and on mixed platform (32 and 64). The
> problem is PATH variable, which can point to only one installation and
> we
On 09/15/2011 09:18 PM, Maarten Brock wrote:
> I think it would be best if it could detect a current
> install (either 32 or 64 bit) and offer to uninstall but
> also offer to install side-by-side. This is also handy
> for having multiple versions installed. I currently make
> a copy of the install
> I checked in the installation script and found out that I was wrong: the
> new path is added to the end of PATH variable. If only one version is
> installed this is not a problem, but in this case probably it is: I
> would expect that the latest installed version is the first found.
>
> > So
On 09/13/2011 03:09 PM, Rich Bayless wrote:
>> Now what makes me puzzled is the
>> precedence: if I
>> remember well the installer adds the new path at the
>> beginning (on the
>> left side) of the PATH variable, so in this case should be
>>
>> ...;c:\program files\SDCC;c:\program files (x86)\SDCC;
On 09/13/2011 04:05 AM, Rich Bayless wrote:
> Hello Borut,
>
> I guess it would have been more accurate if I said, I manually edited the
> path to -not- point to the 32 bit version.
>
> After installing the 64 bit version, without uninstalling the 32 bit version,
> the path looked like this:
>
>
there is a path
precedence by 64 bit versus 32 bit, or is the path precedence strictly first
come, first served.
Rich.
--- On Mon, 9/12/11, Borut Ražem wrote:
> From: Borut Ražem
> Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] New sdcc snaphot build platform: 64 bit Windows
> To: sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge
Rich, thanks for the report.
> I had to manually edit the path to point to the 64 bit version
This is strange since the new installation should update the path.
Actually I'm confused with dual (32 and 64 bit) registry in WIN64 with
WOW64: if for example the path is defined in both, which one i
Hello,
I'm running Win 7 64 bit Pro SP1 and use Codeblocks as an editor. I downloaded
and ran the 64 bit package with installer. The installation went smoothly.
(Since I didn't uninstall the 32 bit version, I had to manually edit the path
to point to the 64 bit version. I deleted c:\program
