On 09/13/2011 03:09 PM, Rich Bayless wrote: >> Now what makes me puzzled is the >> precedence: if I >> remember well the installer adds the new path at the >> beginning (on the >> left side) of the PATH variable, so in this case should be >> >> ...;c:\program files\SDCC;c:\program files (x86)\SDCC;... > The sequence from left to right in the path, was 32 bit first, 64 bit second. > So the installer added the new 64 bit entry on the right.
I checked in the installation script and found out that I was wrong: the new path is added to the end of PATH variable. If only one version is installed this is not a problem, but in this case probably it is: I would expect that the latest installed version is the first found. > So it would be better to recommend uninstalling all old versions prior > to installing a new version? Yes. > Perhaps the installer could detect current installs and suggest an action? Installer detects current installs on the same plafforn (32 or 64bit), but it doesn't detect the installs on the other platform. Borut ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
