Hello Borut, I guess it would have been more accurate if I said, I manually edited the path to -not- point to the 32 bit version.
After installing the 64 bit version, without uninstalling the 32 bit version, the path looked like this: ...;c:\program files (x86)\SDCC;c:\program files\SDCC;... My edit was to delete the (x86) portion, leaving only the 64 bit path. In the morning, I'll restore the path to original and will check again, this time using only the command prompt to check the version. I will also reverse the order, so the 64 bit path comes first. I'll see if there is a path precedence by 64 bit versus 32 bit, or is the path precedence strictly first come, first served. Rich. --- On Mon, 9/12/11, Borut Ražem <borut.ra...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Borut Ražem <borut.ra...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] New sdcc snaphot build platform: 64 bit Windows > To: sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Monday, September 12, 2011, 3:52 PM > Rich, thanks for the report. > > > I had to manually edit the path to point to the 64 > bit version > > This is strange since the new installation should update > the path. > Actually I'm confused with dual (32 and 64 bit) registry in > WIN64 with > WOW64: if for example the path is defined in both, which > one is used? > The 32bit install updates the path in 32bit registry, the > 64bit install > updates the path in 64bit registry: does the 64bit path > have a > precedence? From what you wrote it seems that it does > not... > > Borut > > > On 09/12/2011 07:34 PM, Rich Bayless wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm running Win 7 64 bit Pro SP1 and use Codeblocks as > an editor. I downloaded and ran the 64 bit package > with installer. The installation went smoothly. > > > > (Since I didn't uninstall the 32 bit version, I had to > manually edit the path to point to the 64 bit version. > I deleted c:\program files (x86)\SDCC and kept c:\program > files\SDCC.) > > > > Compiling with --version, gives: > > SDCC : > mcs51/gbz80/z80/ds390/pic16/pic14/TININative/ds400/hc08 > 3.0.4 #6849 (Sep 11 2011) (MINGW64) > > > > I checked the install by compiling a short program > that tests serial communication between a PC and an > mcs51. I programmed an NXP P89V51RD2BN with the hex > file, and the program worked as expected. > > > > So far the 64 bit version works fine and I'll continue > to use it. > > > > Thanks, Rich. > > > > > > ------------------------ > > From: Borut Ražem > > To: Sdcc-User ; Sdcc-Devel > > Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 1:33 AM > > Subject: [Sdcc-user] New sdcc snaphot build plarform: > 64 bit Windows > > > > Hi sdcc users and developers, > > > > if you carefully looked to the SDCC Snapshot Build web > page, you might noticed two new items: "Windows 64bit > (experimental) (x86_64-w64-mingw32)" and "Windows 64bit > package with installer (experimental) > (x86_64-w64-mingw32-setup)". > > > > Both contains the native 64 bit Windows compiled sdcc > suite. The builds are done on Erik's cf-x86 amd64 Fedora 12 > Linux machine, cross-compiled in mingw_w64 environment > (libraries, header files, ...) with x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc > (GCC) 4.5.4 (prerelease). Regression test are ran on the > same machine with wine64 and they all pass. > > > > The zip packages > sdcc-snapshot-x86_64-w64-mingw32-yyyymmdd-bbbb.zip are quite > complete. The only remaining TODO is compilation of 64 bit > readline5.dll and it's inclusion. > > > > The setup package still needs some work: > > > > > > I just noticed that it has to be renamed since the > name is same as for 32 bit packages. The new name will > probably be sdcc-yyyymmdd-bbbb-w64-setup.exe > > Detection when trying yo install 64 bit package on 32 > bit Windows > > Proper installation in 64 bit registry and in 64 bit > "Program Files". Currently it is incorrectly installed as 32 > bit application in "Program Files (x86)" directory. > > Already mentioned inclusion of 64 bit readline5.dll > > Any reports of successful or unsuccessful > installation& execution are welcome! > > > > Thanks to Erik Petrich to upgrade cf-x86 to Fedora 12 > (glibc 2.11 is required by brebuild mingw_w64) and to > gcc, mingw_w64 and wine teams to make this possible. > > > > Borut > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual > Desktop > > What are the key obstacles that have prevented many > mid-market businesses > > from deploying virtual desktops? How > do next-generation virtual desktops > > provide companies an easier-to-deploy, > easier-to-manage and more affordable > > virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Sdcc-user mailing list > > Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop > What are the key obstacles that have prevented many > mid-market businesses > from deploying virtual desktops? How do > next-generation virtual desktops > provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and > more affordable > virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ > _______________________________________________ > Sdcc-user mailing list > Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
