> I think that side by side installation is already possible by defining > different installation directory (not 100% sure, I have to try it) both > on single platform (32 or 64) and on mixed platform (32 and 64). The > problem is PATH variable, which can point to only one installation and > we should decide which one (actually we should decide how the new > installed path is appended to the PATH variable: at the beginning or at > the end).
You're right, side by side already works. It is pointless to keep both paths in the PATH variable as only one will ever work since the binaries have identical names. This means it doesn't matter if the path is at the front or the back of the PATH variable. So if it is chosen to update the path then (even for a side by side setup) any old SDCC path must be removed and the new one added. Maarten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
