Eelke Klein wrote:
> --- Cory Foy wrote:
>
>>Highly insecure, but I got Xsane to scan by changing
>>/etc/hotplug/usb/libusbscanner to set permissions at 0777
>>instead of
>>0660 (which is why the permissions were changing on me!).
>>
>
> Normally in Gentoo the group will be changed to scanner.
--- Cory Foy wrote:
> Highly insecure, but I got Xsane to scan by changing
> /etc/hotplug/usb/libusbscanner to set permissions at 0777
> instead of
> 0660 (which is why the permissions were changing on me!).
>
Normally in Gentoo the group will be changed to scanner. If you
add any user who need
Highly insecure, but I got Xsane to scan by changing=20
/etc/hotplug/usb/libusbscanner to set permissions at 0777 instead of=20
0660 (which is why the permissions were changing on me!).
Cory
Cory Foy wrote:
> Ok, I got it working completely. I'm on a 2.6 kernel, so this might hel=
p=20
> someone.
Ok, I got it working completely. I'm on a 2.6 kernel, so this might help=20
someone.
The first problem was that I couldn't get sane-find-scanner to work.=20
This is because libusb has to be installed before SANE. Using Gentoo, I=20
had to set the USE flags in /etc/make.conf to be aware of usb. The
Eelke Klein wrote:
> --- Cory Foy wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I have been working to get my Canon LIDE 30 scanner working
>>under Gentoo
>>with a 2.6 kernel. I've installed Sane (and Xsane). My
>>dll.conf has only
>>"plustek" not commented out, and my plustek.conf file looks
>>like:
>>
>>[u
cory, the kernel scanner module is deprecated under kernel 2.6 that is why
you cannot find it, and why it does not show up under /dev/
instead, there is a user-space library called libusb which sane can use to
find and send usb commands to the scanner. just having libusb is not
enough, as it is
Hello,
I have been working to get my Canon LIDE 30 scanner working under Gentoo
with a 2.6 kernel. I've installed Sane (and Xsane). My dll.conf has only
"plustek" not commented out, and my plustek.conf file looks like:
[usb] 0x04a9 0x220e
device /dev/usbscanner
However, when I do a sane-find-s
Hi
Peter Kirchgessner wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> you should not need any additional configuration. I just tried my HP
> ScanJet 6350c with libusb without problems (up to now I used scanner.o).
> You can try to reduce your hp.conf to the minimum entries that you need:
>
> usb 0x03f0 0x0201
Thanks, b
Hi Jan,
you should not need any additional configuration. I just tried my HP
ScanJet 6350c with libusb without problems (up to now I used scanner.o).
You can try to reduce your hp.conf to the minimum entries that you need:
usb 0x03f0 0x0201
Just this line.
From the listing I see that the libus
Hi
Peter Kirchgessner wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> is this scanner really a HP ScanJet 4200c. USB says that it is a ScanJet
> 6200c. But that doesn't matter.
> After the first (and only) scan has completed, do the following:
yes it is a 6200c, sorry. My main Problem is why does it work only the
firs
Hi Jan,
is this scanner really a HP ScanJet 4200c. USB says that it is a ScanJet
6200c. But that doesn't matter.
After the first (and only) scan has completed, do the following:
export SANE_DEBUG_HP=255
scanimage > hp.ppm 2>hp.lis
and send hp.lis back to me.
Sincerely
Peter
Jan Rüdiger schr
Hi
I try to connect a HP 4200C to my PC running SuSe 8.2 with Kernel 2.4.20
and sane 1.0.11 (also tried 1.0.12). The Problem is that the scanner
only works for one scan after that sane doesn't find any devices. The
only solution is to reload the usb-uhci modul (rmmod/insmod usb-uhci)
I'm not s
12 matches
Mail list logo
