Am Samstag, den 02.01.2010, 08:35 +0100 schrieb stef:
>
> Hello,
>
> it's nice to see your scanner working. The back/forward motion you see
> at
> high dpi is called bactracking. It's due to the fact that data is read slower
> than it is produced by the scanner. So it has to wait,
Le vendredi 1 janvier 2010 14:29:24 Jochen Ehmen, vous avez ?crit :
> some additional info:
>
> The git version is working nicely, but it gets really slow on better
> resolutions.
> (I made an ebuild out of it and installed it as usual - maybe I missed
> some thing there...)
>
> I then tested usi
some additional info:
The git version is working nicely, but it gets really slow on better
resolutions.
(I made an ebuild out of it and installed it as usual - maybe I missed
some thing there...)
I then tested using "xscanimage".
- 75 dpi is quite fast
- 150 dpi is almost as fast
- 300 dpi take
Am Mittwoch, den 30.12.2009, 13:53 +0100 schrieb stef:
> > > ...but installing the
> > > backends isn't needed. You can test it in the sources' backend
> > > sub-directory with the following shell commands:
> > >
> > > export SANE_DEBUG_LEXMARK=255
> > > export SANE_DEBUG_LEXMARK_LOW=255
> > > exp
Le mercredi 30 d?cembre 2009 10:04:02 Jochen Ehmen, vous avez ?crit :
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.12.2009, 08:41 +0100 schrieb stef:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the problem is surely due to incorrect detection of the sensor in your
> > scanner. Unfortunately debug messages didn't show what I need to fix t
Am Mittwoch, den 30.12.2009, 08:41 +0100 schrieb stef:
> Hello,
>
> the problem is surely due to incorrect detection of the sensor in your
> scanner. Unfortunately debug messages didn't show what I need to fix this
> issue. I have updated the lexmark backend to better log init time i
Hello,
the problem is surely due to incorrect detection of the sensor in your
scanner. Unfortunately debug messages didn't show what I need to fix this
issue. I have updated the lexmark backend to better log init time information.
What I need now is the debug log of the l
Le mardi 22 d?cembre 2009 19:06:08 Jochen Ehmen, vous avez ?crit :
>
> Hello,
>
> thank you for your answer and also: sorry for the late reply - I was
> busy...
>
> As requested I attach the logs from trying to scan with the different
> versions of sane-backends (1.0.18-r6 and 1.0.20).
> I
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 21:10 +0100 schrieb stef:
> Hello,
>
> since I don't have this hardware, one thing that would help would the
> log of
> a scan with 1.0.18, and another with 1.0.20. Log can be generated by a test
> like:
>
> export SANE_DEBUG_LEXMARK=255
> export SANE_
Le vendredi 18 d?cembre 2009 11:26:47 Jochen Ehmen, vous avez ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> I try to reply to a message from the archive and hope it gets to the
> proper place.
>
> Despite the report of Stef (February 23 2009) I want to report, that the
> lexmark backend is NOT working for me.
>
> I also ha
Hi,
I try to reply to a message from the archive and hope it gets to the
proper place.
Despite the report of Stef (February 23 2009) I want to report, that the
lexmark backend is NOT working for me.
I also have a Lexmark X1150.
I use Gentoo and tried all versions available.
It IS working with
Le Monday 23 February 2009 01:14:23 Kristen, vous avez ?crit?:
> Hi!
>
> I noticed on your page
> (http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/lexmark-x1150.html) the
> Lexmark x1150 is listed as "not supported" and the comments section
> says "At least the Lexmark X1185 is now supported by the lexmark
Hi!
I noticed on your page
(http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/lexmark-x1150.html) the
Lexmark x1150 is listed as "not supported" and the comments section
says "At least the Lexmark X1185 is now supported by the lexmark
backend. Maybe the other X11.. scanners also work? Please tell us about
y
13 matches
Mail list logo
