Hi,
yes, indeed, the pnm backend gives nice results in all xsane
modes. I will look into my backend again the week after
next...
Just to be sure, you didn't hear of that problem with other
backends?
Karsten
Oliver Rauch wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I did some tests with xsane-0.86 (save and viewer)
Hi all,
my email address will change to
karsten.fes...@gmx.de
The homepage
http://home.t-online.de/home/karsten.festag
will be available for some time but I will move it to
http://karstenfestag.gmxhome.de
in the next weeks/months
For SANE-1.0.8:
Should I rewrite the files which contain th
Hi.
SANE-backends 1.0.7 compiled just fine for me, but with 1.0.8-pre1 I am
getting an error with the Makefile:
making all in backend
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/sane-backends-1.0.8-pre1/backend'
Makefile:125: *** Insufficient number of arguments (0) to function
`basename'. Stop.
make[1]:
mh wrote:
>
> Oliver Rauch, Freitag, 24. Mai 2002 17:27:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I did some tests with xsane-0.86 (save and viewer) and the pnm backend in
> > lineart mode some time ago and was not able to find any problems. I would
> > be glad to help if I can reproduce the problems. What I need is an
I think this will be solved in xsane-0.87, please tell me if not.
Bye
Oliver
Dave Close wrote:
>
> I have a scanner capable of 400-dpi resolution natively but which can
> also return 200-dpi results by internally averaging four pixels. When
> describing it in my backend, I specify that OPT_RESOL
Oliver Rauch, Freitag, 24. Mai 2002 17:27:
> Hello.
>
> I did some tests with xsane-0.86 (save and viewer) and the pnm backend in
> lineart mode some time ago and was not able to find any problems. I would
> be glad to help if I can reproduce the problems. What I need is an exact
> description unde
Hi,
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:55:00PM -0700, Dave Close wrote:
> Xsane seems to have a problem with the rulers shown on the preview
> window, particularly the Y axis. The symptom is that the apparent Y
> boundaries of the scan area in the window don't agree with those shown
> in the options windo
Hello.
I did some tests with xsane-0.86 (save and viewer) and the pnm backend in
lineart mode some time ago and was not able to find any problems. I would
be glad to help if I can reproduce the problems. What I need is an exact
description under which conditions the image is sheared .
The automat
Do a preview scan and the rulers are correct.
Bye
Oliver
Dave Close wrote:
>
> Xsane seems to have a problem with the rulers shown on the preview
> window, particularly the Y axis. The symptom is that the apparent Y
> boundaries of the scan area in the window don't agree with those shown
> in th
Hi Peter,
Sorry, I meant the image is jogged. I posted two
examples at
http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~hilldo/HP6300C/
The colour and grayscale show what it should be, and
the (3) Lineart and (1) halftone show what it is
producing.
Also on a side note, on a fresh boot of the system,
running x
Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
>I wrote:
>> Xsane seems to have a problem with the rulers shown on the preview
>> window, particularly the Y axis.
>
>Is the scan size really > 100 cm? Hey, cool scanner :-) How did you
>"achieve" this effect? By moving the scan area in the preview window?
>Does it als
Hi folks,
I just got around to testing my scanner with sane
1.0.8 and xsane 0.86 and I have repeated a problem I
have had for a year or two and never bothered to try
and fix.
Scanning in colour or greyscale works great, but if
I try to scan in lineart or halftone the image gets
stepped various
Hi everyone.
We have the acerfirm perl script and and the .bin file. We do:
acerfirm -v /dev/usbscanner u96v121.bin
The scanner starts flashing and we get some output:
0xf8 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
But there it stays going no further.
Anyone got one of these scanners going?
Thanks,
Hi,
> i have successfully (seemingly) installed my snapscan e40 agfa
> scanner to my redhat linux 7.2 system. and i'm able to scan
> images as long as i like. but overnight, the system seems to
> forget something.
>
> the next day, when i try it again, when xsane tried to find the scanner,
> the
Hi,
> acerfirm -v /dev/usbscanner u96v121.bin
>
> The scanner starts flashing and we get some output:
>
> 0xf8 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
>
> But there it stays going no further.
>
> Anyone got one of these scanners going?
> Thanks, Steve.
What's the USB ID of your scanner? It seems that
hi, after my scanner has been on for a couple of days,
including xsane running the entire time. no restart, no reboot.
a scanner is still found in /proc/bus/usb/devices (see below),
but sane-find-scanner can no longer find it, and xsane can no longer
connect to it. and after sane-find-scanner no
16 matches
Mail list logo