On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 10:28:37 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> I don't really understand your concrete problem though. Why can't you
> build Sage the "usual" way (without easybuild), Volker's post explains
> how you can use the system ATLAS library.
>
> Well sure that's a possibilit
On 2014-02-04 17:16, Aaron Zauner wrote:
There's no way that's more convinient (autotools et cetera)?
Currently not. I think everybody agrees that the current system is
suboptimal, but fixing that is not so easy. Keep in mind also that Sage
contains software in many programming languages (C, C+
On 2014-02-04 17:35, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
What are the SAGE requirements, where can we find them?
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/source.html#prerequisites
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
Well we are certainly thinking about a better build system right now. I've
looked at easybuild in the past. I generally do like it, but:
* For development we want something that can do partial rebuilds reliably.
Easybuild aims more at the end-user building from scratch once.
* Doesn't get us cl
On 04/02/14 17:25, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Aaron Zauner wrote:
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 4:44:47 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
You can set SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=no and SAGE_ATLAS_LIB=. If you need to
customize it further you'll have to edit build/deps
There's no
Does it support OSX and Solaris? If not then thats not an option
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 4:32:55 PM UTC, Aaron Zauner wrote:
>
> This statement is probably there because UGhent is using EL based systems.
> We (Bio. Institutes of the Austrian Academy of Sciences) have been
> successfully us
On 04/02/14 17:36, Volker Braun wrote:
Does it support OSX and Solaris? If not then thats not an option
OS X: yes for the most part, I mainly develop EasyBuild on OS X. There
are some open issues though, but nothing major.
Solaris: we've never used EasyBuild on Solaris (nor do we plan to, to be
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Aaron Zauner wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 4:44:47 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> You can set SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=no and SAGE_ATLAS_LIB=. If you need to
>> customize it further you'll have to edit build/deps
>
>
> There's no way that's more convinient
Hi William,
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:25:43 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> But this is a nonstarter given our requirements for Sage: "EasyBuild
> has mainly been tested on RPM-based 64-bit Linux systems, i.e.,
> Scientific Linux 5.x/6.x. Support for other Linux distributions and
> operating
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 4:44:47 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> You can set SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=no and SAGE_ATLAS_LIB=. If you need to
> customize it further you'll have to edit build/deps
>
There's no way that's more convinient (autotools et cetera)? Might I
suggest that SAGE takes a look
You can set SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=no and SAGE_ATLAS_LIB=. If you need to
customize it further you'll have to edit build/deps.
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 2:20:15 PM UTC, Aaron Zauner wrote:
>
> Dear People of the SAGE tribe,
>
> I work as a freelance HPC systems administrator and are somewhat involv
11 matches
Mail list logo
