On 2014-02-04 17:16, Aaron Zauner wrote:
There's no way that's more convinient (autotools et cetera)?
Currently not. I think everybody agrees that the current system is
suboptimal, but fixing that is not so easy. Keep in mind also that Sage
contains software in many programming languages (C, C++, Fortran,
Python, Lisp, assembly) and with many build systems (autotools, SCons,
distutils, setuptools) and needs to be portable across operating systems
(mainly Linux, OS X and Solaris) and processors.
I don't really understand your concrete problem though. Why can't you
build Sage the "usual" way (without easybuild), Volker's post explains
how you can use the system ATLAS library.
Jeroen.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
