On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>>>
>
>
> http://pub.ist.ac.at/~jguzman/doc/neuron/tutorial/Tutorial0.html#to-build-the-neuron-shared-library-for-py
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>>
http://pub.ist.ac.at/~jguzman/doc/neuron/tutorial/Tutorial0.html#to-build-the-neuron-shared-library-for-python
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks -- so it's a library for "Computational
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://pub.ist.ac.at/~jguzman/doc/neuron/tutorial/Tutorial0.html#to-build-the-neuron-shared-library-for-python
>>
>>
>> Thanks -- so it's a library for "Computational Neuroscience"? Cool.
>> Maybe I should just make it available s
http://pub.ist.ac.at/~jguzman/doc/neuron/tutorial/Tutorial0.html#to-build-the-neuron-shared-library-for-python
Thanks -- so it's a library for "Computational Neuroscience"? Cool.
Maybe I should just make it available systemwide for everybody, and
update it regularly?
Yes, it's a platform
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
> On 26/11/13 19:01, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26/11/13 16:47, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jose Guzman
wrote:
>
>
> On 26
On 26/11/13 19:01, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
On 26/11/13 16:47, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
On 26/11/13 16:18, Jason Grout wrote:
On 11/26/13 9:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
IHMO overhauling the
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
> On 26/11/13 16:47, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26/11/13 16:18, Jason Grout wrote:
On 11/26/13 9:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>
>
> IHMO overhauling the note
On 26/11/13 16:47, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
On 26/11/13 16:18, Jason Grout wrote:
On 11/26/13 9:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
IHMO overhauling the notebook code is one of the important problems to
attach once the git transition is done... But I d
Dear Sagers,
For some time I have troubles when working with functions and derivatives.
There are cases when one need to have better latex representation of
derivatives, there are cases when one wants to threat dx/dt as independent
variable and diffrentiate over it (eg. to derive equation of mo
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
> On 26/11/13 16:18, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>> On 11/26/13 9:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>>
>>> IHMO overhauling the notebook code is one of the important problems to
>>> attach once the git transition is done... But I don't think it would be
>>>
On 26/11/13 16:18, Jason Grout wrote:
On 11/26/13 9:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
IHMO overhauling the notebook code is one of the important problems to
attach once the git transition is done... But I don't think it would be
a good use of developer time to make sweeping changes to the current
codeb
On 11/26/13 9:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
IHMO overhauling the notebook code is one of the important problems to
attach once the git transition is done... But I don't think it would be
a good use of developer time to make sweeping changes to the current
codebase.
I see (at least at the current
IHMO overhauling the notebook code is one of the important problems to
attach once the git transition is done... But I don't think it would be a
good use of developer time to make sweeping changes to the current codebase.
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 1:01:38 PM UTC, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>
On 11/26/13 4:16 AM, Jose Guzman wrote:
I wondered if it there is some effort (e.g a patch in the track system)
to provide some kind of syntax highlighting in the Sage notebook, just
like the one shown in the Sage cell server.
Yes, sort of. There is a major patch to revamp the entire frontend f
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:16:12 AM UTC-5, Jose Guzman wrote:
>
> I wondered if it there is some effort (e.g a patch in the track system)
> to provide some kind of syntax highlighting in the Sage notebook, just
> like the one shown in the Sage cell server.
>
>
This is certainly possible,
I wondered if it there is some effort (e.g a patch in the track system)
to provide some kind of syntax highlighting in the Sage notebook, just
like the one shown in the Sage cell server.
I'm using Sage 5.11 compiled from sources in Debian use the notebook
with Iceweasel.
Thanks
Jose
--
Jose
I think I've got it all working now! Thanks so much P!
I had got it working but wasn't checking the right thing! Running 'ulimit
-a' shows a throttled limit!
I REALLY appreciate your patience and help :)
Vince
On 26 November 2013 09:50, P Purkayastha wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 04:59 PM, Vincent K
On 11/26/2013 04:59 PM, Vincent Knight wrote:
Thanks P,
I have that setup as you suggested but I'm not entirely sure the sage
users are being limited (I seemed to be able to go over the limit):
Running:
import os
os.system('ulimit')
in the notebook returns:
unlimited
0
Assuming the username
I'm pretty sure my bash scripting is now ok (have checked and rechecked):
if [ vince != $USER ]; then
ulimit -u 100 -t 3600 -v 150
fi
The problem seems to be with ulimit itself not working... I'm running this
on redhat could that have anything to do with it?
Running the following in a no
Should it be:
if [ "vince" != "$USER" ]; then
...
?
--
Dr Vincent Knight
Cardiff School of Mathematics
Senghennydd Road,
Cardiff
CF24 4AG
(+44) 29 2087 5548
www.vincent-knight.com
+Vincent Knight
@drvinceknight
Skype: drvinceknight
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Thanks P,
I have that setup as you suggested but I'm not entirely sure the sage users
are being limited (I seemed to be able to go over the limit):
Running:
import os
os.system('ulimit')
in the notebook returns:
unlimited
0
Assuming the username running Sage is 'vince' (it's not but I'm not s
21 matches
Mail list logo
