Rob
Having looked at your weblog, I'd be keen to see further information why
you opt for GFDL over CC-BY-SA. Your weblog promises info on that, but I
didn't see it in the summary you sent.
john
On Sunday, October 9, 2016 at 1:33:14 PM UTC-5, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> Dear John,
>
> Harald has sen
Rob
Harald has sent you some great info and advice on licenses. Its a
> complicated
> topic.
>
Indeed; I had no idea.
> My advice would be to use Amazon's CreateSpace (easy) or Ingram's
> Lightning
> Source (professional) for print-on-demand copies.
Right now we're using Lulu, which is
> The bunny picture on page 195 is NC licensed. What is the agreement
> between the copyright holder of that image and your plan regarding charging
> royalties and splitting them?
>
As I wrote earlier, I had asked Kim Bui to grant us explicit permission to
use the photo under a CC-BY-SA licen
Dear John,
Harald has sent you some great info and advice on licenses. Its a complicated
topic.
I personally like CC BY-SA, and I also frequently use the GFDL (GNU Free
Documentation License) for longer works, even though it can complicate license
compatibility. Here is an incomplete set o
On 10/08/2016 09:43 PM, William Stein wrote:
I just looked at a bunch of random parts of this and think it's great!
You guys are just being too humble :-).
Yes! Looking good. Thanks for making this available.
Is this book the sort of thing that could legally also get converted
to worksheet
Harald
If I understand correctly, the mistake I made was confusing "noncommercial"
with "not-for-profit." Thank you for pointing out that very dumb mistake. I
have to emphasize this mistake really is on me; I added NC right before
uploading it, without thinking too much about it. That explains
Now I also started to look at the content, first off
On Sunday, October 9, 2016 at 9:30:44 AM UTC+2, john_perry_usm wrote:
>
> (c1) The administration expresses support for, and interest in, open
> textbooks.
>
well, as mentioned above, open textbooks definitions usually imply that
they can
On Sunday, October 9, 2016 at 9:30:44 AM UTC+2, john_perry_usm wrote:
>
> (a) The tentative license is CC-BY-NC-SA, unless someone convinces us
> that's a bad idea.
>
This is indeed a very bad idea, and even not really recommended by
creative commons related people. The point is that it viol
Thank you for the kind words, William. :-)
> One request: can you syntax highlight the big blocks of input code?
Somehow we didn't think of that. If you have handy, ready-to-plug-in tex
code, I could try doing that very soon. Otherwise I'm absolutely swamped
this semester, so it ain't gonna
Hi,
I just looked at a bunch of random parts of this and think it's great!
You guys are just being too humble :-).
One request: can you syntax highlight the big blocks of input code? I
might have some helpful tex code for that (using lstlistings) if you
want, which we use for SMC printing of sa
10 matches
Mail list logo
