On Sunday, October 9, 2016 at 9:30:44 AM UTC+2, john_perry_usm wrote: 
>
> (a) The tentative license is CC-BY-NC-SA, unless someone convinces us 
> that's a bad idea.
>

 This is indeed a very bad idea, and even not really recommended by 
creative commons related people. The point is that it violates those basic 
rules for "free/open content", and hence it would be impossible to use this 
book in settings like wikipedia or teaching.

wiki https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/NonCommercial


$6.1 
of 
http://www.opensourcejahrbuch.de/download/jb2006/chapter_06/osjb2006-06-02-en-moeller.pdf

The use of an -NC license is very rarely justi able on economic or 
> ideological grounds. It excludes many people, from free content communities 
> to small scale commercial users, while the decision to give away your work 
> for free already eliminates most large scale commercial uses. If you want 
> to obtain additional protection against large scale exploitation, use a 
> Share-Alike license. This applies doubly to governments and educational or 
> scienti c institutions: content which is of high cultural or educational 
> value should be made available under conditions which will ensure its 
> widespread use. Unfortunately, these institutions are often the most likely 
> to choose -NC licenses.



 Call for getting rid of NC and ND licensing of CC by the free culture 
foundation
http://freeculture.org/blog/2012/08/27/stop-the-inclusion-of-proprietary-licenses-in-creative-commons-4-0/


The NC clause is vague <http://news.cnet.com/8301-13556_3-9823336-61.html> 
> and survives entirely on two even more misinformed ideas. First is 
> rightsholders’ fear of giving up their copy monopolies on commercial use, 
> but what would be considered commercial use is necessarily ambiguous. Is 
> distributing the file on a website which profits from ads a commercial use? 
> Where 
> is the line drawn 
> <http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2005-April/002215.html> 
> between commercial and non-commercial use? In the end, it really isn’t.



 Also a blogpost by  Kathi Fletcher
http://kefletcher.blogspot.co.at/2011/10/why-not-nc-non-commercial.html

-- h

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-edu" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-edu+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-edu@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to