Find Your Programming Job Vacancy and resources here -->
http://www.jobbankdata.com/job-programming.htm
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
I ran into the same problem. Try installing (in opensuse) the package
readline-devel. This should provide the missing headers.
On Jan 21, 7:18 pm, Bobby Kurniawan wrote:
> I recently joint this forum. I have trouble compiling sage-4.6.1 on SUSE.
> Laptop Intel Dual Core 2.1 GHz, OS Opensuse 11
I have recently compiled sage-4.6.1 for opensuse 11.3 (see below for
details). I would be happy to upload the resulting binary
distribution, but have not been able to find either instructions on
how to do this or an admonition that such contributions are
unwelcome. Where should I look?
Details:
If I clone https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg.git, edit sage.yaml to
change the branch from develop to master, and run:
$ export PACKAGE="Runtime binaries only"
$ make bdist-sage-linux
then I get the errors:
make stage-sage
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/mike/Downl
Since the referenced fix won't be available until sage-9.7, is there a
(temporary) way to avoid this error message when loading files from github
into a sage cell?
On Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 3:02:51 PM UTC-4 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33771
>
> On Tuesda
Thank you for the suggestion, but I'd rather change the cell content as
little as possible. I'm trying to present a simple interface to my freshmen
students, so I think it'll be easier to tell them to ignore the warnings
than to explain the extra code. (I was hoping the load command might have
The sage cell server I'm using is sagecell.sagemath.org. Is there someone
I should ask to apply that patch?
On Wednesday, September 7, 2022 at 4:23:37 PM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 9:14 PM Mike wrote:
> >
> > Since the referenced fix won'
code, just some
additional code.
What I've currently got appears below - I'd happily accept comments and
suggestions.
Mike
r"""
Print the solution to a mixed integer linear program.
Variables are assumed real unless specified as integer,
and all variables are assumed to
d to
have additional input. Since these changes will break a lot of
doctests, it'll be good to get it right (or a close approximation) the
first time.
Thanks,
Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To un
Hello all,
I just noticed that there is an article on the front page of slashdot
about William and David's AMS opinion piece at
http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/11/18/1341232.shtml . I think
it'd be a good venue to get some Sage publicity i
My patch caused the missing horizontal bar, but the misbehaving
tracebacks are none of my doing ;-] A patch is up fixing both of the
issues.
--Mike
On Nov 19, 2007 7:49 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Since your patch is what I think caused
> h
#x27;data.name': '0:99',
'estimate': {'mean of x': 49.5},
'method': 'One Sample t-test',
'null.value': {'mean': 0.0},
'p.value': 0.0,
'parameter': {'df': 99.0},
'statistic
Hello,
One is a 1x0 matrix and the other is a 0x0 matrix.
sage: map(len, [a.rows(), a.columns()])
[1, 0]
sage: map(len, [b.rows(), b.columns()])
[0, 0]
--Mike
On Nov 26, 2007 4:38 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Is there a reason why matrix(F,[[]]) and matr
s into a plain text edit box,
> you edit, and click the
(1) Collapsible grouping of cells
(2) Ability to create a worksheet as a "library" and easily attach it
into other worksheets.
(3) Same as your #3.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this gro
pace. This
would allow one to interactively write and test functions that can
easily be used from other worksheets.
All that being said, I think a notebook coding sprint would be very good.
--Mike
>
> Then you can use foo.sage in either worksheet by loading it, but there
> is only one file
the "Toggle" link up at the top right.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl
that's still in the early
stages.
There are also quite a few other things from the MuPAD-Combinat that
would be good to have in Sage.
Let me know if any of these things sound interesting to you.
--Mike
On Nov 29, 2007 7:43 PM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> By the w
Hello,
> Mike, could you point me to your code?
I've attached the _very_ rough version I started awhile back. It just
does FormalPowerSeries and DataStream.
> I actually wonder why you would
> reprogram it in Sage and not interfacing the aldor-combinat library?
> Is there a
> > Mike, could you point me to your code?
>
> I've attached the _very_ rough version I started awhile back. It just
> does FormalPowerSeries and DataStream.
Just for clarification, the code that I posted above is just some very
preliminary experimentation I had been doi
r ideals.
While it may not be terribly useful in those areas, I wouldn't rule it
out for all of ring theory. As someone who doesn't do number theory,
the number theoretic definition of prime feels really weird.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
r things like ideals. Plus, this split highlights the fact that
there are really two definitions occurring.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
> BTW, Mike, what did you change? Were you able to get the eigenvalues
> command to work? (That's why I didn't post it as [with patch], though
> it's certainly more than what used to be there.)
>
I changed the eigenvalues command to use maxima's built-in eigenvalu
The most amusing thing about the discussion so far have been the posts
about how MathWorks makes you pay for all the support you didn't buy
over the years if you want to upgrade your license.
--Mike
On Dec 22, 2007 11:12 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
&
e more ideas of what you can do with
this: http://www.mathdox.org/products/gbnp/chapA.html
--Mike
On Dec 26, 2007 2:57 AM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
>
> This is one area in which Sage (and GAP4 for that matter) could use
> some work -- there hasn't really
I'm not really familiar with the plotting code, but it should be
doable since we use matplotlib. Here is an example of doing what you
want with matplotlib:
http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/examples/equal_aspect_ratio.py
--Mike
On 12/26/07, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
m#SEC457).
I looked at the documentation for Singular today, and it seems like
there may be lots of instances where you don't have a G-algebra with
PBW basis . I think each of these tools has their place, and the
functionality of both should be exposed in Sage.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~
I think this one looks good:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/5cube-11.png
--Mike
On Jan 2, 2008 5:17 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 2, 2008 4:15 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've created the poster and
ing a lot coded.
--Mike
On 1/3/08, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm in San Diego now (I'm going to the MAA short course on combinatorics
> on Friday and Saturday). Is there anything I can do to help from here?
> (I have a minivan here). Anyone want t
t's one of those things that you need keep in mind when writing
Python scripts that use Sage. An alternative would be to write a
vectest.sage file which would get preparsed.
--Mike
On 1/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/JC% cat vectest.py
I'm leaving Tucson now and on the road to San Diego.
--Mike
On Jan 5, 2008 10:18 AM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's beautiful, though there are terrifying rumors that it might rain. :-)
> >
> > --William
>
> Well I assure you it
It was my impression that he didn't want a matrix with matrix entries,
but instead wanted the matrix whose entries were given by the entries
of the submatrices.
--Mike
On Jan 8, 2008 11:12 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2008 11:05 PM, [EMAIL P
Hi Andrey,
Some of that is code that is still under a bit of development so I did
not expose it. In particular, I haven't thought in depth about the
design for how all of the Lie theory stuff will go together.
--Mike
On Jan 22, 2008 4:51 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED
or f,mult in a], []); b
[2, 3, 3, 5, 7, 13]
sage: size = 3
sage: c = [ [ prod(sp) for sp in osps ] for osps in
OrderedSetPartitions(b, size) ]
where c is your list of "multiplicative partitions". If you don't
care about order, just replace OrderedSetPartition
Sorry to reply to myself, but I just realized that I haven't done
support for duplicates in OrderedSetPartitions so ignore my previous
post :)
--Mike
On Jan 23, 2008 11:47 AM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a simple function that (like your example) can compu
R.ideal(I.groebner_basis())
sage: I == J
True
--Mike
P.S. It is better not to use strings everywhere but instead use the
actual variables.
> Is it really needed to say:
> sage: J=R.ideal(I.groebner_basis())
> sage: type(J)
> 'sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_ideal.MPolynom
> Help!
I'm not sure if you use branches or not, but if you do, you might want
to make sure that the file you're editing is in the same branch as the
one Sage is running.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
Hello,
I've added this as #1954 and posted a patch.
--Mike
On Jan 27, 2008 3:50 PM, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems the __abs__ method for vectors is missing the part that is
> supposed to square the components before they are added.
>
>
Hmm... witness is very unintuitive; maybe we can think up a better
name. Also, there are functions in Python which have similar
functionality.
sage: l = [1,2,3]
sage: any([i == 2 for i in l])
True
sage: all([i == 2 for i in l])
False
--Mike
On Jan 30, 2008 2:45 PM, Nils Bruin <[EM
useful as well.
--Mike
On Feb 4, 2008 11:35 AM, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Systems with an infinite number of solutions, i.e. non-square coefficient
> matrices. Does that make sense at all?
>
>
>
> On Feb 4, 2008 8:03 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
(x)*(sin(x) - cos(x))), 4/(sin(x) - cos(x)))
--Mike
On Feb 4, 2008 10:46 AM, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to find solutions to arbitrary systems of linear equations
> in Sage? I mean, without using an external package? (is there even an
> external package
trivial to move back and forth between the two
representations.
--Mike
On Feb 11, 2008 2:38 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all:
>
> Perhaps the following discussion (from emails, edited out for
> easier reading by SAGE developers) could lead to
00039 .. -0.9618], [-1.287 .. -0.8092], [1.847
.. 2.191])
sage: A*_
([0.5422 .. 1.535], [0.0844 .. 1.802], [0.8092 ..
1.229])
--Mike
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am interested
We should work on a wiki page with project ideas (assuming that Sage
will be accepted for SoC).
--Mike
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:47 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 26, 6:45 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://developers.sla
following works:
sage: class FooInteger2(Integer2):
:
sage: FooInteger2(2)
2
Can anyone tell me what is going on here?
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
/sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/partition.py.html
The green lines were executed, and the red ones were not.
It's a first start, but still needs a fair amount of work to be well
integrated with Sage (handling multiple files, etc.)
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~
fferent things. It's easy to
imagine cases where you can get all green but not so hot on -coverage
and vice versa.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
Here's the relevant ticket: http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/2387
--Mike
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is not general, but if M is your matrix, the code 'matrix(R, m,
> n, list(M))' is pretty easy.
>
&g
+1
--Mike
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Gary Furnish wrote:
>
> >
> > Trac #2436 adds the following algorithms from glib to libcsage:
> > Multiplatform threads
> > Thread p
urial book.
--Mike
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:12 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:18 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > William,
> >
> > git can do this. Since git uses a hash it will always re
patches affected a file. You can use the
bisect extension to binary-search through all changesets and applied
patches to see where a bug got introduced or fixed. You can use the
"hg annotate" command to see which changeset or patch modified a
par
I'll try to get this all taken care of tonight.
--Mike
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Daniel Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Jason Bandlow has been working on this - see his patches (on top of
> > David Roe's) at #2291. I don't know in which s
I've fixed both of these already. I'm mainly working on getting it to
100% doctests.
--Mike
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Daniel Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I'll try to get this all taken care of tonight.
>
> Here's another bug. T
Nice work Tim (and mabshoff)!
--Mike
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm pleased to announce the availability of a working set of Debian
> packages for SAGE 2.10.4. The dependencies of SAGE that are not already
> i
/misc/misc_c.pyx
. Writing a balanced sum based on that wouldn't be too difficult.
--Mike
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Sage team,
>
> i made a few timings with the "sum" function:
>
> sage: L2=range(10
est of 3: 54.5 ms per loop
sage: timeit('a=sum(L6,0)')
5 loops, best of 3: 1.05 s per loop
--Mike
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:13 AM, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Splitting it like this still yields a linear algorithm. If f(n) is
> the time to add a list of le
However, if I do the following, the timings look the same.
sage: sage: L6=srange(100)
sage: sage: timeit('a=sum(L6,0)')
5 loops, best of 3: 179 ms per loop
sage: sage: timeit('a=balanced_sum(L6,0)')
5 loops, best of 3: 202 ms per loop
--Mike
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at
n.
> Hence, sorry for my lack of "general computer science culture".
I think those speedups are just due to Python ints vs. Sage ints.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from t
I put my patch up at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2737 ,
but there is major code duplication with the product version.
--Mike
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:40 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Monday 31 March 2008 07:04:18 am Mike Hansen wrote:
>
cd of degree 100 listed here (
http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/users/allan/gcdcomp.html ). Magma on
the other hand takes 0.06 seconds.
--Mike
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Roman Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please excuse a (possibly naive) suggestion, but why not
I've posted some benchmarks at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/MultivariateGCDBenchmarks .
--Mike
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Roman Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The important thing isn't what algorithm is implemented, but that the
> > result is fast(er
Hi Minh,
Thanks for reporting these. I've made them ticket 2764 at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2764 . They will be fixed
in the next release.
--Mike
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- doc-main-2.11.0/prog/prog.tex
/benchmarks.txt ) are
pretty impressive.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage
> So in summary, there are people *very seriously* working on the notebook,
> in the above mentioned form :)
Hi Alex,
Can Knoboo work with Sage's pexpect interfaces, or is it a "Python-only" thing?
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to t
w this is used,
start up sage and run "sage0?" In your Python program, you'd use
something like "s = Sage()" and use the s object to interact with a
separate Sage process.
--Mike
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
es in a string and returns a string as well.
sage: s.eval('diff(sin(x^2),x)')
'2*x*cos(x^2)'
sage: s.eval('a = 2')
''
sage: s.eval('a')
'2'
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-
ed to specify the command used to start the program and fill in some
things like the prompt that Sage should look for, etc.
--Mike
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Kemeron Siemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi I'm Kemeron I am a student and I'm doing and independent st
Hi Mike,
I think you fixed this bug so that now it fails at a higher
value. I calculate
sage: s = SFASchur(QQ)
sage: s(s([14,14]).itensor(s([17,11])))
and after a couple of hours of calculation it returns a mess (rational
coefficients).
Again, this more likely to be a change of basis
5, 2] + s[21, 6, 1] + s[21, 7] + s[22,
3, 3] + s[22, 4, 1, 1] + s[22, 4, 2] + s[22, 5, 1] + s[23, 3, 2] +
s[23, 4, 1] + s[23, 5] + s[24, 3, 1] + s[25, 3]
I will try to get access to a PowerPC machine to try to see if I can
reproduce (and debug) it there.
--Mike
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:38 AM,
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 3:51 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wonder if we want to include maxima 5.15 in sage 3.0?
>
There were some issues with Maxima 5.14 giving wrong answers so we'll
see if they're
: time s(p(s([17,11])))
CPU times: user 257.11 s, sys: 0.03 s, total: 257.14 s
Wall time: 257.15
s[17, 11]
sage: time a = s([10,10]).itensor(s([10,10]))
CPU times: user 3.60 s, sys: 0.00 s, total: 3.60 s
Wall time: 3.60
--Mike
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:44 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
//www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac/benchmarks/gcd_timings
http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/users/allan/gcdcomp.html
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PR
> PS: anybody got beamer with sagetex to work?
Yep. Franco Saliola posted some slides with the source of a talk he
gave awhile back:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_frm/thread/be12e21544158624/e3d60d77ef171168?lnk=gst&q=slides+first+sage+franco#e3d60d77ef171168
unity of
people interested in combinatorics and have been collaborating with
the MuPAD-Combinat group over the past months.
--Mike
P.S. I'm receiving funding from Google to work on species /
decomposable structures in Sage over the summers so things on that
front should be pretty good in a few mon
d_pre_gcl] Error 255
Error building GCL.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g
typed language. But it does highlight at
> least one other point in the space of design decisions.
Python _is_ a strongly typed language. It is just dynamically typed
rather than statically typed.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send emai
I think a blog post with PARI timings and then timings for a modular
dsage approach would be cool.
--Mike
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:08 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:57 AM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
ything I produce is scalable."
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-dev
The cause for the original problem is this:
sage: Integers(2)['x,y'].gens()
(-x, -y)
--Mike
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:22 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Carlo Hamalainen
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &g
loop:
5 loops, best of 3: 83.8 ms per loop
Cyloop1:
5 loops, best of 3: 40.8 ms per loop
Cyloop2:
125 loops, best of 3: 1.83 ms per loop
GoodCyloop:
125 loops, best of 3: 1.55 ms per loop
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to thi
cannot read in MathML as input, but there is limited support for
outputting MathML.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visi
east to Sage) under the GPL.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sa
t I think would be a shame to poison.
>
> Yes, it's more work to collaborate with someone than to simply take
> the fruits of their labor. But it's better in the long run. And it
> also happens to be the right thing to do, which some of us still care
> about.
>>
>> Notice that the parent of t[1] is incorrect in the 2nd case.
>
> This is a bug. I've opened a ticket here:
>
>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3368
>
> and assigned it to Mike Hansen :-)
This was never the intended functionality of C
I don't really work directly with either branches or clones, but
instead have found Mercurial's queues to be the most effective way for
me to do Sage development. It is also well-suited for posting clean
patches on Trac for revie
bject whether it be a multivariate polynomial or a multivariate
polynomial ring. I don't see why one would want to tie the
implementation of the parent structure together with that of its
elements.
In your setup, I'm still not sure where place
Hi Kurt,
We are tracking this issue here:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3345 . I posted a patch,
but it doesn't seem to fix all the issues. I'll try to take a look at
it again in the next few days if I can find soome time.
---Mike
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Ku
> I can confirm that this is broken for me too in 3.0.2.
> I don't know why -- we haven't changed trace in *years*.
> Argh.
>
> Any ideas?
It may be (and probably is) related to IPython 0.8.2 which went in in 3.0.2.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---
A message from Florent and Nicolas:
--
Dear Sage developers,
After months of discussions and experiments we, MuPAD-Combinat
developers, have finally reached a conclusion:
We are joining you!
Tha
ort so it will take some
time :-)
--Mike
P.S. I think sage-devel is probably the most appropriate place for
this discussion so I added this thread there.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from th
Hello,
Sage currently does not have an interface to Scilab. If you'd be
willing to test it out / let me know what you need it to do, I'd be
willing to write one.
--Mike
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Filippo Donida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is
e for Scilab would be no different. Also, Scilab
5.0 is / will be released under the CeCILL license which is compatible
with the GPL.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, se
precision
ipdb> x in self.base_ring()
False
ipdb> x in x.parent()
False
--Mike
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:19 PM, saucerful <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have boiled it down to:
>
> R = RealIntervalField(32);
> A.=QuaternionAlgebra(R,-1,-1)
> print A
This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3612
--Mike
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 8-Jul-08, at 10:08 AM, saucerful wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to put links in the trackback messages that refer to
>
P(qi)
---
TypeError Traceback (most recent call last)
/home/mike/ in ()
/opt/sage/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/rings/polynomial/laurent_polynomial_ring.py
in __call__(self, x)
679 sage: L(1/2)
680 1/2
681 "
owing way:
sage: class MyFloat(float):
: def __mul__(self, x):
: return MyFloat(float(self)*x)
: def __rmul__(self, x):
: return MyFloat(x*float(self))
Then, you get the following behavior which is what I assume you want:
sage: a = MyFloat(2)
sage: 3*a
6.
ou should get a MyFloat
back.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-d
special directory, and it would
only work for this particular optional package. I don't see a good
way to do what you want in general for optional packages.
If you want to customize a Sage install, then you should just install
your own copy of Sage in your h
09.
>
> Any thoughts, preferences?
>
> Who would be interested in attending / speaking / coding?
Excellent news!! I don't have any preferences regarding the dates,
but I'm definitely interested in attending / speaking / coding.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~-
given the above command, please
> enlighten me.
At the the very start of your Sage session, modify the
gap._Expect__command object to be what you want it to be. For
example,
sage: g = gap._Expect__command
sage: gap._Expect__command = g[:4] + "-I '/path/homedir' " + g[4:]
-
s module.
Also, would you mind if we included the code as optional on our
sage-combinat patch server? I could update it every official release
or more often depending on what you think would be better.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, s
1 - 100 of 691 matches
Mail list logo
