>> >> Notice that the parent of t[1] is incorrect in the 2nd case. > > This is a bug. I've opened a ticket here: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3368 > > and assigned it to Mike Hansen :-)
This was never the intended functionality of CartesianProduct? -- it is different than the CartesianProduct? of Magma. It was mainly intended to iterator over the cartesian product of a bunch of iterables in Python. Maybe the name should be changed. --Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
