Hi,
I would like to let people know that there is a sagemath 4.1 package
for Mandriva cooker,
and it should be shipped as a contrib package in Mandriva 2010.0.
This is not an official announcement of Mandriva, and rpm sources
can be viewed at
http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/pack
2009/8/28 William Stein :
>
> 2009/8/27 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to let people know that there is a sagemath 4.1 package
>> for Mandriva cooker,
>> and it should be shipped as a contrib package in Mandriva 20
2009/8/28 Minh Nguyen :
>
> Hi Paulo,
Hi Minh
>> The package should be stable, but I am still resolving some issues
>> with 'sage -testall',
>> as not all components match sage spkgs; there are several errors due to
>> python deprecation messages followed by the correct result, or false
>> p
Hi,
The package I am building uses newer versions of several components,
and while I believe most of these tests probably are correct, I may be
missing some patch, so, if you can confirm it is correct, or is an
alternate correct response, please let me know.
These are not the only errors, b
2009/9/2 Martin Albrecht :
>
>> > doc/en/constructions/rings.rst +58
>> > sage: R = singular.ring(97, '(a,b,c,d)', 'lp')
>> > sage: I = singular.ideal(['a+b+c+d', 'ab+ad+bc+cd',
>> > 'abc+abd+acd+bcd', 'abcd-1'])
>> > sage: R
>> > Expected:
>> > // characteristic : 97
>> > // nu
Hi,
While debugging some remaining issues with the sagemath package I am
working, it had a bug where it would link both, statically and
dynamically with libpolybori and its associated libraries.
Interestingly, when LD_PRELOAD'ing libpolybori.so it would not cause
some crashes[1], but when p
Hi,
I am not experienced with pexepect, but I played a bit trying to use
a newer version in sage.
But since it is one of the core packages of sage (and because it is
one of the special cases where an older package is used, in my rpm
package :-), I would like to know what is the state about
2009/9/5 William Stein :
>
> 2009/9/5 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am not experienced with pexepect, but I played a bit trying to use
>> a newer version in sage.
>> But since it is one of the core packages of sage (and becau
2009/9/6 William Stein :
>
> 2009/9/5 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> :
>>
>> 2009/9/5 William Stein :
>>>
>>> 2009/9/5 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>> :
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am not exp
2009/9/10 Bill Hart :
>
> This program only takes 0.68s in C using a pretty naive mpz program on
> sage.math. I doubt the memory allocation is really relevant. The
> interpreter overhead is by far the greatest component
>
> Bill.
>
> On 9 Sep, 17:57, Nils Bruin wrote:
>> Inspired by a little expe
Hi,
In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the
maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's
maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get an error because when reaching the
cell:
A.eigenvectors()
maxima 5.16.3 returns:
[[[0,4],[3,1]],[1,0,0,-4],[0,1,0,-2],[0,
2009/9/14 Jason Grout :
>
> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In maxima-5.16.3.p2 as distributed with sage 4.1.1 when doing the
>> maxima tutorial, all goes well, but in my rpm, due to using system's
>> maxima-5.19.1-2mdv2010.0 I get a
2009/9/15 kcrisman :
>
>> > As for you for now, you'd need to change the eigenvectors() command in
>> > the matrix code. If you wanted to do so and submit a patch, it would be
>> > greatly appreciated!
>>
>
> But all doctests pass for me in alpha1:
>
> ./sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/"
> All te
2009/9/15 Jason Grout :
>> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py"
>> **
>> File "/usr/share/sage/devel/sage/sage/matrix/constructor.py", line 155:
>> sage: g = graphs.PetersenGraph()
>> Expected nothing
>> Got:
>>
2009/9/16 Minh Nguyen :
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> I think networkx 0.99 will require some nontrivial work in Sage, since
>> they changed a lot of things.
I forgot to say about another package, but at least for now, they
don't "cascade" on several othe
2009/9/22 William Stein :
>
> Hi,
>
> I was able to create a limited functionality separated sage notebook so far:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/patches/sagenb/
>
> One key thing I did was abstract out how the worksheets communicate
> with another python process. I then did a r
2009/9/24 Robert Bradshaw :
>
> On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:34 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Harald pointed out Sage getting into Mandriva is featured in their
>> release notes. In fact, it's
>> a big part of them. Here they are:
>>
>> "Mandriva Linux 2010 includes (or will include) the fol
2009/9/25 Minh Nguyen :
>
> Hi Mariah,
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Mariah Lenox wrote:
>>
>> The open trac tickets #4644 and #5507 discuss
>> problems with "sage -sh", specifically
>>
>> #4644 - No new prompt when doing a ./sage -sh
>
> I can confirm that your patch fixes this issue:
>
2009/10/1 William Stein :
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, David Harvey wrote:
>>
>> I am confused. I want to release bernmm 1.1 under the (modified) BSD
>> license. It depends on NTL, which is GPL-licensed. Can I do this?
>
> Yes, definitely.
>
>> Or am I forced to release bernmm under GPL?
2009/11/18 Georg S. Weber :
> Hi,
>
> this is circle of questions coming up every now and then, I try to
> give a complete yet not too long answer.
>
> The Sage community is limited in resources, and for the time being,
> the focus is set e.g. to further broaden the number of systems that
> are sup
2009/12/17 François Bissey :
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:45:36 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> This is not simply a run-time issue, as the conflicts are causing a failure
>> of Sage to build on OpenSolaris.
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7387
>>
>> I'm not convinced renaming the librarie
2009/12/17 François Bissey :
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:42:40 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>> You may want to check the sagemath package in Mandriva cooker, and
>> its dependencies.
>>
>> Mandriva 2010.0 has a contrib sagemath 4.1.1 package that requir
Hi,
I am trying to update my Mandriva package of sagemath to 4.3.1, but
I am having serious issues with givaro/linbox.
For some reason, only --enable-sage appears to break linbox, but,
for some reason, with gcc 4.4.3 (the one in
Mandriva cooker), it will not build liblinboxsage.so.
I tri
2010/1/28 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to update my Mandriva package of sagemath to 4.3.1, but
> I am having serious issues with givaro/linbox.
Please forgive my previous message. I found out what is the problem.
The reason
is because I am also working o
On Jan 13, 8:08 am, François Bissey wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:35:16 Craig Citro wrote:
>
> > > If you work on getting this merged upstream as a bug that's a good
> > > selling point for us. We can produce a patched ebuild and possibly
> > > get it accepted.
> > > Do you have a bug tracking n
Em 3 de fevereiro de 2010 19:00, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> On Jan 13, 8:08 am, François Bissey wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:35:16 Craig Citro wrote:
>>
>> > > If you work on getting this merged upstream as a bug that's a good
>> >
Hi,
Some are known problems due to using different versions of certain
packages, example:
-%<-
File "/usr/share/sage/devel/doc/en/numerical_sage/cvxopt.rst", line 57:
sage: print(A)
Expected:
SIZE: (5,5)
(0, 0) 2.e+00
(1, 0) 3.e+00
(0, 1) 3.e+00
2010/3/2 François Bissey :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some are known problems due to using different versions of certain
>> packages, example:
>>
>> -%<-
>> File "/usr/share/sage/devel/doc/en/numerical_sage/cvxopt.rst", line 57:
>> sage: print(A)
>> Expected:
>> SIZE: (5,5)
>> (0, 0) 2.e
2010/3/3 William Stein :
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>>> Right now it takes over 1.5 seconds every time.
>>> wst...@sage:~$ time sage -c "print factor(2010)"
>>> 2 * 3 * 5 * 67
>>> real 0m1.535s
>>> user 0m1.140s
>>> sys 0m0.460s
>>
>> Personaly I don
2010/3/4 Simon King :
> Hi!
>
> On Mar 4, 8:35 am, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> [...]
>> I think we can have the names there without importing all the code
>> behind everything. With tab completion, a huge global namespace isn't
>> that bad.
>
> How would this be possible, technically? I mean, is th
2010/3/6 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Mar 5, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Hi Dima,
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>>
>>> if it's PARI-dependent, it makes sense to upgrade PARI to the latest
>>> version.
>>
>> Perhaps upgrading Pari could be a goal for Sage 5.0?
Em 6 de março de 2010 13:29, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> 2010/3/6 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Mar 5, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dima,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>>>
>>
2010/3/14 Kasper Peeters :
>> That review process is what killed the Debian sagemath package
>> -- Upgrading during the review process
>> sends you to the back of the queue, and by a year after my original
>> submission, I had left MIT graduate school to start a startup, and I no
>> longer had the
2010/3/18 kstueve :
> Does anyone have information on the maximum size of an array of
> doubles in C? I seem to be getting abnormal results using elements
> past the first 1e6. What is the standard way to deal with very large
> (millions to billions of elements) arrays of data in C?
> Kevin Stuev
2010/3/23 François Bissey :
> Hi,
Hi,
> I am trying to find the root of some test failure with the maxima interface
> on the port of sage of Gentoo and I have just read the content of
> maxima-noreadline:
> #!/bin/sh
> SAGE_CLISP_DISABLE_READLINE_HACK="yes"; export
> SAGE_CLISP_DISABLE_READLINE
2010/5/11 Jan Groenewald :
> Hi
Hi,
> On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 09:55:02AM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
>> Sounds like Dan Drake has a simple test working on a clean 10.04
>> install (thanks, Dan!), so that is good news, I believe. If you want
>> to test your setup, in the notebook, try something si
2010/5/12 Jan Groenewald :
> Hi
Hi,
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 05:42:52PM -0300, Paulo C?sar Pereira de Andrade
> wrote:
>> > java version "1.6.0_18"
>> > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.8) (6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1)
>> > OpenJDK Client VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode, sharing)
>> > java.io.Fil
2010/5/14 François Bissey :
> We had a long standing problem in both Gentoo and Mandriva
> with the following test
> sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/combinat/iet/strata.py"
> which is failing for us using the system python shipped with our
> distributions.
> As it turns out it is because the py
2010/5/16 cschwan :
> I already tried valgrind but it did not work - how do I exactly use
> it ? When I run
>
> sage -valgrind -t -force_lib "devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/
> categories/examples/algebras_with_basis.rst"
>
> I get:
>
> -
I did not follow the history about mpir and gmp, so forgive me for
not knowing the reasons behind the fork, and the childish behavior of
developers.
But this smells somewhat like what I saw in another case, when Xorg
took over XFree86.
Short story, Xorg people just like to tell others and t
2010/5/18 Bill Hart :
> So what do you suggest as a solution then?
Peace and Love!
That being said, people work better when there is competition. As
long as there is "balance in power", and mutual respect/trust, things
should just work. But that is something that even with infinite
multiple p
2010/5/22 cschwan :
> @Willem: I took the suppression file from Sage's valgrind.spkg - this
> filtered a lot meesages.
>
> @Paulo:
>
> valgrind --db-attach=yes --freelist-vol=1 python
> /usr/share/sage/local/bin/sage-ipython
>
> does not work for me - valgrind prints only a message while s
2010/6/13 ManDay :
> I too haven't got JMol to work in the NB, although it works fine as
> the standalone application when run from the commandline. I don't see
> how the site you mentioned would help. Installing JAVA was no problem
> and it works just fine, including JMol applets on the jmol.sourc
2010/6/30 cschwan :
>
>
> On 30 Jun., 16:05, "Georg S. Weber"
> wrote:
>> Great work!
>>
>> Actually, it makes me think about installing Gentoo just to test this
>> (I do know I don't have the time for this, but it does wet my mouth
>> nevertheless).
>
> I take this as a compliment - thanks !
>
>>
Hi,
Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what causes several
problems in my sagemath package. I was in vacation during most of
Mandriva 2010.1 freeze, and did not fully test the package for some
time, but I am working on an update for it; basically an 's/import
mpmath/import sympy.mpmath
2010/7/16 François Bissey :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what causes several
>> problems in my sagemath package. I was in vacation during most of
>> Mandriva 2010.1 freeze, and did not fully test the package for some
>> time, but I am working on an update for it; basic
2010/7/17 François Bissey :
>> As an aside, if two upstream packages include another upstream
>> package (e.g. both include GMP) what does Sage do? Are there
>> two copies of GMP? They could have different versions of the
>> same package since project 1 could have stopped at one version
>> and proj
2010/8/5 cschwan :
Hi,
> There are six python files which would need a patch and more than five
> (we need only small numbers of scripts from sage_scripts). You may
> have look and the patches here:
I agree that a s|SAGE_ROOT/foo|SAGE_FOO| is required, that is, not only
for SAGE_LOCAL :-)
2010/11/13 Simon King :
> Hi Dave!
>
> On 12 Nov., 16:22, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>> On 11/12/10 03:10 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> I meant to say Sage is NOT the place to
>>
>> look. vmstat, sar (possibly top) are worth looking at.
>
> top would not help. It simply says that my process is
Hi,
I updated the mandriva sagemath package to 4.7.2. For quite some time, I think
one year++, updates are basically a rediff of some patches, but while
the package
initially had a lot of doctest failures, then gone to a "gold age" of
like 3-5 doctest
failures for a long time, now after every
2011/11/7 Francois Bissey :
> Hi Paulo,
>
> You are using python-2.7 right? In #9958 I have a list of patches
> as long as my arm to deal with the numerical noise and changes
> in warnings.
Yes, python 2.7.2. Thanks for the hint on the patches. They appear
to address exactly a good share of the
Em 8 de novembro de 2011 04:20, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> 2011/11/7 Francois Bissey :
>
>> Hi Paulo,
>>
>> You are using python-2.7 right? In #9958 I have a list of patches
>> as long as my arm to deal with the numerical noise and changes
>>
2011/11/8 Francois Bissey :
[...]
> I don't get any of that. I suspect there may be an issue with gmp/mpir. But
> I have really no clue about the glibc problem, you are using mpmath-0.17
> I expect.
Yes, mpmath-0.17.
This should be an issue with gmp / pylong / ntl conversions, in
the sage/c
2011/11/8 Francois Bissey :
> Hi Paulo,
>
> with gmp5 I had to do the following for sage to even compile in
> sage/rings/integer.so precisely:
> sed -i "s:__GMP_BITS_PER_MP_LIMB:GMP_LIMB_BITS:g" sage/rings/integer.pyx
Yes, I have been using a similar approach (rediffing patch from time to time)
2011/11/8 Francois Bissey :
>> 2011/11/8 Francois Bissey :
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > I don't get any of that. I suspect there may be an issue with gmp/mpir.
>> > But I have really no clue about the glibc problem, you are using
>> > mpmath-0.17 I expect.
>>
>> Yes, mpmath-0.17.
>>
>> This should be an
Em 9 de novembro de 2011 00:29, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> 2011/11/8 Francois Bissey :
>>> 2011/11/8 Francois Bissey :
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> > I don't get any of that. I suspect there may be an issue with gmp/mpir.
>>
2011/11/9 Francois Bissey :
>> Em 9 de novembro de 2011 00:29, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>
>> escreveu:
>> > 2011/11/8 Francois Bissey :
>> >>> 2011/11/8 Francois Bissey :
>> >>>
>> >>> [...]
>> >>>
&
2011/11/9 Francois Bissey :
>> 2011/11/9 Francois Bissey :
>
>>
>> Maybe setting MPMATH_NOGMPY is not enough to prevent it to
>> call to gmpy "init" function that calls mp_set_memory_functions.
>>
>> I will try to debug a bit further, in the worst case, I can resubmit a
>> sagemath package with
2011/11/9 Francois Bissey :
>>
>> rsync://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/pub/linux/MandrivaLinux/devel/co
>
>> oker/x86_64/media/contrib/release/python-gmpy-1.14-1mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm
>> instalando python-gmpy-1.14-1mdv2011.0.x86_64.rpm a partir de
>> /var/cache/urpmi/rpms
>> Preparando...
>
> Inte
Em 9 de novembro de 2011 23:24, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> But, since gmpy call to mp_set_memory_functions is kind of redundant,
> as it just ends up calling malloc/realloc/free anyway, with this patch:
Err, this patch probably should require an environment variable, b
Em 9 de novembro de 2011 23:27, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> Em 9 de novembro de 2011 23:24, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> escreveu:
>
>> But, since gmpy call to mp_set_memory_functions is kind of redundant,
>> as it just ends up calling malloc/realloc/f
2011/11/11 Francois Bissey :
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:59 PM, frosty wrote:
>> > I have just discovered Sage & want to know if there are any folks here
>> > working on making a Debian version that would work without having to
>> > compile all the parts. i.e. use the needed files, apps & librar
2012/1/22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith :
> On 01/21/2012 08:05 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>
>> I am able to build sage on FreeBSD. I have attached a tar file which
>> contains a "port" to build sage on FreeBSD. (FreeBSD users will know
>> what I mean by a "port.")
>>
>> It does seem to work,
2012/1/22 François Bissey :
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:31:34 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> One thing I want to rule out is that the problem is created by python.
>> FreeBSD has a working python version 2.7. How do I tell the sage build
>> to use the FreeBSD python rather than building its own?
2012/2/4 Julien Puydt :
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded my AC100 to (a snapshot of the forthcoming) ubuntu precise,
> thinking it woud perhaps raise new issues, and that would be interesting to
> detect them beforehand.
>
> And indeed, pari doesn't compile!
>
> One of the files gives an assembler file which d
Em 19 de outubro de 2011 23:33, Dan Drake escreveu:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 at 03:17AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
>> I think we've fixed the last remaining bugs in the flask notebook.
>> Can people please test the new flask notebook, either at
>> test.sagenb.org, or by following the instructions here
Em 29 de fevereiro de 2012 19:24, Julien Puydt
escreveu:
> Le mercredi 29 février, Jan Groenewald a écrit:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 29 February 2012 22:21, Julien Puydt
>> wrote:
>>
>> > If it only built what it *needs to build*, not what it *needs*, then
>> > there would be a gain too. Let me stress again
Em 10 de abril de 2012 05:05, Gustavo de Oliveira
escreveu:
> I have recently uploaded to the trac server a Portuguese translation of "A
> Tour of Sage" and "Tutorial":
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12502
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12822
>
> If you read Portuguese,
Em 10 de abril de 2012 13:50, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> Em 10 de abril de 2012 05:05, Gustavo de Oliveira
> escreveu:
>> I have recently uploaded to the trac server a Portuguese translation of "A
>> Tour of Sage" and "Tutorial":
>>
Em 23 de abril de 2012 16:54, mmarco escreveu:
> Ok, switching to a newer version of ubuntu solved the eclib problem.
> Now i have another one. Building the sage package i get this error
> message:
>
> Building modified file sage/ext/interpreters/wrapper_el.pyx.
> Executing 296 commands (using 4 t
Em 24 de abril de 2012 13:46, mmarco escreveu:
>
> Nevermind, it worked by mounting an empty tmpfs as shm device
Good to know the real issue :-) My workaround only works for
missing /dev/shm. Missing /dev/pts on build chroots I managed
to bug at Mandriva sometime ago, to get it properly mounted
Hi,
Sorry if this was already asked/answered as I did not read all threads
about sagemath
and jmol. This is related to mandriva sagemath package, but,
downloading the binary for
mandriva 2009.0 I get the same results.
I have this strange behavior, where in both notebook and tutorial
sample, it ap
Em 23 de novembro de 2010 16:21, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> Hi,
Doing the bad netiquette of replying to myself, but now I am sure this
is not specific to my sagemath package.
> Sorry if this was already asked/answered as I did not read all threads
> about sagemath
&
Hi,
I made a patch that allowed it to generate documentation and build, but
it just gives the same errors when attempting to execute sage. For example:
-%<-
$ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.6.1, Release Date: 2011-01-11
Em 18 de janeiro de 2011 14:55, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I made a patch that allowed it to generate documentation and build, but
> it just gives the same errors when attempting to execute sage. For example:
>
Em 19 de janeiro de 2011 14:57, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> Em 18 de janeiro de 2011 14:55, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> escreveu:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made a patch that allowed it to generate documentation and build, but
>> it just gives the same err
2011/1/27 François Bissey :
> Hi all,
I am delaying a Mandriva sagemath 4.6.1 due to related reasons,
and may not release it if sagemath 4.6.2 is released soon :-). Since
Mandriva cooker is using python 2.7.1 and cython 0.14, I needed to
use a custom cython 0.13, but am trying to correct some is
This may be of interest
https://www.theopensourceway.org/wiki/How_to_tell_if_a_FLOSS_project_is_doomed_to_FAIL
and should explain why sage is not included and/or built from
sources in any major distro. Well, I make rpms for Mandriva,
and there is the gentoo port...
My last work on a sagemath
2011/3/9 Harald Schilly :
I understand that this kind of post, besides attempting to state it is a
friendly one, could cause more harm than good. The TV show probably
would have a small specialized audience :-) But the rants/discussions,
and ego wars (not so much as in some other projects) that
2011/3/9 Francois Bissey :
>> This may be of interest
>>
>>
>> https://www.theopensourceway.org/wiki/How_to_tell_if_a_FLOSS_project_is_doo
>> med_to_FAIL
>>
>> and should explain why sage is not included and/or built from
>> sources in any major distro. Well, I make rpms for Mandriva,
>> and ther
2011/3/25 Jason Grout :
> On 3/25/11 7:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please find bugs in http://flask.sagenb.org. Is it slow? Fast?
>> Broken in *any* way at all?
>
>
> Jmol doesn't work, as far as we can tell. We aren't sure why, though. Kudos
> to whoever can figure out why jmol
2011/3/26 Jonathan :
> This problem with Jmol appears to be multifaceted.
> 1) The path to Jmol looks strange, although the error messages do
> appear to come from Jmol.
> 2) It looks like something is being added to the top of the script
> file for Jmol and confusing it.
> 3) Could also related to
2011/4/5 William Stein :
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
>> Great job Jason and Mike. Seems the Jmol problem is fixed. At least it
>> works here on ubuntu and firefox 3.6 and chromium 10 with sun's java.
>>
>> I pulled Jason's changes into my repo, so every one who pulled from me
>>
2011/4/11 Dr. David Kirkby :
> The latest stable release of gcc is 4.6.0. Does anyone know of any problems
> building Sage apart from these 4 I am aware of.
>
> 1) Singular fails to build
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11084
It is working for me in Mandriva, but in Mandriva it shoul
Em 5 de abril de 2011 21:02, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> 2011/4/5 William Stein :
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
>>> Great job Jason and Mike. Seems the Jmol problem is fixed. At least it
>>> works here on ubuntu and firefox 3.6 and
2011/4/9 Francois Bissey :
> It turns out that warnings are not visible to the end users anymore.
> This is according to the python documentation:
> http://docs.python.org/library/warnings.html
> Section 27.6.5 to be precise.
> Actually more explicit in http://docs.python.org/using/cmdline.html :
>
2011/6/1 Francois Bissey :
>> 2011/4/9 Francois Bissey :
>> > It turns out that warnings are not visible to the end users anymore.
>> > This is according to the python documentation:
>> > http://docs.python.org/library/warnings.html
>> > Section 27.6.5 to be precise.
>> > Actually more explicit in
Em 1 de junho de 2011 18:22, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> If I understand it correctly, at least for this particular case:
>
> sage/libs/singular/groebner_strategy.pyx:GroebnerStrategy(SageObject)._parent
> =>
> sag
2011/6/2 Francois Bissey :
>> Em 1 de junho de 2011 18:22, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>
>> escreveu:
>> > If I understand it correctly, at least for this particular case:
>> >
>> >
>> > sage/libs/singular/groebner_strategy.pyx:Groebne
Em 2 de junho de 2011 11:15, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> 2011/6/2 Francois Bissey :
>>> Em 1 de junho de 2011 18:22, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>
>>> escreveu:
>>> > If I understand it correctly, at least for this particular
2012/7/19 Jeroen Demeyer :
> This is most likely a bug in GCC.
> Could you try to install the package
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/gcc-4.7.1.spkg
> and compile again?
>
> This is to check whether using vanilla gcc-4.7.1 (as opposed to
> Debian's) works.
A possible patch
Hi,
I need help from a Fedora packager for the proper review procedures.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877651
I am asking because people searching for a review will most likely
run away when looking at it due to the complexity :-) and it is better
to have someone with som
I opened a ticket in fedora to bundle cython, ipython and pexpect
for the hopefully very close, fedora sagemath package, see
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/238
cython hopefully should not be an issue, and I said it should
require roughly 6 months to be able to use system ipython.
About pexpe
2013/4/23 Felix Salfelder :
> Hi There
Hi,
Sorry for only commenting in this thread this late; I have been very
busy with my work and should still be for a few months, but always
find some time to contribute and work on some personal projects :-)
I had a sagemath review request for Fedora
I think this may have been working somewhat of by accident
before, because it says 'extern "C"' in one place and in another
say '// sorry, if you want a C version, feel free to add it'
I delayed a bit sagemath 6.4 update due to some dependencies
needing to be updated in Fedora, in the meantime
.9.2 is shipped in sage and a number of people are using it
>> I would be looking at any flags you are using. I may have a shot at
>> gcc 4.9.2 here.
>>
>> Francois
>>
>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 11:44:09 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>> > I think th
2015-06-12 6:18 GMT-03:00 Jeroen Demeyer :
> On 2015-06-11 10:31, Julien Puydt wrote:
>>
>> Open software is about cooperation.
>
> Of course. The question is: what should we do if upstream does not want to
> cooperate? I don't want to call names in this thread, but I have proposed
> patches to man
Hi,
I believe this should be one of the best places to ask,
about any estimative of when it will be available.
I have sagemath 6.5 packaged in Fedora. Today I started
implementing a "pari_wrap.c" and "pari_wrap.h" interface
in libcsage, but noticed it would not be a trivial patch to
create
2015-06-21 0:21 GMT-03:00 Francois Bissey :
> There are two factors here:
> 1) libcsage is gone in the upcoming sage 6.8.
Ok. I would prefer it kept around as a "generic" place to add
wrappers, or better saying "hacks" :)
> 2) I bit the bullet and used the pari git snapshot used in sage
> for s
2015-08-27 16:20 GMT-03:00 Jeroen Demeyer :
> If you are a native French, German, Portuguese, Russian speaker,
> could you please translate the following short paragraph for #19106:
Hi, pt translation below
> For some GAP functionality, you should install two optional
> Sage packages. This can
100 matches
Mail list logo
