[sage-devel] Re: Mac-like application for Sage on Mac

tebooks should be stored in some place that will be saved across upgrades/new installs. This shouldn't be hard to fix though. > Does this sound like it would be useful to the Sage community if I > could get it working? +1 -Ivan Andrus --~--~-~--~~~---~--~

[sage-devel] Re: Mac-like application for Sage on Mac

> I think the Fluid idea is brilliant! I've actually used it before > and never thought to use it with SAGE. Can you post instructions on > how you set it up? Create an application (hereafter referred to as Sage.app) pointing to https://localhost:8000/ or http://localhost:8000/ I don't know i

[sage-devel] Mac application licensing question

Fluid has been updated fixing the largest (in my mind) bug. Therefore, I have created a version of Sage.app which I am happy enough with to share with people. I have added instructions on the wiki at http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageMacApplication and would like to add a pre-packaged version

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

> Just for clarification, you're only talking about distributiong the > OUTPUT of > a non-GPL'd program? You're not distributing the program itself at > all but > just the output of the program, right? Correct. I guess it's confusing since the output of said program _is_ a program. >> Wi

[sage-devel] Re: Mac application licensing question

wants I am also looking into adding a browser to Platypus. I think that may be a superior solution, but it will undoubtedly be more work. On a slightly different note, does it count as distributing it if I only give it to a friend? In other

[sage-devel] Applying for a Ph.D. to work on Sage

all? How about a letter of recommendation from my employer (as well as from professors)? All thoughts and comments are welcome (including pointing to a page on the wiki that I didn't find or something). Thanks, Ivan Andrus --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To pos

[sage-devel] Re: Applying for a Ph.D. to work on Sage

On Sep 17, 2008, at 10:51 AM, William Stein wrote: > So the short answer is that you could (and should :-) ) > work on Sage a lot in nearly any Ph.D. program in the world. I guess my concern is really that I have known several professors who have the attitude of "why don't you just use Maple,

[sage-devel] Re: Clarification of Sage and GPL

On May 6, 2009, at 12:09 AM, mabshoff wrote: > Note that any GPLed codebase like Singular or pari would also be viral > to high level code and I cannot believe that this is the way the GPL > is intended. Anything using readline, i.e. IPython, would be infected, > too, and that goes way too far IM

[sage-devel] Re: /bin/sh: source: not found

William Stein writes: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Dr. David Kirkby > wrote: >> >> I keep seeing the above message from Sage on Solaris. Is this normal on >> linux? /bin/sh does exist on Solaris, as does /usr/bin/sh, since >> /usr/bin and /bin are linked. > > I think > >   "/bin/sh: sourc

[sage-devel] sage-open sage-osx-open and sage-native-execute

Is there a reason to have two files that are functionally equivalent namely local/bin/sage-open local/bin/sage-osx-open and why are they slightly different than local/bin/sage-native-execute namely sage-native-execute replaces the variables whereas sage-open merely unsets them. Also they

[sage-devel] Re: Implementing the tropical semiring

On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:52 PM, luisfe wrote: > Hi, > > Quite a long time ago, somebody posted this > >> Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:36:10 -0700 >> >> I am in need of free software that will work with polynomials over >> the >> Tropical semiring. I was unable to find anything suitable, so I >> thought I w

[sage-devel] Automatic Uploading/Opening files with Sage.app

In the past there was discussion about "automatic uploading" of sws files and such on local servers so that double clicking an sws file would do the right thing. See for example here: http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg19059.html which for some reason has all the mes

[sage-devel] Automatic Uploading/Opening files with Sage.app

I think I sent this from the wrong email address last time, since I don't see it on google groups. If you already got this I apologize. In the past there was discussion about "automatic uploading" of sws files and such on local servers so that double clicking an sws file would do the right

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage 4.2.1 on 64bit mac 10.6.2 and the plot function crashes

On Nov 19, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Aivo Jürgenson wrote: >> What happens when you type >> >> sage: plot(sin(x),0,4) >> >> on the command line? > >> /Applications/sage/sage > -- > | Sage Version 4.2.1, Release Date: 2009-11-14

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage program icons

On Nov 27, 2009, at 12:22 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Nov 26, 10:13 pm, Christopher Olah > wrote: >> That's awesome. > > Thanks ;) > > The 16x16 one looks ugly, but that's no wonder. But the svg one and > since I know they are maybe a bit larger, I also thought about some > additional tweaks

Re: [sage-devel] Mac Launcher

On Dec 18, 2009, at 7:38 AM, William Stein wrote: > I wonder if somebody who understands the mac launcher for SAge could comment > on > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7700 Done. I accepted the ticket and should get around to it after finals are done. -Ivan -- To post to this

[sage-devel] Re: A Mac OS X Sage Launcher

> PS: The final step in the whole saga would be to use Interface Builder > to make, well, an interface (which presumably would just add some kind > of Aqua niceness to a terminal session implanted in the interface?). > I have no idea how to do this, but > http://www.iwu.edu/~cskiadas/Apps/index.h

[sage-devel] Re: A Mac OS X Sage Launcher

On Jan 30, 2009, at 8:47 AM, kcrisman wrote: > Anyway, it sounds like what mabshoff really needs is just the best > tarball possible to then be able to drop a Sage build into for a fully > functional .app bundle. If that was created just once with Platypus > by someone else, presumably for every

[sage-devel] Re: A Mac OS X Sage Launcher

On Feb 3, 2009, at 7:19 PM, kcrisman wrote: >> So thanks to Karl-Dieter and Ivan for finally makeing this a reality >> since we have been talking about this since ye old Sage 2.5 at least >> when I posted some crummy manually assembled app. > > You're welcome, and thanks to Ivan as well, as this

[sage-devel] Re: Making sws files clickable?

On Mar 23, 2009, at 5:39 PM, ulfarsson wrote: > would it be possible to make the notebook files clickable in the > following sense: > If I have a file test.sws at /user/Documents/mySAGEfiles that I click > then SAGE opens a new > session by opening up a notebook server using the files at /user/ >

[sage-devel] sage -c slow

I recently decided to make some OS X services which use sage e.g. to simplify an expression. So that I can select some text, and simplify it in place. This is ridiculously easy to do with Automator and sage -c, but the problem is that it's unbearably slow. Part of it may be Automator, but if

Re: [sage-devel] sage -c slow

On Jan 6, 2010, at 8:50 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> I recently decided to make some OS X services which use sage e.g. to >> simplify an expression. So that I can select some text, and simplify it in >> place. This is

[sage-devel] sage -preparse fails

In 4.3.1.alpha1 (built from scratch on OS X 10.6) I get the following (from running sagetex): $ cat sagetest.sage ## This file (sagetest.sage) was *autogenerated* from the file sagetest.tex. import sagetex _st_ = sagetex.SageTeXProcessor('sagetest') try: _st_.plot(0, format='notprovided', _p_=p

[sage-devel] Potential Mac application

It somehow escaped my attention until recently that Fluid (a site specific browser that I use a lot) was open sourced at under the Apache license . I have hacked together a quick demo of what is possible using a site specific browser. Currently there are many p

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Web Service / UI

On Jan 29, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > The issue is that the Sage window is mixed up with all the other browser > windows, with irrelevant menu items, doesn't have its own icon in the dock, > and the Sage session doesn't stop when the window is closed. Now there are > several adv

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Web Service / UI

On Jan 29, 2010, at 12:21 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > Andy Somogyi wrote: >> Hi All >> This was originally a discussion of how to make Sage a better desktop app. > > I've wondered what the possibility was of making a Firefox extension that > customized firefox to be an all-in-one Sage app. I thin

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Web Service / UI

On Jan 29, 2010, at 7:27 PM, David Joyner wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Jan 29, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >>> The issue is that the Sage window is mixed up with all the other browser >>> windows, with irrele

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Web Service / UI

On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:38 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:22 PM, David Joyner wrote: >> sage -i /Users/wdj/sagefiles/fluidium-app.spkg >> >> gave >> >> (lots of lines deleted) >> >> x fluidium-spkg/.hg/store/data/spkg-install.i > > The person making the spkg made it incorrec

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Web Service / UI

On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:17 PM, David Joyner wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:38 AM, William Stein wrote: > >>> The person making the spkg made it incorrectly. >>> Put the relevant sour

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Web Service / UI

On Jan 31, 2010, at 2:21 AM, David Joyner wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:17 PM, David Joyner wrote: > > ... > >>>> http://math.byu.edu/~gvol/files/fluidium_app-0.1.spkg >>>> >>> >>&

Re: [sage-devel] Prototype Sage Desktop App

On Jan 31, 2010, at 10:29 PM, Andy Somogyi wrote: > Hello All > > Here is a link to a prototype sage desktop app for the Mac. > > http://numerator.sourceforge.net/SageApp.dmg > > This is a first prototype, it has little functionality currently, will > probably crash, almost certainly has numer

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Opening a .sws file

I don't think it would actually be that hard to add to the Mac Application (though I haven't tried it) if there were such a command. To my knowledge however there is not–I asked a few months ago. It would be nice if there were a way to do this. I won't have time to work on this for a while,

[sage-devel] Bash completion for Sage

Looking at changing the option style for sage got me looking for tab completion in bash (e.g. ./sage --n[TAB] => ./sage --notebook). I thought there was already something written but, I couldn't find anything and so I threw something together. It's very inefficient (it parses the output of `

Re: [sage-devel] Application to open sage notebook on Mac

On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Peter Horn wrote: > Regarding the "making steps 4-6 easier" from the readme... > > Using Automator I made an .app that > > 1. opens Terminal > 2. opens sage (assuming you dragged the sage folder into / > Applications) > 3. opens the notebook interface (local) > > It

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage OSX Clickable App

vim, ... instead of the likes of Eclipse, >>> XCode, VisualStudio, ... (just like me, I use plain jEdit for coding) >>> >>> Back to the "Sage App" ticket(s)/patch(es). One problem is, that there >>> would be only one icon left on the desktop/in the pro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage OSX Clickable App

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: > > I don't think that's actually the case. If the disk image we > distribute is HFS+ it should allow us to hard link directories so that > each application can have it's own copy of the sage directory, without >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage OSX Clickable App

On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:08 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Georg S. Weber wrote: >>> On 10 Jun., 02:37, Jason Grout wrote: Karl-Dieter just showed me how to get the OSX App built using sage -bdist:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage OSX Clickable App

On Jun 21, 2010, at 8:34 AM, kcrisman wrote: >> Okay, I created a simple application (none of the copyright is set for >> example) that does the following: >> >> 1. On launch it runs sage -notebook (which will open the default browser >> etc. (unless there is a server running)) > > This would b

[sage-devel] Clickable OS X app for 4.4.4

I don't know if there is work being done to create the clickable applications for OS X for this release (I know being release manager is hard enough), so I took the liberty of creating one, for intel at least. I created them on my MacBook Pro: Darwin parduc.home 10.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Clickable OS X app for 4.4.4

On Jun 26, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 6/24/10 8:53 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> I don't know if there is work being done to create the clickable >> applications for OS X for this release (I know being release manager is hard >> enough), so I took the li

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Clickable OS X app for 4.4.4

ut more experimental. Please read the README and give me any feedback you have. I would have put them both on the same disk image if I could figure out a safe way to share SAGE_ROOT without duplicating the data. -Ivan On Jun 26, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: > On Jun 26, 2010, a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Clickable OS X app for 4.4.4

On Jun 29, 2010, at 9:08 AM, kcrisman wrote: >> sage-deluxe-4.4.4-i386-Darwin.dmg >> has the "new" application--it should be nicer, but more >> experimental. Please read the README and give me any feedback you have. > > Thanks, Ivan! This looks like a monstrous improvement on the > sur

[sage-devel] Case sensitive file systems WAS: Clickable OS X app for 4.4.4

On Jun 29, 2010, at 10:41 AM, kcrisman wrote: >>> So I made another folder to put it in, copied it there. The same >>> thing happened, even though that folder was otherwise empty - message >>> "You can’t copy “Sage” because it has the same name as another item on >>> the destination volume, and th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Clickable OS X app for 4.4.4

On Jun 29, 2010, at 10:41 AM, kcrisman wrote: >>> So I made another folder to put it in, copied it there. The same >>> thing happened, even though that folder was otherwise empty - message >>> "You can’t copy “Sage” because it has the same name as another item on >>> the destination volume, and t

Re: [sage-devel] Patches overwriting patches in singular

On Jun 29, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > I've been chasing my tail much of today, trying to make Singular play ball. > Managed to find out one for for sure. Someone has written a patch to > src/Singular/Makefile.in, then someone else has written one to the same file > and overwro

Re: [sage-devel] Vote on making GNU patch a standard package

+1 -Ivan On Jul 1, 2010, at 5:18 AM, David Kirkby wrote: > I propose that we make GNU patch a standard package, so that patches > to Sage can be made in a more sensible manner than using 'cp' as now. > (There's no point in 'patch' being optional at all, as it would be > needed when building Sage

Re: [sage-devel] Which IDE do you use to write code for sage?

> I use EMACS. +1 >> What do you like about the IDE? (maybe a small list of key features) > > Emacs is awesome in infinitely many ways. But only countably many ways :) >> What do you hate (or don't like) about the IDE? > > Lack of something like XCode's "codesense", maybe. This should be a

[sage-devel] UserAgent of Mac App

e case William? I would really like to get something distributed by default for OS X, but have only sporadic times in which I can work on Sage right now. -Ivan Andrus -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage

Re: [sage-devel] OSX Clickable App

> Continuing the discussion that dribbled off into nothing: > http://groups.google.mn/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/b765738766448b5d Thanks for resurrecting this. Hopefully we can get it to go somewhere. > I have lots of students with macs now, and some are interested in getting > Sage

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Clickable App

On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:13 PM, kcrisman wrote: > On Aug 31, 12:01 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >> Continuing the discussion that dribbled off into >> nothing:http://groups.google.mn/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/b765738... >> > If we can make it so that SAGE_APP_BUNDLE=yes becomes the default >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Clickable App

On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 8/31/10 12:40 PM, kcrisman wrote: >>> I'm uploading a dmg of 4.5.2 made from the current sage -bdist script to >>> sage.math (46% done). I planned on giving that URL to students. Would >>> you suggest giving a link to your dmg instead? >> >> T

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Clickable App

On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > When I click "stop server", and then "start server", I see this error message > in the log: > > Setting environment variables > Warning: Attempted to overwrite SAGE_ROOT environment variable > Checking install location > Traceback (most recent cal

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Clickable App

On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: > On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Jason Grout wrote: >> When I click "stop server", and then "start server", I see this error >> message in the log: >> >> Setting environment variables >> Warning:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Clickable App

On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:40 PM, kcrisman wrote: > On Sep 1, 6:58 am, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >>> On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Jason Grout wrote: >>>> When I click "stop server", and then "start serve

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Clickable App

There is a patch up at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9873 implementing the coolest Sage Mac application since the last one. Of course, it won't be the ultimate until #8473 is fixed. Since the code is all new, I would appreciate any feedback even if you don't feel comfortable actual

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Safari and Trac viewing

On Sep 9, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Sep 9, 9:19 pm, kcrisman wrote: >> Does anyone sometimes get weird behavior on Safari when viewing Trac >> tickets? > > yes, on my old PowerBook G4 I get this with Safari once in a while. I saw this just the other day on Omniweb (which proba

Re: [sage-devel] Re: OSX Clickable App

Sorry, I thought I had sent this earlier. On Sep 11, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Dan Drake wrote: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 at 10:13AM -0700, kcrisman wrote: >> It is. I've also been testing this - you should try out the very >> latest version: >> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/iandrus/ >> There are sti

Re: [sage-devel] Re: can't name a script "new.sage"?

On Sep 21, 2011, at 8:53 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 11:26:39 AM UTC-7, Felix Salfelder wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:11:57AM -0700, Tom Boothby wrote: > > I capitulate on the hidden file idea, in favor of putting 'em in > > ~/.sage/ though one might note th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Code style guidelines

On Oct 24, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 10/24/11 12:07 PM, leif wrote: >> On 24 Okt., 17:33, Jason Grout wrote: >>> Here is one of the big situations when I like trailing spaces: >>> >>> def hello():$ >>> print 'hi'$ >>> $ >>> print 'bye'$ >>> >>> To me, it's annoying

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Code style guidelines

On Oct 27, 2011, at 2:38 AM, Keshav Kini wrote: > Would it be possible to configure emacs to pretend there is space there, or > something like that? I imagine it should be easy to add something to ~/.emacs > which upon loading a .py or .pyx file searches for blocks of empty lines, > checks previ

Re: [sage-devel] Re: The "sage -sh" shell prompt: any objections to shortening it?

On Nov 5, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote: >>> case "$SHELL_NAME" in > > It's not that terribly important, by this wouldn't work for my ZShell prompt > because i use more advanced features in my prompt. In particular, my prompt > displays the revision number of the hg repository I'm in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: or sage-5.0? (Re: [sage-release] Next release: sage-4.7.3 or sage-4.8?)

On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: > > You'll find here http://clefagreg.dnsalias.org/ a distribution aimed at > them. And in fact, several distributions, to be installed on a usb key and > booted, precisely because the stu

[sage-devel] Re: Mac app seems to be causing some trouble on Lion

On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:21 AM, kcrisman wrote: > See > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/740/app-installation-problem-on-mac-os-x-lion > > Is it possible that Sage will work on Lion if compiled on Snow > Leopard, but not the app? At the same time, using the command line > says that it can't find I

[sage-devel] Sage iPhone app

I have finally put in the time needed to get the iPhone app to a point where I think it can be released. As before you can try it out in the simulator by building from https://bitbucket.org/gvol/sage-iphone-app/ If you want to try it on your iDevice I can get you a certificate off list. Of cou

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage on iPhone 4?

> > There is an ipod/iphone app that was being developed, but I don't know the > status of it. Ivan Andrus was working on it. I'm getting ready to release it. I'm not sure how long Apple's review process will take. See my other email. -Ivan -- To post

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage iPhone app

On Jan 17, 2012, at 11:26 PM, kcrisman wrote: > On Jan 17, 4:18 pm, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> I have finally put in the time needed to get the iPhone app to a point where >> I think it can be released. >> >> As before you can try it out in the simulator by building &

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage iPhone app

On Jan 18, 2012, at 12:56 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/17/12 5:33 PM, kcrisman wrote: >> > Of course any bug reports or suggestions are very welcome. In particular > checking my initial examples would be helpful. Some screen shots are > available athttp://boxen.math.washington.edu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage iPhone app

On Jan 18, 2012, at 3:07 PM, kcrisman wrote: >>> Of course any bug reports or suggestions are very welcome. In >>> particular checking my initial examples would be helpful. Some screen >>> shots are available athttp://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/iandrus/ >> >> Nice! >> >>>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: aleph vs. singlecell and internal server error

On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:23 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jason Grout > wrote: >> On 1/18/12 4:05 PM, Volker Braun wrote: >>> >>> In the recent thread about running the singlecell server on port 80, >>> William hinted that aleph is supposed to be that. But I can't get

[sage-devel] Should we unset SAGE_ENV_SOURCED in sage-native-execute?

Georg S Weber found a problem with the Mac app [1] which is caused by running sage via an applescript via sage-native-execute after having sourced sage-env. What happens is the variable SAGE_ENV_SOURCED is set to 1 and then the applescript runs opening an Terminal window and calling sage. So w

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Should we unset SAGE_ENV_SOURCED in sage-native-execute?

On Jan 22, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > sage-native-execute should remove all traces of Sage in from the environment, > but there is definitely stuff falling through the cracks. But I don't > understand why one would want to start sage via sage-native-execute, unless > one wants to r

[sage-devel] "Active tickets" report shows all tickets

Trac admins, Running the "Assigned, Active Tickets by Owner" report [1] the very first ticket (#6134) as well as a few others that I checked were actually closed and there are 12170 active tickets which surely must be all tickets. This is also a problem with the next report [2]. -Ivan [1] ht

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Should we unset SAGE_ENV_SOURCED in sage-native-execute?

On Jan 23, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-01-22 17:28, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Jan 22, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> >>> sage-native-execute should remove all traces of Sage in from the >>> environment, but there is definitely stuf

Re: [sage-devel] Unifying Command line options

On Jan 27, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Keshav Kini wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 18:26, David Roe wrote: >> We're working on rewriting the doctest framework only. So we're still >> just sticking to hyphens, but are making them UNIX-compliant: --gdb >> instead of -gdb for example. My first impression o

Re: [sage-devel] sagemath.org, sagenb.org and mobile devices

On Jan 25, 2012, at 2:52 PM, kcrisman wrote: > Ivan's iPhone app is cool. However, when it links to sagenb or > sagemath.org, it looks ... unhelpful. Perhaps this is possible to fix > easily - exchange below. Is there someone for whom this would be only > epsilon/two of effort to fix, who has

Re: [sage-devel] Unifying Command line options

On Jan 29, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: >>> I think the key change should be to become Posix compliant, and >>> these are allowable short options. And they combine nicely: "sage >>> -bta" would mean rebuild everything and test everything. >> These commands are odd. For most programs you

[sage-devel] iOS app is for sale

For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is in the app store: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sage-math/id496492945?ls=1&mt=8 I would love any feedback, big or small. Be warned, interacts are supported yet. -Ivan -- To post to this group, send an email to sage

Re: [sage-devel] iOS app is for sale

On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:45 PM, David Joyner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is >> in the app store: >> >> http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sage-math/id496492945?ls=1&

Re: [sage-devel] iOS app is for sale

On Jan 30, 2012, at 11:54 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > On Jan 30, 2012, at 14:39 , Ivan Andrus wrote: > >> For those who have been waiting to run it, version 1.0 of the iPhone app is >> in the app store: >> >> http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/sage-math/id496492945

Re: [sage-devel] iOS app is for sale

On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: >> Hi, Ifti, >> On Jan 30, 2012, at 21:36 , Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin >>> wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:34 PM

Re: [sage-devel] Naming runs of Sage

On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote: > Hi folks, > > When I execute a Sage script using the 'nohup' command [1], for instance > > nohup sage test.sage > out.txt & > > the process is listed in the 'top' command display as 'python'. How do > I give user-generated names to this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sagemath.org, sagenb.org and mobile devices

On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/29/12 9:41 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Jan 25, 2012, at 2:52 PM, kcrisman wrote: >> >>> Ivan's iPhone app is cool. However, when it links to sagenb or >>> sagemath.org, it looks ... unhelpful. Perh

Re: [sage-devel] iOS app is for sale

On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > On Jan 31, 2012, at 00:16 , Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: >>>> Hi, Ifti, >>>> On Jan 30, 2

Re: [sage-devel] Re: iOS app is for sale

On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/31/12 2:16 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> I want to wait a few days to get any more bug reports and then I'll push >> another version (say, Friday) fixing this and anything else not too major. >> Of course it will take

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Naming runs of Sage

On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/31/12 2:23 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> When I execute a Sage script using the 'nohup' command [1], for in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: iOS app is for sale

On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/31/12 5:27 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Jason Grout wrote: >>> On 1/31/12 2:16 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >>>> I want to wait a few days to get any more bug reports and then >>>&

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Are the Sage binaries for OS X are crap?

FWIW you should be able to work around the problem by opening Terminal.app before starting sage. At least if it's the manifestation of the problem that I think it is. -Ivan On Feb 4, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Mike OS wrote: > Just corroborating. > > I encountered the same problem this week installin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Are the Sage binaries for OS X are crap?

g report about our OS X > binaries being complete crap. This time from a Fields Medalist! So > why don't we deal with this? > > The traceback he sent me is exactly the same as the one that started > this thread.This is really stupid. > > -- William > > On S

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Are the Sage binaries for OS X are crap?

On Feb 8, 2012, at 1:18 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 2/7/12 4:28 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> I'm fairly certain #11881 (which still needs review) will solve the problem. >> At least the most common problem. > > Do you, by chance, mean http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/t

[sage-devel] Re: Are the Sage binaries for OS X are crap?

Excellent. That's the first confirmation I've had from someone with the problem that it really was #12161. I'm cc-ing sage-devel to let them know it worked. -Ivan On Feb 10, 2012, at 1:17 AM, Michael E O'Sullivan wrote: > Brilliant! > > I restarted terminal and > MAC043:~ instructor$ /Appli

Re: [sage-devel] Xcode, GCC, and Homebrew

On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Hi, I don't run OSX often but from what I gather from posts here this should > be relevant: > > http://kennethreitz.com/xcode-gcc-and-homebrew.html > > Cheers, > Martin > That's great news! It means people will be able to get by with install

[sage-devel] New iPhone app is up

This should work on iOS 4 and you can create new items without going to the list. Unfortunately, the release notes in iTunes aren't complete. I was going to release an older version but it was rejected and I couldn't figure out how to change the release notes. It shouldn't be that hard, but a

Re: [sage-devel] Can XCode 4 be installed on OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?

On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > If yes, we should test it. > > If no, no worries. Yes. I have Xcode 4.2 installed on 10.6. I think Xcode 4.3 is only for Lion. I haven't been following the Lion discussion much. I've been building the 5.0 betas with Xcode 3, should I tr

Re: [sage-devel] Can XCode 4 be installed on OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?

On Feb 22, 2012, at 6:46 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:42, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >>> If yes, we should test it. >>> >>> If no, no worries. >> >> Yes. I have X

Re: [sage-devel] Can XCode 4 be installed on OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?

On Feb 22, 2012, at 7:14 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:09, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Feb 22, 2012, at 6:46 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:42, Ivan Andrus wrote: >>>> On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Jeroen Demeyer

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Group collaboration on a branch of Sage

On Mar 1, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: > kcrisman writes: >> On Mar 1, 9:20 am, Keshav Kini wrote: >>> The main thing I want for Sage's development process is a push/pull >>> architecture of some kind. I don't mind if that ends up meaning that we >>> finally start using Mercurial in the w

Re: [sage-devel] OS X sage app

ding. Like an EULA. Of course people would probably ignore it just like an EULA. :-) -Ivan Andrus -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Re: [sage-devel] OS X sage app

On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:46 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Mar 20, 2012, at 8:56 PM, William Stein wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The default app download of Sage on OS X is still broken.The >>> probl

Re: [sage-devel] OS X sage app

On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:59 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:46 PM, William Stein wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 8:56 PM, William Stein wro

Re: [sage-devel] Trac reports

On Mar 21, 2012, at 4:29 AM, David Roe wrote: > Hi everyone, > I've reorganized our trac reports, added a bunch of new ones and changed the > View Tickets button so that it points to > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/TicketReports. If you have any ideas > for new reports you can eithe

  1   2   3   >