On 12 April 2014 00:06, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> Note that this is implemented in various places, e.g.
> https://github.com/sagemath/sagelib/blob/master/sage/ext/multi_modular.pyx
> , but certainly a general user-friendly function would be nice to
> have.
Agreed. In my post I was mainly trying t
So what to do if the external 'tarball' is itself an SPKG that has
everything we need? I'm confused see
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16008#comment:7
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei
On 12 April 2014 09:38, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> So what to do if the external 'tarball' is itself an SPKG that has
> everything we need? I'm confused see
>
So it will take very little work to convert to the new system. The
src/ subdirectory becomes the "upstream tarball" while the SPKG.txt
and spk
Hi!
For some project, I need a recent version of sqlalchemy. Version 0.5.8
shipped with Sage is too old. On one of my laptops, with Sage version
6.1.1, I succeeded in installing sqlalchemy version 0.9.3. What I did
was "download sqlalchemy tarball, open it, and do python setup.py
install in a sage
Simon King wrote:
For some project, I need a recent version of sqlalchemy. Version 0.5.8
shipped with Sage is too old. On one of my laptops, with Sage version
6.1.1, I succeeded in installing sqlalchemy version 0.9.3. What I did
was "download sqlalchemy tarball, open it, and do python setup.py
in
Hi Leif,
On 2014-04-12, leif wrote:
> The spkg-install file is trivial; it just deletes the old version
> installed and then calls 'python setup.py install'.
>
> Afterwards run './sage -i sqlalchemy-0.9.4' or probably just './sage -f
> sqlalchemy'.
How can I get the checksum.ini file right?
B
On 2014-04-12, Simon King wrote:
> How can I get the checksum.ini file right?
Found it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@go
Simon King wrote:
How can I get the checksum.ini file right?
./sage --sh -c sage-fix-pkg-checksums
(May take a while; so you may take a look at
$SAGE_ROOT/src/bin/sage-fix-pkg-checksums and just do what's done there
for sqlalchemy-0.9.4 ... ;-) )
-leif
--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\
Hi Leif,
On 2014-04-12, leif wrote:
> Simon King wrote:
>> How can I get the checksum.ini file right?
>
> ./sage --sh -c sage-fix-pkg-checksums
Didn't know about that. Instead, I used sha1sum, md5sum and cksum
manually.
The package seemingly DID install---there was no error reported.
However,
Hi Leif,
quite interesting: In SAGE_LOCAL/lib/python/site-packages, one finds
some "SQLAlchemy" stuff, but not "sqlalchemy", in spite of renaming.
This includes stuff in version 0.9.4. So, apparently installation of the
new version has worked.
However, even though the spkg-install script does
r
On 2014-04-12, Simon King wrote:
> So, why is "rm -rf" not removing the files?
When I remove the old stuff by explicitly providing its name, rather
than using a wildcard "*" does solve my problem.
So, is rm -rf "$SAGE_LOCAL/lib/python/site-packages/SQLAlchemy*"
the wrong thing to do, i.e., a bug
Got it!
On 2014-04-12, Simon King wrote:
> So, is rm -rf "$SAGE_LOCAL/lib/python/site-packages/SQLAlchemy*"
> the wrong thing to do, i.e., a bug?
Yes, it is a bug. When I do
rm -rf "$SAGE_LOCAL"/lib/python/site-packages/SQLAlchemy*
instead (note that '"' is moved) then it works.
I don't know
On 2014-04-12 18:08, Simon King wrote:
So, is rm -rf "$SAGE_LOCAL/lib/python/site-packages/SQLAlchemy*"
the wrong thing to do, i.e., a bug?
Yes, it is wrong, the * in the quotes will not be expanded.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" grou
Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-04-12 18:08, Simon King wrote:
So, is rm -rf "$SAGE_LOCAL/lib/python/site-packages/SQLAlchemy*"
the wrong thing to do, i.e., a bug?
Yes, it is wrong, the * in the quotes will not be expanded.
And that's in Sage's original spkg-install, so we should at least fix t
leif wrote:
Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-04-12 18:08, Simon King wrote:
So, is rm -rf "$SAGE_LOCAL/lib/python/site-packages/SQLAlchemy*"
the wrong thing to do, i.e., a bug?
Yes, it is wrong, the * in the quotes will not be expanded.
And that's in Sage's original spkg-install, so we should a
15 matches
Mail list logo
