On 2012-03-20 01:30, Keshav Kini wrote:
> William Stein writes:
>> For what it is worth, I've made a git spkg:
>>
>>http://wstein.org/patches/git-1.7.2.5.spkg
>
> Here's another one, with a newer version of git and an SPKG.txt :
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/keshav/files/git-
On 2012-03-18 17:35, David Roe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> We're looking at upgrading trac from 0.11.5 to 0.12.3 (latest stable
> version). There will probably be some downtime later today (hopefully
> less than 10 minutes) to switch over to the new version.
>
> Let us know if today is a bad day for
What link is broken? I'm finding the link to
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/8109/trac_8109-lzz_pEX-copyrights.patchfrom
the attachment page for example...
David
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 01:00, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-03-18 17:35, David Roe wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
Yep, that listing lets you convert manually in either direction. But
there's no way I can see to run ticket queries testing whether the
currently logged in user is the author/reviewer of a given ticket.
David
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 23:12, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 1
Is there any progress on getting the patchbot links working again? Now that
we have a ticket to make the patchbot code generally available, there are
more copies of the patchbot running (I have one going), so the feedback is
more useful than ever before and it's a shame that it's hidden from sig
On 2012-03-20 09:17, David Roe wrote:
> What link is broken? I'm finding the link to
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/8109/trac_8109-lzz_pEX-copyrights.patch
> from the attachment page for example...
I'm not talking about the attachment page, but the Attachments section
(
On 2012-03-20 09:43, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-03-20 09:17, David Roe wrote:
>> What link is broken? I'm finding the link to
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/8109/trac_8109-lzz_pEX-copyrights.patch
>> from the attachment page for example...
> I'm not talking about
I see.
I believe the cause of some of these issues (including the missing
raw-attachment link and the missing patchbot link) is that Trac changed
some of the underlying templates. For the raw-attachment link I think we
need to add something to the snippet
Attachments
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:43:41 PM UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2012-03-20 09:17, David Roe wrote:
> > What link is broken? I'm finding the link to
> >
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/8109/trac_8109-lzz_pEX-copyrights.patch
> > from the attachment page for e
On 20 Mrz., 09:22, David Roe wrote:
> Yep, that listing lets you convert manually in either direction. But
> there's no way I can see to run ticket queries testing whether the
> currently logged in user is the author/reviewer of a given ticket.
Well, the list on the wiki page is just prose. [Yo
On 20 Mrz., 10:45, P Purkayastha wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:43:41 PM UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> > On 2012-03-20 09:17, David Roe wrote:
> > > What link is broken? I'm finding the link to
>
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/8109/trac_81...
> > > from the
Hi Dan,
( I have been given a bit more space on launchpad (up from
2G to 4G now) so I can work slightly easier. )
On 16 March 2012 03:48, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 at 07:13AM +0100, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> > Thanks, I will look into it. Are the steps to reproduce 1) install new
> O
On 20 Mrz., 11:59, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> ( I have been given a bit more space on launchpad (up from
> 2G to 4G now) so I can work slightly easier. )
>
> On 16 March 2012 03:48, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 at 07:13AM +0100, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> > > Thanks, I will lo
I noticed that the loading
of http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/admin/accounts/users now takes
significantly longer. It used to take less then a second but when I now go
there to create a new user it takes at least 5 seconds (if not more). The
stupid thing is that after having created a new ac
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 7:05:39 AM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:
>
> Wouldn't the possibility to read and write the Sage-related groups be
> an ideal addition to the Sage notebook?
>
Nice experiment, but instead of making the sage notebook an email client, I
would rather suggest you to use a tra
Jeroen Demeyer writes:
> You should post it on a ticket such that it can be added to
> optional/experimental packages.
Done:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12705
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegro
Simon King writes:
> If there even is an Emacs mode to work with Gmane, then I wonder:
> Wouldn't the possibility to read and write the Sage-related groups be
> an ideal addition to the Sage notebook? The html editor in the Sage
> notebook certainly works better than what I have experienced with t
On 20 Mrz., 13:21, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Jeroen Demeyer writes:
> > You should post it on a ticket such that it can be added to
> > optional/experimental packages.
>
> Done:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12705
Ooops, I just opened http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12707
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 1:53:36 PM UTC+1, leif wrote:
>
> I apparently was too slow …
>
and i'm completely confused, because i thought those tickets were the same.
lol.
at least i can tell you that it worked on my machine ^^
h
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googleg
Harald Schilly writes:
> On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 1:53:36 PM UTC+1, leif wrote:
>
> I apparently was too slow …
>
>
> and i'm completely confused, because i thought those tickets were the same.
> lol.
> at least i can tell you that it worked on my machine ^^
Well, the SPKGs are the same - t
Sage requires SSL, otherwise Python's hashlib module won't work.
I think this is a non-trivial dependency of Sage. Is it known that this
is a dependency? Should it be documented in the install guide?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from thi
On 20 March 2012 00:32, David Roe wrote:
> I know that we prefer real names for the purpose of release notes. Are
> there other reasons to use real names rather than trac usernames?
There may be some people, who for one reason or another, would rather
not have their real names publically viewabl
I am trying to use the Gram Schmidt orthogonalization process on a
matrix over a number field. The following code works on Sage 4.7, but
not on 4.8. There doesn't appear to be any tickets registered about
this, so I thought I would try it here. Sorry if this is the wrong
place ! - Emil.
sage:
To reply to my own message, it seems the old version of gram_schmidt
is still knocking around in sage.modules.misc, so that is a
work-around. Emil
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googl
On 20 Mrz., 15:12, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Sage requires SSL, otherwise Python's hashlib module won't work.
>
> I think this is a non-trivial dependency of Sage. Is it known that this
> is a dependency? Should it be documented in the install guide?
If it's not, surely.
It frequently pops up on
On 20 Mrz., 15:40, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 20 March 2012 00:32, David Roe wrote:
>
> > I know that we prefer real names for the purpose of release notes. Are
> > there other reasons to use real names rather than trac usernames?
>
> There may be some people, who for one reason or another, would
On 2012-03-20 15:12, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Sage requires SSL, otherwise Python's hashlib module won't work.
>
> I think this is a non-trivial dependency of Sage. Is it known that this
> is a dependency? Should it be documented in the install guide?
I'm slightly confused because we had some di
On 20 Mrz., 17:27, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-03-20 15:12, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> > Sage requires SSL, otherwise Python's hashlib module won't work.
>
> > I think this is a non-trivial dependency of Sage. Is it known that this
> > is a dependency? Should it be documented in the install g
On 3/20/12 12:39 PM, leif wrote:
On 20 Mrz., 17:27, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-03-20 15:12, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Sage requires SSL, otherwise Python's hashlib module won't work.
I think this is a non-trivial dependency of Sage. Is it known that this
is a dependency? Should it be docu
Okay, maybe Python's hashlib builds if you don't have OpenSSL on your
system. However, it *fails* if you do have an OpenSSL library but it
can't be linked.
I consider this to be a bug in Python. Put some random file at
/usr/lib/libssl.so and Python thinks you have OpenSSL installed. This
will c
On 20 March 2012 16:39, leif wrote:
>
> I thought HTTPS (which requires SSL of course) wasn't strictly needed
> in Sage, but since it is omnipresent (many Python packages use it), it
> doesn't make sense to not have it. I.e., people frequently happen to
> notice they don't have _ssl *after* they
On 18 Mrz., 17:12, Juanjo
wrote:
> On Friday, March 16, 2012 1:04:35 AM UTC+1, leif wrote:
>
> > Btw, you run into similar problems if you happen to have HOME set but
>
> the directory doesn't exist (e.g. because /home isn't mounted); ECL
>
> > insists on being at least able to *read* your home di
John Cremona writes:
> Indeed: every time I build my working copy of Sage (not counting test
> version here) I have to do first sage -i openssl and then sage -f
> python to rebuild python. Otherwise some mercurial stuff does not
> work (complains of not having _ssl, I think). The sort of thing
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:05:41 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
> … openssl …
the basic problem is this clause in their license:
"""
All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
*software must display the following acknowledgment:
"This product includes software developed
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> John Cremona writes:
>> Indeed: every time I build my working copy of Sage (not counting test
>> version here) I have to do first sage -i openssl and then sage -f
>> python to rebuild python. Otherwise some mercurial stuff does not
>> work (
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:05:41 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>> … openssl …
>
> the basic problem is this clause in their license:
> """
>
> All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> *software must display t
Keshav Kini writes:
> Would this be a problem for you once we switch to git? What do you use
> Sage's Mercurial for which requires pushing and pulling to/from a remote
> repository?
Sorry - I mean, *over HTTP(S)*.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this grou
On 20 March 2012 17:17, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>> John Cremona writes:
>>> Indeed: every time I build my working copy of Sage (not counting test
>>> version here) I have to do first sage -i openssl and then sage -f
>>> python to rebuild python
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:19:18 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> ? Can you provide a reference?
>
ah, you are right, sorry. i guess i have mixed this up with some other
custom license.
h
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, s
William Stein writes:
> He uses
>
>http://code.google.com/p/lmfdb/issues/list
>
> and
>
>http://code.google.com/p/purplesage/
>
> which both *require* https for pushing (though not for pulling if you
> url hack).
I guess Purple Sage will have to switch to git when Sage does, since
their c
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:28:52 PM UTC+1, Keshav Kini wrote:
>
> ... or will they need to start using
> systemwide versions of Mercurial?
>
systemwide hg is just fine, most of us use it this way anyways. it's just
not available on some machines sometimes …
h
--
To post to this group, send
On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:43:41 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Those links used to have a "raw-attachment" link, but not anymore.
>
I vaguely remember that mike hansen added them "manually" a long time ago.
H
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To un
On 20 Mrz., 18:05, John Cremona wrote:
> On 20 March 2012 16:39, leif wrote:
> > I thought HTTPS (which requires SSL of course) wasn't strictly needed
> > in Sage, but since it is omnipresent (many Python packages use it), it
> > doesn't make sense to not have it. I.e., people frequently happen
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> I guess Purple Sage will have to switch to git when Sage does, since
> their code bases are deeply connected. lmfdb, which I hadn't heard of
> before, looks to be a separate codebase (like sagenb is). Is it
> switching to git too? If not, then
On 20 Mrz., 18:14, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:05:41 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
> > … openssl …
>
> the basic problem is this clause in their license:
> """
>
> All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> * software must display the following ackn
Jonathan Bober writes:
> Actually, the code base of psage is not "deeply connected" to sage. It
> really is just a python library that more or less depends on "all" of
> sage being present. (Or at least a lot of sage.) It could probably
> switch to git without much of an issue. As for the LMFDB, I
On 20 Mrz., 18:20, John Cremona wrote:
> I don't mind the openssl not beeing included by default for license
> reasons. But it would be good if I could (say by setting an
> environment variable or in .sagerc file or similar) record my choice
> to include openssl *once and for all*, so that whenev
On 20 Mrz., 18:35, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:28:52 PM UTC+1, Keshav Kini wrote:
>
> > ... or will they need to start using
> > systemwide versions of Mercurial?
>
> systemwide hg is just fine, most of us use it this way anyways. it's just
> not available on some machin
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Jonathan Bober writes:
>> Actually, the code base of psage is not "deeply connected" to sage. It
>> really is just a python library that more or less depends on "all" of
>> sage being present. (Or at least a lot of sage.) It could probably
>>
William Stein writes:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Why don't such people just use Prefix already then? If Prefix solves
> this problem why do we have to deal with it? This might be a
> rhetorical question
I assume you mean, use Prefix independently of Sage, since
Then do you know how I can create a report that lists the tickets for which
the currently logged in user is an author?
David
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:20, leif wrote:
> On 20 Mrz., 15:40, David Kirkby wrote:
> > On 20 March 2012 00:32, David Roe wrote:
> >
> > > I know that we prefer real nam
On 20 Mrz., 19:10, leif wrote:
> Well, you could call a trivial shell script (few lines) each time
> before you build a Sage version from scratch, which just brings the
> openssl package into place and hacks the deps file to make the Python
> spkg depend on it.
>
> I'm not sure whether you could r
Hi,
The default app download of Sage on OS X is still broken.The
problem -- which has been pointed out before -- is that the GUI app
sets the PATH incorrectly, and starting up sage totally fails (e.g.,
to create the $HOME/.sage directory). One can work around this
problem by:
1. completel
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Simon King writes:
>> If there even is an Emacs mode to work with Gmane, then I wonder:
>> Wouldn't the possibility to read and write the Sage-related groups be
>> an ideal addition to the Sage notebook? The html editor in the Sage
>> notebook
On 3/20/12 2:30 PM, David Roe wrote:
Then do you know how I can create a report that lists the tickets for
which the currently logged in user is an author?
David
You mean like the block of reports under "My Tickets" at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/TicketReports?
Jason
--
To post
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
The default app download of Sage on OS X is still broken.The
problem -- which has been pointed out before -- is that the GUI app
sets the PATH incorrectly, and starting up sage totally fails (e.g.,
to create the $HOME/.sage directory). One can work around this
probl
I have been using the new groups interface for a while now and I prefer the
new layout.
The editor works fine for me. Its some useless rich html stuff, but at
least it doesn't get into your way as long as you write text.
On Monday, March 19, 2012 5:14:17 AM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi.
On Mar 20, 2012, at 8:56 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The default app download of Sage on OS X is still broken.The
> problem -- which has been pointed out before -- is that the GUI app
> sets the PATH incorrectly, and starting up sage totally fails (e.g.,
> to create the $HOME/.sage dire
On 20 Mrz., 21:25, Volker Braun wrote:
> I prefer the
> new layout.
>
> The editor works fine for me.
He certainly got paid!
-leif
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2012, at 8:56 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The default app download of Sage on OS X is still broken. The
>> problem -- which has been pointed out before -- is that the GUI app
>> sets the PATH incorrectly, and starting up
There are
1. a lot of doctests requiring gcc (due to runtime use of Cython)
2. a lot of doctests marked "optional -- gcc", mainly in misc/cython.py
What's up with this? This should be made uniform. I personally prefer
2. (mark as optional) such that Sage binary distributions have more
chance o
Jason Grout writes:
> On 3/20/12 2:30 PM, David Roe wrote:
>> Then do you know how I can create a report that lists the tickets for
>> which the currently logged in user is an author?
>> David
>
> You mean like the block of reports under "My Tickets" at
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/Ti
On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:46 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 8:56 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The default app download of Sage on OS X is still broken.The
>>> problem -- which has been pointed out before -- is that
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> There are
>
> 1. a lot of doctests requiring gcc (due to runtime use of Cython)
>
> 2. a lot of doctests marked "optional -- gcc", mainly in misc/cython.py
>
> What's up with this? This should be made uniform. I personally prefer
> 2. (mar
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:46 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 8:56 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
The default app download of Sage on OS X is still broken. The
Jason:
As you know, I have done a lot of thinking about interactive math
editors, and when I estimate how long it would take me to write what I
consider a descent editor, it is on the order of a month and a half to
two months of full-time work. You would need someone with experience
in o
On 2012-03-20 21:57, William Stein wrote:
> In a perfect world I wish that GCC was included in Sage (on OS X)
#12369 needs review...
Anyway, you don't just need a compiler, you also need an assembler and a
linker. So shipping GCC still won't make Cython work.
--
To post to this group, send an e
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:58 AM, leif wrote:
> On 20 Mrz., 10:45, P Purkayastha wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:43:41 PM UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> > On 2012-03-20 09:17, David Roe wrote:
>> > > What link is broken? I'm finding the link to
>>
>> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac
On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:59 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:46 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Mar 20, 2012, at 8:56 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The de
So, I have studied sage-notebook interface.
Should I attach a sketch of the new UI to my project proposal or
something like that?
On 17 мар, 13:02, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:00:02 AM UTC+1, Igor Deryabin wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> > I'm third-year student of Immanuel Kant
2012/3/20 Igor Deryabin :
> Should I attach a sketch of the new UI to my project proposal or
> something like that?
I don't know if attachments are possible, but feel free to link to an
image hosted online somewhere.
Also, let's discuss gsoc specific organizational matters at sage-gsoc
and not her
Le mardi 20 mars 2012 12:33:27 UTC+1, Maarten Derickx a écrit :
>
> I noticed that the loading of
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/admin/accounts/users now takes
> significantly longer. It used to take less then a second but when I now go
> there to create a new user it takes at least 5 se
I removed the f2c package from Sage and successfully built and tested it
on sage.math and bsd.math. So why do we need this package?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:16:05 Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I removed the f2c package from Sage and successfully built and tested it
> on sage.math and bsd.math. So why do we need this package?
We don't. I have talking several time on the mailing list that we should think
about removing it.
It was usefu
David Roe writes:
> The patchbot link needs to be inserted into another file in this folder, but
> I'm not sure what yet. I don't have permission to edit these files, and I
> need
> to sleep. If someone else can figure out what changes need to be made that
> would be great.
> David
Jon Bober h
I agree that it's a problem, but I don't know what caused the change.
David
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 16:15, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
>
>
> Le mardi 20 mars 2012 12:33:27 UTC+1, Maarten Derickx a écrit :
>
>> I noticed that the loading of http://trac.sagemath.org/**
>> sage_trac/admin/accounts/users<
Yeah. I've figured out how to write these queries, so I'm now fine with
keeping the current policy on using real names in the Authors and Reviewers
field.
David
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 13:54, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Jason Grout writes:
> > On 3/20/12 2:30 PM, David Roe wrote:
> >> Then do you kno
Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 00:22:10 UTC+1, David Roe a écrit :
>
> I agree that it's a problem, but I don't know what caused the change.
> David
>
>
I don't know either, but the sage logs tell me what your ip adress is :P, I
was looking trough the logs to see what happend if I requested the page
David Roe writes:
> Yeah. I've figured out how to write these queries, so I'm now fine with
> keeping the current policy on using real names in the Authors and Reviewers
> field.
Well, I think you mean with the caveat that people should make sure that
the "real name" they use in the Author and R
Yep. Everyone should set their "Real Name" in trac's preferences if they
want the personalized reports to work for them.
David
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 17:12, Keshav Kini wrote:
> David Roe writes:
> > Yeah. I've figured out how to write these queries, so I'm now fine with
> > keeping the curr
Whatever is going on, it has to do with trac, and not the database, it
seems. apache runs at 100% for a while before returning a response
whenever that page is loaded. I wonder if perhaps the issue is with
one of the plugins.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
>
>
> Le mercre
David Roe writes:
> Yep. Everyone should set their "Real Name" in trac's preferences if they want
> the personalized reports to work for them.
> David
So Dima can set his name to Dima Pasechnik, find all tickets with that
in the Author field, change them to Dmitrii Pasechnik, and then set his
na
plot(sqrt(2*x^2-3)/(5*x-2), (x,-10,10),ymin=-5,ymax=5)
merrily plots points when the numerator is imaginary:
http://aleph.sagemath.org/?z=eJwryMkv0SguLCrRMNKqiDPSNdbU1zDVqtA10tRR0KjQ0TU00DE00NSpzM3Ms9U1BdKJFbammgCoDQ7n
I don't mind that it complains about failing to evaluate the function,
but th
Hi everyone,
I've reorganized our trac reports, added a bunch of new ones and changed
the View Tickets button so that it points to
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/TicketReports. If you have any
ideas for new reports you can either add them (if you can express them as a
trac query) or reply
It is simply joining the points. The plot is actually correct. Attached is
the output of
plot(sqrt(2*x^2-3)/(5*x-2), (x,-10,10),ymin=-5,ymax=5,marker='*')
which shows that there are no points in the imaginary range.
On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:13:37 AM UTC+8, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> plot(sqr
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> plot(sqrt(2*x^2-3)/(5*x-2), (x,-10,10),ymin=-5,ymax=5)
>
> merrily plots points when the numerator is imaginary:
>
>
> http://aleph.sagemath.org/?z=eJwryMkv0SguLCrRMNKqiDPSNdbU1zDVqtA10tRR0KjQ0TU00DE00NSpzM3Ms9U1BdKJFbammgCoDQ7n
>
> I don't min
On 3/20/12 8:52 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
David Roe writes:
Yep. Everyone should set their "Real Name" in trac's preferences if they want
the personalized reports to work for them.\
And I can set my name to Keshav Kini and get his tickets?
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an emai
On 2012-03-20, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I removed the f2c package from Sage and successfully built and tested it
> on sage.math and bsd.math. So why do we need this package?
we don't. I don't think anyone uses f2c any more, anyway.
Should we remove it, officially?
>
--
To post to this group,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 at 08:33PM -0700, P Purkayastha wrote:
> It is simply joining the points. The plot is actually correct. Attached is
> the output of
>
> plot(sqrt(2*x^2-3)/(5*x-2), (x,-10,10),ymin=-5,ymax=5,marker='*')
>
> which shows that there are no points in the imaginary range.
Ah, tha
Jason Grout writes:
> On 3/20/12 8:52 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>> David Roe writes:
>>> Yep. Everyone should set their "Real Name" in trac's preferences if they
>>> want
>>> the personalized reports to work for them.\
>
> And I can set my name to Keshav Kini and get his tickets?
Yup.
-Keshav
-
On Mar 21, 12:47 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 at 08:33PM -0700, P Purkayastha wrote:
> > It is simply joining the points. The plot is actually correct. Attached is
> > the output of
>
> > plot(sqrt(2*x^2-3)/(5*x-2), (x,-10,10),ymin=-5,ymax=5,marker='*')
Here's a simpler example of
I have no idea if this is a new issue, but the attachments for
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12684 don't view quite correctly:
there are some lines at the end of the patch which move files around, and
those are not visible when you view the attachment.
(This may be just the same as
Does anyone use the files in the directory SAGE_ROOT/ipython? Would you
object if they were moved elsewhere in the Sage distribution, and if some
of the files were modified or deleted? (In particular, ipythonrc-scipy
might not be long for this world, if I have anything to do with it.) Newer
ver
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:07:33 John H Palmieri wrote:
> Does anyone use the files in the directory SAGE_ROOT/ipython? Would you
> object if they were moved elsewhere in the Sage distribution, and if some
> of the files were modified or deleted? (In particular, ipythonrc-scipy
> might not be long for
John H Palmieri writes:
> Does anyone use the files in the directory SAGE_ROOT/ipython? Would you object
> if they were moved elsewhere in the Sage distribution, and if some of the
> files
> were modified or deleted?
I was wondering the same thing yesterday. I would certainly not object
if they
95 matches
Mail list logo
