On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>> Hi, Ifti,
>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 21:36 , Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:34 PM
On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> When I execute a Sage script using the 'nohup' command [1], for instance
>
> nohup sage test.sage > out.txt &
>
> the process is listed in the 'top' command display as 'python'. How do
> I give user-generated names to this
On Jan 31, 2012, at 00:16 , Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>> Hi, Ifti,
>>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 21:36 , Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Thanks, Justin.
>>
>> Looks like I have t
Le 31/01/2012 08:37, Iftikhar Burhanuddin a écrit :
When I execute a Sage script using the 'nohup' command [1], for instance
nohup sage test.sage> out.txt&
I generally use gnu screen [1] when I want to let some process run. That
still makes it possible to go Ctrl+C on the process if I'm unha
On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 1/29/12 9:41 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Jan 25, 2012, at 2:52 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>> Ivan's iPhone app is cool. However, when it links to sagenb or
>>> sagemath.org, it looks ... unhelpful. Perhaps this is possible to fix
>>> easily - ex
On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 00:16 , Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
Hi, Ifti,
On Jan 30, 2012, at 21:36 , Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
On 30/01/12 22:06, François Bissey wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:20:50 Guilherme Brondani Torri wrote:
Hello!
I jut tried to compile Sage 4.8 and 5.0.beta1 on a OS X 10.6.8 (Snow
Leopard) without success.
I just did:
export MAKE="make -j8"
make
Even after R fails the compilation goes a bit fu
On 1/31/12 2:16 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
I want to wait a few days to get any more bug reports and then I'll push
another version (say, Friday) fixing this and anything else not too major. Of
course it will take a few days to get through the review process, but I'm
hoping it's faster the second
On 1/31/12 2:23 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
Hi folks,
When I execute a Sage script using the 'nohup' command [1], for instance
nohup sage test.sage> out.txt&
the process is listed in the 'top' command display as 'python'. How do
I give user
"Instantly" makes sense. [Maybe everyone knows this.] If a process creates
a file, and that file is deleted (either by the original process or by some
other process), that file still exists and can be written to by that
process until it is closed, and it takes up space on the file system. (I'm
not
On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 1/31/12 2:16 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> I want to wait a few days to get any more bug reports and then I'll push
>> another version (say, Friday) fixing this and anything else not too major.
>> Of course it will take a few days to get through
On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 1/31/12 2:23 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> When I execute a Sage script using the 'nohup' command [1], for instance
>>>
>>> nohup sage test.sage> out.txt&
>>>
>>> t
> Looks like I have to get the Bigger Cats to tame the Sage. :)
>
> Regards,
> Ifti
>
Luckily, we have a binary for you - or should, at least. I'm not sure
if Georg has made a 10.4 Intel binary lately...
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
> > Also: is it easy to make an ipad version? I don't know how easy it is to
> > scale up from an ipod version.
>
> I don't know. I haven't really looked into that yet. I think mostly it's a
> matter of creating the interface. The "problem" is that the interface is so
> spartan right now I'
On 1/31/12 5:27 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 1/31/12 2:16 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
I want to wait a few days to get any more bug reports and then
I'll push another version (say, Friday) fixing this and anything
else not too major. Of course it will t
On 1/30/12 5:11 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 1/29/12 1:49 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
Well, I wonder if we shouldn't ask around a bit more. If a day later you
found something better than pre3d, maybe soon you will find something
even better than three.js? :P As to who would be a good community to ask
ab
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 00:16 , Ivan Andrus wrote:
>>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> Hi, Ifti,
>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 1/30/12 5:11 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>> On 1/29/12 1:49 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, I wonder if we shouldn't ask around a bit more. If a day later you
>>> found something better than pre3d, maybe soon you will find something
>>> e
On 1/31/12 8:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
On 1/30/12 5:11 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 1/29/12 1:49 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
Well, I wonder if we shouldn't ask around a bit more. If a day later you
found something better than pre3d, maybe soon
meta:I figure this belongs on sage-marketing, so reply there, but
putting on sage-devel.
Mathematica now has a Q&A site on Stack Exchange (the thing our askbot
is modeled on, I think).
http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/37304/mathematica
It's in public beta, only a few weeks old.
What I
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:27 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> meta:I figure this belongs on sage-marketing, so reply there, but
> putting on sage-devel.
>
> Mathematica now has a Q&A site on Stack Exchange (the thing our askbot
> is modeled on, I think).
>
> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/37304/ma
On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 1/31/12 5:27 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> On 1/31/12 2:16 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
I want to wait a few days to get any more bug reports and then
I'll push another version (say, Friday) fi
Hi all,
this is now #12370, patch ready for review at [1].
When making the proposed change I spotted an inconsistency in
the error messages when calling A.determinant() for A a non-square
matrix. If A is defined over QQ the error message says
ValueError: incompatible matrix dimensions
whereas o
>
> On a related topic what other cool (but short) examples should be included?
> For example, I would like something from number theory (about which I know
> nothing), and maybe an ODE or something. A few to show off the breadth of
> Sage.
>
factor(2012)
William
--
To post to this group,
That looks much better than the previous webgl stuff!
Jonathan
On Jan 31, 8:57 am, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> No problem. Here is the demo that I'm basing my work on:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jason/threejsboilerplate/
>
> You can get a screenshot by doing 'p' and can go fullscreen
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:27:48 AM UTC-8, kcrisman wrote:
>
> 2.5 answers per question is good, only 1 answer per question needs
> some work. In a healthy site, questions receive multiple answers and
> the best answer is voted to the top.
I would have thought this is uncontroversial. If yo
If you get the space back after a kill -9 then it must be open file
descriptors, as Jonathan said. Robert or root should do a 'lsof' after
running the buildbot for a while to see which file descriptors are open.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscri
Hi,
I was patching happily, when I was hit by this:
sage -t --long "devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py"
**
File "/home/jpuydt/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py", line 3061:
sage: n(binomial(0.5r, 5),prec=53)
Expe
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:43 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:26 AM, John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>
> (Beyond the issue of fortran) I'm not sure if it will be possible to
> build all of the sage libraries with clang. For instance, it currently
> doesn't yet support nested functions, which I know at least ratpoints
> uses.
>
C
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:13, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>>
>> (Beyond the issue of fortran) I'm not sure if it will be possible to
>> build all of the sage libraries with clang. For instance, it currently
>> doesn't yet support nes
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, William Stein
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jan 16,
What I'm trying to say is: Upstream needs to be informed that they
shouldn't use non-standard C extensions. Nested functions especially are a
bad design choice in a world that is moving away from executable stacks.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubs
On 01/31/12 09:20 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:13, Volker Braun wrote:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
(Beyond the issue of fortran) I'm not sure if it will be possible to
build all of the sage libraries with clang. For instance,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 15:52, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 01/31/12 09:20 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:13, Volker Braun wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
(Beyond the issue of fortran) I'm not sure if
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 14:13, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01:41 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:04, John H Palmieri
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, William wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012
36 matches
Mail list logo
