Hi.
memtest86+ reports some memory errors...
I'm going to fix that.
Thorough inspection of my SCSI hard drive (badblocks -w
+ the adaptec tool) doesn't report any problem.
I've of course tried to install first a prebuild sage binary,
but unfortunately my processor doesn't support some
sse* instr
Hi Golam,
It seems that you and Jason are getting a firm grip on this, which is
great. Just out of curiosity and my ignorance of the underlying code: Is
your aim to hard-code certain functions, or is your aim to provide the
users with the possibility of defining the latex representation of the
This is the amazing thing about Sage and an attribute of good
software: you don't need to understand every detail in order to use it
productively. And it motivates you to learn more and explore unknown
fields such as mathematics. :)
I just spoke to a Geography professor who said that it would be
On Mar 26, 5:07 am, mabshoff wrote:
> Well, I will not merge a second implementation as long as there is no
> clear roadmap for resolving the problem.
The basic functionality of Mike's powerseries class is also contained
in my class.
That is add, multiply, power, composition, shift, differentiat
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:17:19 -0700
Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:13 PM, William Stein
> wrote:
> > 3. I would also like to see the default symbolics switch from
> > maxima-based to pynac, which would I think really clearly justify
> > the switch to 4.0, since it will have a
I don't mean to be pessimistic, but perhaps its more realistic to
imagine sage days 15 as a time to try to wrap up the symbolics
switch. My impression is that there aren't that many people who feel
qualified and have the time to work on the switch, and that seems hard
to change except at a sage d
On Mar 23, 2009, at 5:39 PM, ulfarsson wrote:
> would it be possible to make the notebook files clickable in the
> following sense:
> If I have a file test.sws at /user/Documents/mySAGEfiles that I click
> then SAGE opens a new
> session by opening up a notebook server using the files at /user/
>
On Mar 26, 1:18 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:13 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > At a minimum, Sage-4.0 will be the following:
>
> > 1. doctest coverage of the core Sage library at 75%
>
> I've been working on the doctest coverage of the crypto m
> There is a list of changes needed in pynac on the wiki. Here is the
> link (though the wiki seems to be down at the moment):
Not just the wiki:
www.sagemath.org
Service Temporarily Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to
maintenance downtime or capacity pr
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:22 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>> There is a list of changes needed in pynac on the wiki. Here is the
>> link (though the wiki seems to be down at the moment):
>
> Not just the wiki:
>
> www.sagemath.org
> Service Temporarily Unavailable
>
> The server is temporarily unable
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
>
> My impression is that there aren't that many people who feel
> qualified and have the time to work on the switch, and that seems hard
> to change except at a sage days.
I bet there are at least 3 people reading this right now, any of w
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:20 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 26, 1:18 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi William,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:13 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>>
>> > At a minimum, Sage-4.0 will be the following:
>>
>> > 1. doctest coverage of the core Sage library at
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Henryk Trappmann
wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 5:07 am, mabshoff wrote:
>> Well, I will not merge a second implementation as long as there is no
>> clear roadmap for resolving the problem.
>
> The basic functionality of Mike's powerseries class is also contained
> in my
On Mar 26, 3:52 pm, William Stein wrote:
> 2. Make sure your code has 100% doctest coverage.
I have two questions here.
1. I work intensely with functions defined inside of methods (because
one attribute of the power series is a function. It needs to be
defined whenever a method returns a power
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Henryk Trappmann
wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 3:52 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> 2. Make sure your code has 100% doctest coverage.
>
> I have two questions here.
> 1. I work intensely with functions defined inside of methods (because
> one attribute of the power series is
> wst...@sage:~/build/sage-3.4/devel/sage/sage$ sage -coverage .
> Overall weighted coverage score: 65.3%
> Total number of functions: 22425
>
> Here is the breakdown by file:
>
Great - thanks!
>
> Now that you just looked that over, what can you help on?
Oh, I think I'll find something :)
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Jason Grout
>
> I think at this point, it'd be good to post a patch so that we can all
> see the full change. Do you know how to make a patch with mercurial?
> Have you been using version control to save your changes?
Frankly, I am trying to learn mer
Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Jason Grout
>> I think at this point, it'd be good to post a patch so that we can all
>> see the full change. Do you know how to make a patch with mercurial?
>> Have you been using version control to save your change
Hi Stan,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Stan Schymanski
> It seems that you and Jason are getting a firm grip on this, which is
> great. Just out of curiosity and my ignorance of the underlying code: Is
> your aim to hard-code certain functions, or is your aim to provide the
> users with the po
Hi,
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:11:39 -0300
Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> Jason: I am attaching the patch for enhancing typesetting of
> functions. I need to add doc-tests though. In the patch, I have
> implemented all the situations that I planned to do.
>
> Apart from the situations I mentioned
http://www.google.com/Top/Science/Math/Algebra/Software/
Missing Sage?
Hazem
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more op
Another one:
http://www.dmoz.org/Science/Math/Software/
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, Hazem wrote:
> http://www.google.com/Top/Science/Math/Algebra/Software/
>
> Missing Sage?
>
> Hazem
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Hazem wrote:
>
> Another one:
>
> http://www.dmoz.org/Science/Math/Software/
That includes sage.
> On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, Hazem wrote:
>> http://www.google.com/Top/Science/Math/Algebra/Software/
>>
>> Missing Sage?
You should write to them and ask them to add sag
On 26 Mrz., 09:10, bourbabis wrote:
> Hi.
>
> memtest86+ reports some memory errors...
> I'm going to fix that.
> Thorough inspection of my SCSI hard drive (badblocks -w
> + the adaptec tool) doesn't report any problem.
>
> I've of course tried to install first a prebuild sage binary,
> but unf
On Mar 26, 3:17 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Hazem wrote:
>
> > Another one:
>
> >http://www.dmoz.org/Science/Math/Software/
>
> That includes sage.
>
> > On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, Hazem wrote:
> >>http://www.google.com/Top/Science/Math/Algebra/Software/
>
> >> Missin
Hi Burcin,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> 5. Recurse nicely with subscripts.
>
> How is your function different, apart from the fact that you don't
> process suffixes recursively?
In one sentence: the new function returns False for un-told situations
whereas the exis
I found this article on Python performance improvement interesting:
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
Google's goal appears to be a 5x performance improvement in Python.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Daryl Hammond wrote:
>
> I found this article on Python performance improvement interesting:
>
> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/03/google-launches-project-to-boost-python-performance-by-5x.ars
>
> Google's goal appears to be a 5x performance improvem
Hi,
today I had to solve some function for my chemical kinetics class, so
I tried it in sympy first and I was surprised it just worked:
In [1]: var("E R T A beta")
Out[1]: (E, R, T, A, β)
In [2]: eq = Eq(E/(R*T**2), A/beta * exp(-E/(R*T)))
In [3]: eq
Out[3]:
-E
───
> I read the article with excitement, but unfortunately that article is
> total BS -- it's reporting at its worst, and then some. The actual
> project that article is about
>
> http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan
>
> seems to be massively misrepresented by the arstechnica
Hi,
when some python command returns a unicode output (e.g. sympy's
prettyprinter), it shows nice in the notebook. However, when I save
it, go out, then load it again, I can see some mess (however, if I
evaluate all cells, it looks good again). The same happens when I
publish the sheet, so it loo
This should be fixed if you apply the patches in #4547 + #5211.
Alternatively, you can workaround it by manually choosing encoding in
the web browser as UTF-8 (View|Character encoding in firefox).
I'm running 3.4+those patches in a production server and it seems to
be working ok. I need to use sp
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> today I had to solve some function for my chemical kinetics class, so
> I tried it in sympy first and I was surprised it just worked:
Do you have a nicely documented description of the algorithm sympy
uses to implement its solve?
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 at 02:59AM -0300, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
> This should be fixed if you apply the patches in #4547 + #5211.
>
> Alternatively, you can workaround it by manually choosing encoding in
> the web browser as UTF-8 (View|Character encoding in firefox).
>
> I'm running 3.4+those patch
34 matches
Mail list logo
