On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Henryk Trappmann <bo198...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 26, 3:52 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2. Make sure your code has 100% doctest coverage. > > I have two questions here. > 1. I work intensely with functions defined inside of methods (because > one attribute of the power series is a function. It needs to be > defined whenever a method returns a power series).
Does pickling actually work on power series with such attributes that are functions? > All those inner functions are listed in "missing doctests". > To add a short documentation string was no deal, but provide doctests > for all those inner functions? Create a doctest that ends up indirectly calling the inner function, then label it sage: the doctest # indirect doctest > > 2. I got a method _test which contains a whole test suite for the > class as doctest (and nothing else). These tests maybe not appropriate > to put into other doctests. However sage -coverage declares it as: > "Possibly wrong (function name doesn't occur in doctests)". Does that > count as minus? No, that doesn't count as a minus. William > > Henryk > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
