On Mar 26, 5:07 am, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Well, I will not merge a second implementation as long as there is no > clear roadmap for resolving the problem.
The basic functionality of Mike's powerseries class is also contained in my class. That is add, multiply, power, composition, shift, differentiate and integrate. I also changed my implementation that now a recursive define is possible according to Ralf Hemmecke's suggestion in this thread. I can incorporate any additional functionality from Mike's implementation after consulting him, also about about sage style and conventions etc. Is this a roadmap of resolving the problem? Or is there a special need to start with Mike's implementation as base? Henryk --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
