2008/5/25 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> the 3.0.2 sources have been released in the usual place and the repo
> has been pushed. Please try "sage -upgrade" and report any trouble. We
> are building binaries and once those are in place we will announce
> formally on sage-support
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:43 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the 3.0.2 sources have been released in the usual place and the repo
> has been pushed. Please try "sage -upgrade" and report any trouble.
I've had two problems. Same machine, different operating systems.
Machine: Macbook,
On May 25, 7:45 pm, "Franco Saliola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:43 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the 3.0.2 sources have been released in the usual place and the repo
> > has been pushed. Please try "sage -upgrade" and report any trouble.
Hi Franco
> I've
On May 5, 8:44 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been thinking more about how to handle deprecated functionality.
> Seehttp://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/1e7d8b...
> for our initial discussion. There, the conclusions seemed to be:
>
> 1. We should have
I have a Core2-quad processor.
Ubuntu 8.04, 64-bit.
Fails to build GMP. All before this seems to work ok.
First message that looks suspect in "install.log" is:
Patching gmp-h.in (fixes OSX 10.5 issues and gcc 4.3 problems)
Do we have a Core2 CPU?... No
[: 220: ==: unexpected operator
Obviousl
On May 25, 10:20 pm, bertd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bert,
> I have a Core2-quad processor.
> Ubuntu 8.04, 64-bit.
>
> Fails to build GMP. All before this seems to work ok.
this is a POSIX non-compliance problem in spkg-install. We are
tracking it at #3301 and a fix should be up there in a
Hello Michael,
Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questions (I have to boot into
Ubuntu to answer your other questions).
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OS 2: Mac OS X 10.4.
>>
>> "sage -upgrade" from a compiled (not binary) sage-3.0.1 didn't work:
>>
>>
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Michael,
>
Hi Franco,
>
> Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questions (I have to boot into
> Ubuntu to answer your other questions).
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Michael Abshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Michael,
>
> Hi Franco,
>
>>
>> Here is a reply to your OS X 10.4 questions (I have to boot into
>> Ubuntu to answer your other
On May 25, 1:32 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 25, 10:20 pm, bertd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Bert,
>
> > I have a Core2-quad processor.
> > Ubuntu 8.04, 64-bit.
>
> > Fails to build GMP. All before this seems to work ok.
>
> this is a POSIX non-compliance problem in sp
On May 26, 1:11 am, bertd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 25, 1:32 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bert,
> > What is /bin/sh link to on your box? Usually on Ubuntu it is a link to
> > bash, so unless something has changed or you did something to that
> > link it should "just wo
Hello folks,
Sage 3.0.2 has been released on May 24th, 2008. It is available at
http://sagemath.org/download.html
* About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org)
Sage is developed by volunteers and combines 71 open source packages.
It is available for download from sagemath.org and its mirro
Since no one else has responded, I'll go ahead and say that I don't know
anything about this. Maybe this email will be a reminder to someone who
does know. (Or maybe any questions have already been taken care of off
list?)
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 17:12 -0700, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, May 23,
Jonathan wrote:
Hi,
> Since no one else has responded, I'll go ahead and say that I don't know
> anything about this. Maybe this email will be a reminder to someone who
> does know. (Or maybe any questions have already been taken care of off
> list?)
>
>
I did have a chat with rlm about the p
Jonathan wrote:
Hi,
> Since no one else has responded, I'll go ahead and say that I don't know
> anything about this. Maybe this email will be a reminder to someone who
> does know. (Or maybe any questions have already been taken care of off
> list?)
>
>
I did have a chat with rlm about the p
Hi Maxima (and Sage-Devel),
This email is about the thread
http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2008/011679.html
about combining Maxima and Octave in the
same environment so that one can do numerical and symbolic computation
without having to reinvent the wheel and implement everythi
16 matches
Mail list logo
