Since no one else has responded, I'll go ahead and say that I don't know anything about this. Maybe this email will be a reminder to someone who does know. (Or maybe any questions have already been taken care of off list?)
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 17:12 -0700, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:43 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Actually, it is not released under GPL. It's currently licensed under > >>> Apache 2.0, which is GPL compatible. It had previously been under > >>> Boyer's personal license. > >> > >> The Apache 2.0 license is not compatible with GPLv2. I believe during > >> Sage Days 7, he released it (at least to Sage) under the GPL. > >> > > > > I think apache 2.0 is not GPLv2 compatible, but Apache 2.0 *is* GPLv2+ > > compatible. > > > > I just talked about this with Michael, and we really don't want Apache code > linked into Sage, at least not for our Microsoft Windows port. > > Emily, Robert, and Jon Bober - could you guys get documentation that the > code has been relicensed GPLv2 and change the headers, or if not please > contact the author? > > -- William > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
