Hello,
I am limiting myself to less than one email per day in this thread :)
On Feb 23, 2:58 pm, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think, though I'm not sure, that mabshoff has perhaps misunderstood
> my points, probably because my post was too long, for which I
> apologize. As I said, t
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:59 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:0
Thanks but this version is lacking a copyright notice, license (GPL?),
and docstrings.
See special.py
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main/file/59538ebc8f3b/sage/functions/special.py
(or pretty much any other Python module in SAGE) for an example of
how such things could look. If it has solved Wes
This one is better, but still lacking the licence, for example. Also, did you
see if sage -t isolve.sage passes?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 2:35 AM, SBP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've just added some description so it show when typing isolve?
>
> Cheers.
>
>
sage -upgrade from 2.10.1 to 2.10.2:
I got a failure here:
package /opt/sage-2.10/spkg/standard/linbox-20070915.p6.spkg
checking for NTL >= 5.0... found
checking for GIVARO >= 3.0... found
checking for C interface to BLAS... not found
checking for others BLAS... not found
**
After hearing some ideas on IRC regarding the derivatives mess, in
this email I propose a plan. It's rough around the edges. Comments
welcome.
CURRENT SITUATION
There are currently at least 18 different functions for
differentiation in Sage, attached to polynomials, power series,
symbol
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:37 PM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After hearing some ideas on IRC regarding the derivatives mess, in
> this email I propose a plan. It's rough around the edges. Comments
> welcome.
>
>
> CURRENT SITUATION
>
> There are currently at least 18 different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David, thanks for bringing up the interaction with #2274. Mercurial
will definitely *not* like to merge the two doc patches, since I've made
some changes in the coding theory section (in the histogram example, for
instance, which we both noticed was
good day
I try to install sage under Vista Microsoft.
VmWare player work fine . i can also launch sage and notebook()
command.
but after i received this message error. see screen capture via this
link http://www.monsterup.com/image.php?url=upload/1203861726.jpg.
Is there someone with ideas abou
hello everyone
I have somme difficults to run sage under microsoft vista.
when command "notebook() is execute ,there is an error message :
please see the capture screen for indications at link :
http://www.monsterup.com/image.php?url=upload/1203861726.jpg
if someone have an idea about this prob
On Feb 24, 3:05 pm, philt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sage -upgrade from 2.10.1 to 2.10.2:
> I got a failure here:
Hi Phil.
Does this happen reproducibly? I assume you are on Linux, but which
distribution, CPU type, gcc and so on?
> package /opt/sage-2.10/spkg/standard/linbox-20070915.p6.sp
On Feb 24, 6:37 am, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After hearing some ideas on IRC regarding the derivatives mess, in
> this email I propose a plan. It's rough around the edges. Comments
> welcome.
Your proposal looks excellent.
Carl
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~--
On Feb 24, 5:20 pm, danielbrst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello everyone
Hi,
> I have somme difficults to run sage under microsoft vista.
>
> when command "notebook() is execute ,there is an error message :
> please see the capture screen for indications at link
> :http://www.monsterup.com/
On Feb 23, 11:59 pm, "alex clemesha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, thanks for doing those benchmarks,
> they are pretty interesting to see!
>
> I want to stress that I think that this API discussion
> should really *not* have anything to do with speed,
> and this is precisely because of
danielbrst wrote:
> thank you for answered
>
>
Please do not take discussions private.
> i don't find anywhere the way :/home/sage/.sage .there is any folder
> with the sage name .
>
> perhaps a probleme of installation ?
>
>
I haven't checked the VMWare image myself, but the above direc
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:20 AM, danielbrst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello everyone
>
> I have somme difficults to run sage under microsoft vista.
>
> when command "notebook() is execute ,there is an error message :
You can safely ignore that error message.
-- William
> please see th
Hi Michael,
> Does this happen reproducibly?
I tried twice "sage -upgrade" and twice the same error (looks like it
tries twice per attempt then stops)
> I assume you are on Linux, but which
> distribution, CPU type, gcc and so on?
64-bit Debian Lenny in a vserver
sage:/# uname -a
Linux sage 2.6
As the author of the one of the patches, possibly soon to be
obsolete, I like this proposal.
The one thing I don't like is the name. I prefer nouns, as in
A.derivative(). A.diff() is short for A.differentiate(), which
sounds like an in place procedure to me.
Standardizing on an abbreviat
>
> While I have
> local/lib/libcblas.so
Ok, is that $SAGE_LOCAL/local/lib ? The config test complains about a
missing cblas:
configure:24249: g++ -o conftest -g -fPIC -I"/opt/sage-2.10/local/
include" -I"/opt/sage-2.10/local/include/linbox"
-L"/opt/sage-2.10/local/lib" -g -I"/opt/sage-2.10/
On Feb 24, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Fallen Seraph wrote:
> The function I was interested in was:
>
> g(p,q) = 2*q(exp((q+p)^4)+1)+p(2*exp((q+p)^4)-1)
It's not clear to me whether the first q is supposed to be multiplied
by the following stuff, or whether q is supposed to be a *function*
being eval
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From my IRC log:
>
> Not in detail. I downloaded the patch and looked at it a
> little.
> But it is obviously huge.
> I was going to add stuff about the preparser at sd8 since
> they seemed to want to know about it.
> But since it increases coverage by 2% I am sur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fallen Seraph wrote:
| The IRC channel suggested I post my related bug report here.
|
| Basically, using the "diff" function is giving me different, and
| equally wrong, answers depending on the sytax I use.
|
| The function I was interested in was:
|
The IRC channel suggested I post my related bug report here.
Basically, using the "diff" function is giving me different, and
equally wrong, answers depending on the sytax I use.
The function I was interested in was:
g(p,q) = 2*q(exp((q+p)^4)+1)+p(2*exp((q+p)^4)-1)
To find the derivative wrt q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I like the proposed plan.
I also agree with Nick on derivative() vs diff(), but since the plan
says that both will be around, I can probably live with that.
Best,
Alex
Nick Alexander wrote:
| As the author of the one of the patches, possibly so
Hi Alex,
it looks like you are using a bunch of dictionaries for all the attributes
like title, authors, etc. Wouldn't an object Reference or so be a better
choice with appropriate attributes?
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Fallen Seraph wrote:
> | The IRC channel suggested I post my related bug report here.
> |
> | Basically, using the "diff" function is giving me different, and
> |
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear William,
>
> my usual mail server doesn't work, so i'm using a different address.
>
> I tried to implement a tensor product for matrices. I did so in matrix2.pyx,
> as you suggested. The code is almost trivial, the exam
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:13 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:59 PM, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:24 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:3
Okay
So pretty much everyone seems to like the proposal, and from
discussion on IRC and sage-devel we're going to use derivative()
instead of diff(), which is fine with me.
I'm going to start coding as soon as I discuss with martin about the
have_ring parameter issues
david
On Fe
On 24-Feb-08, at 2:39 PM, David Harvey wrote:
>
> Okay
>
> So pretty much everyone seems to like the proposal, and from
> discussion on IRC and sage-devel we're going to use derivative()
> instead of diff(), which is fine with me.
Woot!
> I'm going to start coding as soon as I discuss with
On Sunday 24 February 2008, David Harvey wrote:
> Okay
>
> So pretty much everyone seems to like the proposal, and from
> discussion on IRC and sage-devel we're going to use derivative()
> instead of diff(), which is fine with me.
>
> I'm going to start coding as soon as I discuss with martin
On Feb 24, 12:24 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem basically goes back to this. If you want the following
> to work:
>
> sage: f = sin(x)
> sage: f(2)
> sin(2)
>
> Then you *have* to also allow the following to work like this:
>
> sage: f(q,p) = q(2) + p(3)
> sage: f
>
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:46 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Carlo Hamalainen wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Arguments for including Ajanki's code:
>> >>
33 matches
Mail list logo
