[sage-devel] trac back online

Trac should be working now. Last night I went to explore things there in preparation to the GitHub move, and it turned out I knocked it down. It was easy to fix, done an hour ago. Apologies to everyone affected, and please post here if it's down again before Monday 13:00 UTC. Dima -- You receiv

[sage-devel] trac #34828 - Sage doctest framework ignores amendments by decorators

Something I stumbled upon on #34804 - vanilla Python's doctest framework plays much nicer with decorators than Sage's one. Help from anyone knowledgeable about these matters in Sage woud be much appreciated. Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sag

Re: [sage-devel] Trac no longer seems to push to sagetrac-mirror

Once an hour sounds fine On Friday, September 2, 2022 at 1:38:59 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > I've done a round of manual pushing of updates from trac git to > sagetrac-mirror > This has triggered a bunch of Actions. > > How often should we run this? Once an hour, once a day? > > Dima > > On

Re: [sage-devel] Trac no longer seems to push to sagetrac-mirror

I've done a round of manual pushing of updates from trac git to sagetrac-mirror This has triggered a bunch of Actions. How often should we run this? Once an hour, once a day? Dima On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 6:22 AM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > Hence nothing has run on GH Actions for 2 days > https://

[sage-devel] Trac no longer seems to push to sagetrac-mirror

Hence nothing has run on GH Actions for 2 days https://github.com/sagemath/sagetrac-mirror/actions Is this being worked on? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: [sage-devel] Trac SSH key change

For what it is worth, this seems to be when/why the host keys changed: root@trac:~# grep -B1 \ google-compute-engine$ /var/log/apt/history.log Start-Date: 2022-08-28 *11:13:16* Commandline: apt install google-compute-engine root@trac:~# journalctl |grep Instance\ ID Aug 28 *11:13:18* trac google_

Re: [sage-devel] trac down

there are new keys now. On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, 07:41 'Martin R' via sage-devel, < sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote: > There seems to be a problem with trac, or is it just me? The website says: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > TracError: Error updating the gitolite-admin repository:

[sage-devel] trac down

There seems to be a problem with trac, or is it just me? The website says: Traceback (most recent call last): ... TracError: Error updating the gitolite-admin repository: Host key verification failed. fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rig

Re: [sage-devel] Trac SSH key change

Thanks a lot. A. Le mardi 30 août 2022 à 12:18:41 UTC+2, j...@aims.ac.za a écrit : > Hi > > The new key fingerprints are: > > root@trac:/etc/ssh# for i in dsa ecdsa ed25519 rsa;do ssh-keygen -lf > ssh_host_${i}_key.pub;done > 1024 SHA256:OcDDAITkg6PYce8VfnQJDPU+c84Uv2oy5wghE28XZD4 root@trac (DS

Re: [sage-devel] Trac SSH key change

Hi The new key fingerprints are: root@trac:/etc/ssh# for i in dsa ecdsa ed25519 rsa;do ssh-keygen -lf ssh_host_${i}_key.pub;done 1024 SHA256:OcDDAITkg6PYce8VfnQJDPU+c84Uv2oy5wghE28XZD4 root@trac (DSA) 256 SHA256:*29lzUeszegCYCnVMOJ+Ts/**IlCwojLuf03NnVoLlONEs* root@trac (ECDSA) 256 SHA256:hWfFCmt2

Re: [sage-devel] Trac SSH key change

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022, 10:41 Antoine Leudière, wrote: > Hi, > > It seems the Trac SSH server key has changed; got this message after > attempting > `git push`: > > ``` > @@@ > @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ > @

[sage-devel] Trac SSH key change

Hi, It seems the Trac SSH server key has changed; got this message after attempting `git push`: ``` @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@ IT IS POSSIBLE T

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #34152 needs you (to vote)!

hybrid > copy files > sage pseudo package Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #34152 needs you (to vote)!

My and djoyner votes are for sage pseudopkg Dima On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, 00:38 François Bissey, wrote: > Hi all, > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34152 needs help to decide what solution > we implement going forward. > > The ticket is concerned with updating the bootstrap process by removing

[sage-devel] Trac only displaying some comments

I think this is something that has to do with more recent versions of Firefox, as I can see everything in Chrome, but I only see the changes to the ticket that have comments. So if someone, say, changes only the branch field or the milestone, I do not see these. Is there something that can be d

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #34152 needs you (to vote)!

Can I give my (proxy) vote to Dima? On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 7:38 PM François Bissey wrote: > > Hi all, > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34152 needs help to decide what solution we > implement going forward. > > The ticket is concerned with updating the bootstrap process by removing the > cu

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #34152 needs you (to vote)!

copy files > hybrid > sage pseudo package Thanks, François. Guillermo On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 01:38, François Bissey wrote: > Hi all, > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34152 needs help to decide what solution > we implement going forward. > > The ticket is concerned with updating the bootstr

[sage-devel] Trac #34152 needs you (to vote)!

Hi all, https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34152 needs help to decide what solution we implement going forward. The ticket is concerned with updating the bootstrap process by removing the current need for gettext and replacing it with gnulib ( https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib). gnulib is not a r

[sage-devel] trac messages not delivered

Hi, the mailhost for sagemath.org is down since yesterday, I'm looking into it. Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googleg

[sage-devel] Trac and ssh

Dear all, I have trouble getting access to the public key. The message said the public key permission denied. The public key was pasted to my sage preference page, and I also have public key and private key in my .ssh file. I'm wondering if anyone can help me with that. Thank you so much for a

Re: [sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 9:32:29 AM UTC+1 David Coudert wrote: > In the spam they are! First time I see this in more than 10 years! Thank >> you. >> > I think I must have done something wrong myself with my phone maybe by clicking "consider this as spam". Because the solution for me was

Re: [sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

Can you send me a couple of such messages (complete with headers etc) so that I can see what exactly goes amiss? Dima On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, 08:32 David Coudert, wrote: > > In the spam they are! First time I see this in more than 10 years! Thank >> you. >> > > I frequently have emails about sag

Re: [sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

> In the spam they are! First time I see this in more than 10 years! Thank > you. > I frequently have emails about sagemath in my spam folder and I have not find yet how to change the rules of gmail to avoid that. Best, David. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

> > > There are certainly a number of emails in the logs sent to you today > and on the 13th. > Probably Google is to blame - did you check your spam? In the spam they are! First time I see this in more than 10 years! Thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 4:48 PM Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > I don't know if it is related but the last email I received from trac dates > from Feb 3 whereas many tickets I participate in were updated since then. Am > I the only one in this situation? > There are certainly a number of emails in t

Re: [sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

I don't know if it is related but the last email I received from trac dates from Feb 3 whereas many tickets I participate in were updated since then. Am I the only one in this situation? On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 2:04:00 AM UTC+1 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 9:

Re: [sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 9:00:19 AM UTC+9 wst...@gmail.com wrote: > I get alerts from "uptimerobot" when trac goes up and down. It was > down for 27 minutes, but is up now. Trac goes down for a while about > once a week. See attached screenshot with data for 2022. Yes, it is back now.

Re: [sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

If you go here https://stats.uptimerobot.com/G66v4T2v/776818201/calendar to the last few months of 2021 you can see that overall our trac setup is reliably unreliable. William On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 3:59 PM William Stein wrote: > > I get alerts from "uptimerobot" when trac goes up and down.

Re: [sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

works for me (from UK) On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 11:08 PM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > at least from where I am, Korea. Ping reports that the server is running > though. > > Kwankyu > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe

[sage-devel] trac is not accessible now

at least from where I am, Korea. Ping reports that the server is running though. Kwankyu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@g

[sage-devel] trac server very slow to respond

Hi, This morning, git pull from git://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git is very slow. It succeeds eventually, but after ten or so minutes, while there seems to be no issue with my internet connection. Am I the only one experiencing this? Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribe

Re: [sage-devel] trac and ssh

It works now! Thanks! El lunes, 8 de noviembre de 2021 a las 18:18:08 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com escribió: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:55 AM enriqu...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> If I change the ip address of my computer, I have access to trac; coming >> back to the original address, no access >> > >

Re: [sage-devel] trac and ssh

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:55 AM enriqu...@gmail.com wrote: > If I change the ip address of my computer, I have access to trac; coming > back to the original address, no access > yes, this looks like blacklisting, but I have no idea how to manage it. I've just installed updates and rebooted trac,

Re: [sage-devel] trac and ssh

If I change the ip address of my computer, I have access to trac; coming back to the original address, no access El domingo, 7 de noviembre de 2021 a las 22:40:26 UTC+1, enriqu...@gmail.com escribió: > I do not find my previous answer, did it arrive to you? Anyway, I got > locked with my tries

Re: [sage-devel] trac and ssh

I do not find my previous answer, did it arrive to you? Anyway, I got locked with my tries from my laptop, and rebooting solved that issue (not for the first machine) El domingo, 7 de noviembre de 2021 a las 18:59:07 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com escribió: > On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 3:56 PM enriqu...@

Re: [sage-devel] trac and ssh

On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 3:56 PM enriqu...@gmail.com wrote: > This week I had problems to connect via ssh with trac (in order to > checkout a trac branch). It is not the first time it happened, last time I > think it was a problem with the type of the ssh key and I managed to solve > it. > I tried

[sage-devel] trac and ssh

This week I had problems to connect via ssh with trac (in order to checkout a trac branch). It is not the first time it happened, last time I think it was a problem with the type of the ssh key and I managed to solve it. I tried in the same way and probably I made too many tries and now I have n

Re: [sage-devel] Trac emails

I had already checked, but after a closer look it might have something to do. I had disabled automatic notifications for the tickets I have commented on, assuming that setting it would simply stop automatically adding me to the notification list of those tickets. But apparently what it does is

Re: [sage-devel] Trac emails

You've probably already checked, but since at the moment there doesn't seem to be a good lead for resolving this problem: Was an email *supposed* to be sent according to the trac preferences of the account? In https://trac.sagemath.org/prefs/notification there are quite a few options to select/

Re: [sage-devel] Trac emails

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 2:11 PM Antonio Rojas wrote: > Yes, that matches the emails I have received. So the missing emails were > never sent (eg. every comment in #32656 -in which I'm CC'd- after my > comment #9) > I looked in the logs, and I am sure I e.g. can trace the moment the emails on htt

Re: [sage-devel] Trac emails

On Sun, 10 Oct 2021, 13:10 Michael Orlitzky, wrote: > On 2021-10-10 04:41:19, Antonio Rojas wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm having an issue for a long time where many of the email > > notifications I should be receiving from trac are getting lost (many > > being over 50%) Is anybody else experienc

Re: [sage-devel] Trac emails

On 2021-10-10 04:41:19, Antonio Rojas wrote: > Hi all, > I'm having an issue for a long time where many of the email > notifications I should be receiving from trac are getting lost (many > being over 50%) Is anybody else experiencing this? I think these are all relayed through sagemath.openbs

Re: [sage-devel] Trac emails

Hi, I run the mail server sending trac emails. I don't think I saw your emails ever stuck in the queue. Anyhow, please email me the addresses to look for in the logs, so that I can tell you more. Cheers, Dima On Sun, 10 Oct 2021, 12:41 Antonio Rojas, wrote: > Hi all, > I'm having an issue for a

[sage-devel] Trac emails

Hi all, I'm having an issue for a long time where many of the email notifications I should be receiving from trac are getting lost (many being over 50%). I thougt it might be a problem with my mail provider, but the same thing happens after changing to a different address. Is anybody else exper

Re: [sage-devel] trac notification emails

I discovered today that mails can also be put into quarantine. Problem solved (I hope). Best, Le mercredi 10 mars 2021 à 09:31:59 UTC+1, David Coudert a écrit : > I will ask the IT service of Inria. > Thank you Dima. > > Le mercredi 10 mars 2021 à 01:15:15 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : > >>

Re: [sage-devel] trac notification emails

I will ask the IT service of Inria. Thank you Dima. Le mercredi 10 mars 2021 à 01:15:15 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : > > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, 22:41 David Coudert, wrote: > >> I don't know why, but apparently I don't receive notification emails from >> the trac server since a couple of da

Re: [sage-devel] trac notification emails

On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, 22:41 David Coudert, wrote: > I don't know why, but apparently I don't receive notification emails from > the trac server since a couple of days. Did I miss some configuration > change ? > Are others having the same issue ? > I checked logs, everything is in order on the send

[sage-devel] trac notification emails

I don't know why, but apparently I don't receive notification emails from the trac server since a couple of days. Did I miss some configuration change ? Are others having the same issue ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubs

Re: [sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

On Fri, 26 Feb 2021, 16:59 E. Madison Bray, wrote: > Ok, it is fixed and re-deployed: > > https://github.com/sagemath/sage_trac_plugin/commit/1ff66702f0f1a10a2cca50e9a728493d6ced791e thanks! > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 5:31 PM E. Madison Bray > wrote: > > > > Let me save you guys some time

Re: [sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 16:59, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > Ok, it is fixed and re-deployed: > https://github.com/sagemath/sage_trac_plugin/commit/1ff66702f0f1a10a2cca50e9a728493d6ced791e Thanks! I'll try it out on Monday... > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 5:31 PM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > > > Let m

Re: [sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

Ok, it is fixed and re-deployed: https://github.com/sagemath/sage_trac_plugin/commit/1ff66702f0f1a10a2cca50e9a728493d6ced791e On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 5:31 PM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > Let me save you guys some time and say I deployed a new version of the > sage_trac plug-in today. It worked on

Re: [sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

Let me save you guys some time and say I deployed a new version of the sage_trac plug-in today. It worked on all my tests but apparently there is a weird case where it doesn't. On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 16:46 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021, 15:42 John Cremona, wrote: > >> On Fri, 2

Re: [sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

On Fri, 26 Feb 2021, 15:42 John Cremona, wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 15:33, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > open a gitlab or github issue > > Do you mean here: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues ? > yes - or in a fork > > > > John > > > > > > it feels like a good day to finally abandon

Re: [sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 15:33, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > open a gitlab or github issue Do you mean here: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues ? John > > it feels like a good day to finally abandon this tzores and migrate to > something working without constant hassle, and which is not a mo

Re: [sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

open a gitlab or github issue it feels like a good day to finally abandon this tzores and migrate to something working without constant hassle, and which is not a money sink. CNRS, ping? On Fri, 26 Feb 2021, 15:26 John Cremona, wrote: > Too bad, I'll just have to start the weekend early! By

Re: [sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

Too bad, I'll just have to start the weekend early! By now I have nearly forgotten what ticket I wanted to open anyway... John On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 14:56, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 11:55 AM John Cremona wrote: > > > > https://trac.sagemath.org/newticket now raises a

Re: [sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 11:55 AM John Cremona wrote: > > https://trac.sagemath.org/newticket now raises an error: > > Trac detected an internal error: > KeyError: u'ticket_branch' reboot did not help. :-( The earliest such an error from log (they all look the same) KeyError: u'ticket_branch' 2

[sage-devel] trac internal error on making a new ticket

https://trac.sagemath.org/newticket now raises an error: Trac detected an internal error: KeyError: u'ticket_branch' John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: [sage-devel] Trac Error

There were 27GB of apache error and access logs going back years, so I deleted them: 15M trac_sagemath_org-error.log.1593388800 14M trac_sagemath_org-error.log.1593475200 16M trac_sagemath_org-error.log.1593561600 17M trac_sagemath_org-error.log.1593648000 14M trac_sagemath_org

Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: [sage-devel] Trac Error

I'll figure out how to fix this right now. On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 12:49 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > oh, "no space left on device". > > anyone? I am a.f.k. > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, 20:34 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-devel, > wrote: >> >> I am getting the following error trying to generate a merge

Re: [sage-devel] Trac Error

oh, "no space left on device". anyone? I am a.f.k. On Wed, 8 Jul 2020, 20:34 'Reimundo Heluani' via sage-devel, < sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I am getting the following error trying to generate a merge on trac, it > looks > like a full disk? > > Failure to create temporary git reposito

[sage-devel] Trac Error

I am getting the following error trying to generate a merge on trac, it looks like a full disk? Failure to create temporary git repository clone for merge preview of cbd2319dd12d941deede5b1550e6e5b686f2468a: Cloning into '/tmp/tmpCL92Zh'... done. error: unable to write file build/pkgs/rw/distr

Re: [sage-devel] Trac account request

On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 10:18:57 AM UTC-7, mathzeta2 wrote: > > one possibility is switching to trac. We already have > some wiki pages in trac [0]. This also makes it easier to link to > tickets, and the syntax is the same as in the ticket themselves. > > +1, as this would reduce the number

Re: [sage-devel] Trac account request

On 05/05/2020 13:09, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:15 AM Jean-Florent Raymond wrote: I would like to add stuff to https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.1 but I cannot do that with my github account (that I use to edit tickets). That's unfortunate. We urgently should

Re: [sage-devel] Trac account request

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:15 AM Jean-Florent Raymond wrote: > I would like to add stuff to > https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.1 but I cannot do that > with my github account (that I use to edit tickets). That's unfortunate. We urgently should look into a modern way to edit the wiki,

[sage-devel] Trac account request

Hello, I would like to add stuff to https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.1 but I cannot do that with my github account (that I use to edit tickets). Could someone create a proper trac account for me? Desired username: jfraymond. Best regards, Jean-Florent Raymond. -- You received this

Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: [sage-devel] Trac notification emails

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 2:01 AM Harald Schilly wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 7:27 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> Also, note that GCE has an option of sending emails via G-suite, >> perhaps if someone already has G-suite it might come out better. >> > > G-Suite has an email relay server, wh

Re: [sage-devel] Trac notification emails

On 4/26/20 12:11 AM, William wrote: > > We pay $15/month for a plan that lets trac.sagemath.org's send up to 40K > emails (they charge when we go over).  During the last month, trac sent > 23,237 emails.     Maybe there is a really good competitor for email > today.  That page I linked to above sa

Re: [sagemath-admins] Re: [sage-devel] Trac notification emails

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 7:27 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Also, note that GCE has an option of sending emails via G-suite, > perhaps if someone already has G-suite it might come out better. > G-Suite has an email relay server, where the limit is 10k per day, more or less. It's not hard to set it u

Re: [sage-devel] Trac notification emails

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 12:11 PM William wrote: > > > > On Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 6:27:21 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> Trac server is hosted on Google Compute Engine (or whatever it's >> called now), which >> disallows outgoing SMTP. > > > True. Docs here: https://cloud.google.com/co

Re: [sage-devel] Trac notification emails

On Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 6:27:21 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Trac server is hosted on Google Compute Engine (or whatever it's > called now), which > disallows outgoing SMTP. > True. Docs here: https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/tutorials/sending-mail > (also, it seems tha

Re: [sage-devel] Trac notification emails

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 8:52 AM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 4/25/20 8:28 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > We talk about 20-40K emails per month. > > I believe that one would need a properly configured host > > with correcrty set up DNS, SPF, DKIM, etc etc to make many mail servers > > happy, a

Re: [sage-devel] Trac notification emails

On 4/25/20 8:28 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > We talk about 20-40K emails per month. > I believe that one would need a properly configured host > with correcrty set up DNS, SPF, DKIM, etc etc to make many mail servers > happy, as most people have no control over email whitelisting. > And it has to

Re: [sage-devel] Trac notification emails

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 7:22 AM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > Can we please change how our Trac notification emails are sent? SendGrid > is absolutely atrocious. I currently have six of their shared IPs > whitelisted on our mail server to allow these notifications through, > because they would other

[sage-devel] Trac notification emails

Can we please change how our Trac notification emails are sent? SendGrid is absolutely atrocious. I currently have six of their shared IPs whitelisted on our mail server to allow these notifications through, because they would otherwise be blocked by the many many many blacklists that SendGrid is a

[sage-devel] Trac server is crawling today...

Response is too slow to get anything done. Any idea why? Can somebody reboot something? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@goo

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:39 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > Le lundi 16 décembre 2019 16:13:09 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : > > [ Bandwidth savings... ] > >> > What I mean is that a Windows program can't call a Cygwin program >> > "transparently" and, vice-versa, a Cygwin program can't tran

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

Le lundi 16 décembre 2019 16:13:09 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : [ Bandwidth savings... ] > What I mean is that a Windows program can't call a Cygwin program > "transparently" and, vice-versa, a Cygwin program can't transparently call > a Windows program. Some common operatins (redirection

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, 15:10 Emmanuel Charpentier, < emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le lundi 16 décembre 2019 15:28:16 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : >> >> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:06 AM E. Madison Bray >> wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 5:16 PM Emmanuel Charpentier >> > w

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:01 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > > > Le lundi 16 décembre 2019 12:06:52 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : >> >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 5:16 PM Emmanuel Charpentier >> wrote: >> > >> > Le vendredi 13 décembre 2019 14:12:01 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : >> >> >> >>

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

Le lundi 16 décembre 2019 15:28:16 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:06 AM E. Madison Bray > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 5:16 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > > > wrote: > > > > > > Le vendredi 13 décembre 2019 14:12:01 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : > >

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

Le lundi 16 décembre 2019 12:06:52 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 5:16 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > > wrote: > > > > Le vendredi 13 décembre 2019 14:12:01 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:05 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > >> wrote:

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 11:06 AM E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 5:16 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > wrote: > > > > Le vendredi 13 décembre 2019 14:12:01 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:05 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > While

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 5:16 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > Le vendredi 13 décembre 2019 14:12:01 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : >> >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:05 PM Emmanuel Charpentier >> wrote: >> > >> > While we are already late in the Sage 9 release cycle, Trac#28877, which >> > is a

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 4:26 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > > > Le vendredi 13 décembre 2019 14:46:08 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : >> >> with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27870 ready soon > > > I didn't see it becoming needs_review. I'll have a look ASAP. (But don't > homd your breath

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

Le vendredi 13 décembre 2019 14:46:08 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27870 ready soon I didn't see it becoming needs_review. I'll have a look ASAP. (But don't homd your breath : we also have a government to topple... ;-). > (in some form > good f

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

Le vendredi 13 décembre 2019 14:12:01 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit : > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:05 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > > wrote: > > > > While we are already late in the Sage 9 release cycle, Trac#28877, which > is a (routine) upgrade of R to the current release, may be of benefit. >

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27870 ready soon (in some form good for the users of openblas, at least), the last hurdle that prevents the use of system R, its dependence on (open)blas, should be cleared, and I'll plan to get it fixed then. On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 1:12 PM E. Madison Bray w

Re: [sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:05 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > While we are already late in the Sage 9 release cycle, Trac#28877, which is a > (routine) upgrade of R to the current release, may be of benefit. > For non-R-users : using the latest released R is almost a sine qua non to get > help

[sage-devel] Trac #28877 may benefit from review.

While we are already late in the Sage 9 release cycle, Trac#28877 , which is a (routine) upgrade of R to the current release, may be of benefit. For non-R-users : using the latest released R is almost a *sine qua non* to get help from the R-help mailing li

[sage-devel] Trac#28534 needs review

A garden-variety upgrade of sqlite to 3.29.0, needed by some R packages, Trac#28534 needs review. Mentioned here because of the time needed for its review: sqlite is pretty deep un Sage's dependency tree, and upgrading it requires a *lot* of recompilatio

Re: [sagemath-admins] Fwd: [sage-devel] Trac down?

inly by > > cgit, 40-50 processes, taking all CPUs... > > I'll reboot again, but I don't know what to do to fix this properly. > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > From: Travis Scrimshaw > > Date: Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:50 PM > &

Re: [sagemath-admins] Fwd: [sage-devel] Trac down?

7;ll reboot again, but I don't know what to do to fix this properly. > > > > -- Forwarded message - > > From: Travis Scrimshaw > > Date: Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:50 PM > > Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Trac down? > > To: sage-devel > > > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Travis Scrimshaw > > Date: Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:50 PM > Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Trac down? > To: sage-devel > > > > I think it has gone back down. :/ > > Best, > Travis > > > On Thurs

Fwd: [sage-devel] Trac down?

ject: Re: [sage-devel] Trac down? To: sage-devel I think it has gone back down. :/ Best, Travis On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 3:26:44 AM UTC+10, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 19:20:50 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : >> >> OK, all should be bac

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

I think it has gone back down. :/ Best, Travis On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 3:26:44 AM UTC+10, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 19:20:50 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : >> >> OK, all should be back to normal. If not, please shout... >> >> Thanks DIma! > Everything is fine

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

Le mercredi 24 avril 2019 19:20:50 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > OK, all should be back to normal. If not, please shout... > > Thanks DIma! Everything is fine now. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from t

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

OK, all should be back to normal. If not, please shout... On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > will reboot soon again, please bear with me. > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:05 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > rebooted, seems to be back up. > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:59 P

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

will reboot soon again, please bear with me. On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:05 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > rebooted, seems to be back up. > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:59 PM Eric Gourgoulhon > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > It seems the page https://trac.sagemath.org/ is not responding. > > It was OK a

Re: [sage-devel] Trac down?

rebooted, seems to be back up. On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:59 PM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems the page https://trac.sagemath.org/ is not responding. > It was OK an hour ago or so. > One can perform "git pull" from Trac though (i.e. git://trac.sagemath.org/ is > up). > > Eric. > > -

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >