On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 07:06:01PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> WHERE DO WE STAND?
> Here's the Sage doctest coverage status:
>
> We need 296 more function to get to 68% coverage.
> We need 756 more function to get to 70% coverage.
> We need 1905 more function to get to 75% coverag
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:10 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> FYI: I have started a wiki page at
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/doc4
We will start at 9am tomorrow morning. Latecomers and earlycomers
welcome too. Everyone welcome.
Login to sage.math.washington.edu with ssh
Run irssi
/server irc.freeno
FYI: I have started a wiki page at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/doc4
If you are working on any coverage at the moment and/or have any
relevant tickets please add them there so we avoid duplication of
work.
Re p-adics: It would be nice if the doctesting issues at #5499 could
be resolved so that p
2009/4/10 Robert Bradshaw :
>
> On Apr 10, 2009, at 10:08 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:51 AM, David Roe
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:40 AM, John Cremona
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> :-) There's a patch in trac (#4637) adding documentation to p-
>>>
On Apr 10, 2009, at 10:08 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:51 AM, David Roe
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:40 AM, John Cremona
>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> :-) There's a patch in trac (#4637) adding documentation to p-
>> adics, and
>> I'm going to write a bun
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:51 AM, David Roe wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:40 AM, John Cremona
> wrote:
>>
>> 2009/4/10 William Stein :
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:43 AM, John Cremona
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2009/4/10 William Stein :
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:09 AM
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:40 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> 2009/4/10 William Stein :
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:43 AM, John Cremona
> wrote:
> >>
> >> 2009/4/10 William Stein :
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:09 AM, John Cremona
> wrote:
>
> For me the trouble with extended
2009/4/10 William Stein :
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:43 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> 2009/4/10 William Stein :
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:09 AM, John Cremona
>>> wrote:
For me the trouble with extended_*.py is that I have no idea what they
aactually are, so it is hard
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:43 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> 2009/4/10 William Stein :
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:09 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>>
>>> For me the trouble with extended_*.py is that I have no idea what they
>>> aactually are, so it is hard to get started
>>
>> But aren't you ju
2009/4/10 William Stein :
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:09 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> For me the trouble with extended_*.py is that I have no idea what they
>> aactually are, so it is hard to get started
>
> But aren't you just dying to find out what they are? :-)
Well... I did not even
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:09 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> For me the trouble with extended_*.py is that I have no idea what they
> aactually are, so it is hard to get started
But aren't you just dying to find out what they are? :-)
William
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
I can work on that tomorrow, in addition to p-adics.
David
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> We will have a docday this Saturday, with the insanely ambitious goal
> >> of getting to 70%. This is probably n
For me the trouble with extended_*.py is that I have no idea what they
aactually are, so it is hard to get started
John
2009/4/10 William Stein :
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> We will have a docday this Saturday, with the insanely ambitious goal
>>> of ge
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
>>
>> We will have a docday this Saturday, with the insanely ambitious goal
>> of getting to 70%. This is probably not humanely possible for a
>> single person to do in 8 hours, so I hope I'm not the only one (I
>> estimate it takes *at least*
>
> We will have a docday this Saturday, with the insanely ambitious goal
> of getting to 70%. This is probably not humanely possible for a
> single person to do in 8 hours, so I hope I'm not the only one (I
> estimate it takes *at least* 3 minutes per doctest, which comes to
> 37.8 hours for 756
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:32 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 9, 5:53 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, davidloeffler
>> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Great. I've refereed this (positively). You fixed *numerous* bugs in
>> the code, imho, when writing those 28 new doctests --
On Apr 9, 5:53 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, davidloeffler
> wrote:
> Great. I've refereed this (positively). You fixed *numerous* bugs in
> the code, imho, when writing those 28 new doctests -- great work!
> Let's keep the doctest patches coming.
Yep, note
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, davidloeffler wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 9, 9:45 am, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> I hope those of you who feel qualified to write doctests, will help
>> out. It's nearly impossible for one person to do all 1900 of those
>> doctests in the next month. Writing doctests
On Apr 9, 9:45 am, William Stein wrote:
>
> I hope those of you who feel qualified to write doctests, will help
> out. It's nearly impossible for one person to do all 1900 of those
> doctests in the next month. Writing doctests is not easy and it
> absolutely requires experience experience wi
David Roe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
> rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 9, 2009, at 1:49 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>>> Can we at the same time convert more files to ReST and hence get them
>>> included in the Reference manual? Although that manual
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2009, at 1:49 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> > Can we at the same time convert more files to ReST and hence get them
> > included in the Reference manual? Although that manual is long, there
> > is a
On Apr 9, 2009, at 1:49 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> Can we at the same time convert more files to ReST and hence get them
> included in the Reference manual? Although that manual is long, there
> is a whole lot of stuff not mentioned in it, which is bad PR.
>
> What I mean in practice is, if someo
Can we at the same time convert more files to ReST and hence get them
included in the Reference manual? Although that manual is long, there
is a whole lot of stuff not mentioned in it, which is bad PR.
What I mean in practice is, if someone is going through a source file
whose doctests are incom
23 matches
Mail list logo
