David Roe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Robert Bradshaw < > rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: > >> On Apr 9, 2009, at 1:49 AM, John Cremona wrote: >> >>> Can we at the same time convert more files to ReST and hence get them >>> included in the Reference manual? Although that manual is long, there >>> is a whole lot of stuff not mentioned in it, which is bad PR. >>> >>> What I mean in practice is, if someone is going through a source file >>> whose doctests are incomplete and also old-style, then they convert >>> each to new-style as they go, as well as (at the same time as) adding >>> the new doctests. >> That seems like a good idea to me. > > > I've seen the guide to ReST, but is there a document somewhere summarizing > what usually needs to be done to Sage functions? Is changing EXAMPLES: to > EXAMPLES:: and adding a newline after it usually enough?
I thought Mike Hansen had some tools to (largely) automate the conversion. Were those merged into Sage, or are they available somewhere? Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
