For me the trouble with extended_*.py is that I have no idea what they aactually are, so it is hard to get started....
John 2009/4/10 William Stein <wst...@gmail.com>: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Alex Ghitza <aghi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> We will have a docday this Saturday, with the insanely ambitious goal >>> of getting to 70%. This is probably not humanely possible for a >>> single person to do in 8 hours, so I hope I'm not the only one (I >>> estimate it takes *at least* 3 minutes per doctest, which comes to >>> 37.8 hours for 756 doctests). >> > > I just noticed that doctesting extended_integer_ring.py would make a > really big dent -- it has 128 functions in it of which only 4% are > doctested now, most functions are very easy to doctest, *and* > extended_rational_field.py, which should be very similar, has 98% > coverage. If somebody wants to easily make a big dent in the > coverage problem, volunteer now to doctest extended_integer_ring.py, > and do it asap: > > rings/extended_integer_ring.py: 4% (6 of 128) > rings/extended_rational_field.py: 98% (73 of 74) > > -- William > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
