Re: [sage-devel] Problem building sage-5.11.beta2

2013-06-21 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 06/21/2013 12:47 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 06/20/2013 07:51 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> It is easy to provide a working patch, but why was this compilation done >> with -Werror set? > Good question, it's only this one file which is compiled with -Werror.

[sage-devel] Problem building sage-5.11.beta2

2013-06-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
This is in the build of ppl-1.0.p0, on FreeBSD-8.2, using its gcc46 compiler. The relevant lines seem to be: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../interfaces/C -I/usr/home/stephen/sage-devel/work/sage-5.11.beta2/local/include -pedantic -std=gnu89 -Werror -g -O2 -frounding-math -pipe -Wl,-rpath

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage-5.10.beta5 build error for scipy-0.12.0.p0.log

2013-05-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/27/2013 04:55 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Monday, May 27, 2013 11:49:04 PM UTC+2, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > On 05/27/2013 04:36 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, May 27, 2013 11:32:20

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage-5.10.beta5 build error for scipy-0.12.0.p0.log

2013-05-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/27/2013 04:36 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Monday, May 27, 2013 11:32:20 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Monday, May 27, 2013 11:27:58 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > IIRC scipy adds strange prefix to atlas library names on FreeBSD > (_r

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage-5.10.beta5 build error for scipy-0.12.0.p0.log

2013-05-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
out removing > the (reference) blas and lapack spkg, it seems scipy found the libraries > built by the blas and lapack spkgs. > > On Monday, May 27, 2013 11:17:08 PM UTC+2, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > There isn't one. It looks like scipy uses setup.py instead o

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage-5.10.beta5 build error for scipy-0.12.0.p0.log

2013-05-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
There isn't one. It looks like scipy uses setup.py instead of configure. On 05/27/2013 04:06 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > And config.log from scipy build folder? > > On Monday, May 27, 2013 10:59:12 PM UTC+2, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > On 05/27/2013 03:55 P

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage-5.10.beta5 build error for scipy-0.12.0.p0.log

2013-05-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/27/2013 03:55 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > Heyn > > On Monday, May 27, 2013 9:52:59 PM UTC+2, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > This is building with the FreeBSD port, using > SAGE_ATLAS_LIB=/usr/local/lib. > > I really don't know what to

[sage-devel] sage-5.10.beta5 build error for scipy-0.12.0.p0.log

2013-05-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
This is building with the FreeBSD port, using SAGE_ATLAS_LIB=/usr/local/lib. I really don't know what to look for, or which errors are fatal and which are just warnings. See attachment. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SQRT of negative number is negative? Or positive? Or what?

2013-05-13 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/13/2013 04:56 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > On Monday, May 13, 2013 2:11:59 PM UTC-7, ManDay wrote: > > Could anyone shed a bit of light on this? > > The more I try, the more SAGE's types get in my way. It turns out to be > an unpredictable element. Unless I make sure *every* inv

[sage-devel] Resource problem building sage

2013-04-26 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
When I build sage, during the build of maxima-5.29.1.p1 it executes the command sequence: make[6]: Entering directory `/usr/home/stephen/sage-devel/work/sage-5.9.rc0/spkg/build/maxima-5.29.1.p1/src/interfaces/xmaxima' tclsh < /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1 && \ (cd Tkmaxima ; \ ec

Re: [sage-devel] test failures for 5.9.beta0

2013-04-06 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Just to tell people that the first and second errors listed below no longer occur with 5.9.beta3. As for the third error, I have a trac ticket that fixes it: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14392 On 03/20/2013 10:09 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > This is under FreeBSD. (Th

Re: [sage-devel] test failures for 5.9.beta0

2013-03-21 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 03/21/2013 02:03 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2013-03-21 04:09, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> 1. I notice that many tests (like "sage -t >> devel/sage/sage/rings/arith.py") are run three times. > Any suspicious environment variables? What is > $ env

[sage-devel] test failures for 5.9.beta0

2013-03-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
This is under FreeBSD. (There are other failures, but so far they are all legitimate floating point disagreements, or similar to the ones I report here.) 1. I notice that many tests (like "sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/arith.py") are run three times. 2. I get some strange errors like "sage -t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-19 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 03/19/2013 06:07 AM, leif wrote: > Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> On 2013-03-19 04:30, John H Palmieri wrote: >>> Is there any good way of testing whether multithreading is broken >> That would of course be ideal, but we should first find out exactly >> why/how it's broken on FreeBSD. > > Yep. As sa

Re: [sage-devel] Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 03/17/2013 02:48 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 03/09/2013 06:40 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: >> Building on FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes at some point I have done more investigation. The following patch fixes the problem, so it is definitely a p

Re: [sage-devel] Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-17 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 03/09/2013 06:40 PM, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > Building on FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes after this point: > > [history_a] loading pickled environment... not yet created > [history_a] building [inventory]: targets for 1 source files that are > out of date > [history_a] upda

[sage-devel] Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Building on FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes after this point: [history_a] loading pickled environment... not yet created [history_a] building [inventory]: targets for 1 source files that are out of date [history_a] updating environment: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 removed [history_a] reading s

[sage-devel] Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Building on FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes after this point: [history_a] loading pickled environment... not yet created [history_a] building [inventory]: targets for 1 source files that are out of date [history_a] updating environment: 1 added, 0 changed, 0 removed [history_a] reading s

[sage-devel] Problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Building on FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes after this point: [history_a] writing output... [100%] index [history_a] dumping object inventory... done [history_a] build succeeded. P.S. I sent this email twice before. Perhaps google flagged it as spam. -- You received this messag

[sage-devel] Google groups suck

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
This is the 3rd time I tried sending this message. I think it gets flagged as spam by google. I have a problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4. On FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes after this point: [history_a] writing output... [100%] index [history_a] dumping object inventory...

[sage-devel] Google groups suck

2013-03-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
This is the 4th time I tried sending this message. I think it gets flagged as spam by google. I have a problems building docs on sage-5.8.beta4. On FreeBSD, the doc creation process freezes. I cannot tell you where, because the text must be flagged as spam. If this when gets through, I'll try

Re: [sage-devel] Error building sage-5.7.beta1 on FreeBSD

2013-01-28 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/28/2013 02:47 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Could you please provide the complete build log of SciPy and ATLAS? > Do you still need it? I deleted the build, so I would need to rebuild it to get it back. Also, the FreeBSD version of sage uses FreeBSD's port of atlas. -- You received this

[sage-devel] Error building sage-5.7.beta1 on FreeBSD

2013-01-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I am getting this error when building scipy-0.11.0.p0. /usr/home/stephen/sage-devel/work/sage-5.7.beta1/local/bin/gfortran -Wall -shared -Wl,-rpath=/usr/home/stephen/sage-devel/work/sage-5.7.beta1/local/lib -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc46 build/temp.freebsd-8.3-STABLE-amd64-2.7/build/src.freebsd-

Re: [sage-devel] Build error for sage 5.5

2012-12-26 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 12/26/2012 11:23 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 6:51:42 AM UTC-5, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2012-12-25 20:22, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > When I am building sage-5.5 inside of sage-5.5 > What does this mean? If it mean

Re: [sage-devel] Build error for sage 5.5

2012-12-25 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 12/25/2012 01:22 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > When I am building sage-5.5 inside of sage-5.5, I get the following > error in my build log. I was able to build sage-5.5.rc1 with no > problem. Am I unique with this problem? I am building under FreeBSD-8.2. > > &g

[sage-devel] Build error for sage 5.5

2012-12-25 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
When I am building sage-5.5 inside of sage-5.5, I get the following error in my build log. I was able to build sage-5.5.rc1 with no problem. Am I unique with this problem? I am building under FreeBSD-8.2. gcc -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -pipe -Wl,-rpath=/usr/ports/math/sa

Re: [sage-devel] Maxima slashdotted, Sage in comments

2012-12-15 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 12/15/2012 08:51 PM, kcrisman wrote: > Just sayin'. > > http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/12/14/214231/ask-slashdot-replacing-a-ti-84-with-software-on-a-linux-box > > and then check the comments. The original poster didn't like maxima, because it doesn't have a "degrees" button where all t

[sage-devel] Another /bin/bash error

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
While trying to compile sage-5.4beta1 on FreeBSD, it failed because of another place using "#!/bin/bash". As I understand it, it should be "#!/usr/bin/env bash". This time it is in fflas_ffpack-1.6.0//src/fflas-ffpack-config.in I'll file a ticket (except trac.sage isn't working for me right n

Re: [sage-devel] Re: jmol/sage-5.4beta0/FreeBSD problem

2012-09-12 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I am "top-posting" agnostic. So when I reply to a top poster, I top post. When replying to a bottom poster I bottom post. But On 09/12/12 07:21, kcrisman wrote: Great! On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:39:21 AM UTC-4, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Yes, that wor

Re: [sage-devel] Re: jmol/sage-5.4beta0/FreeBSD problem

2012-09-12 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Yes, that works as well. (Is it OK to top post in this mailing list?) On 09/12/2012 04:26 AM, Volker Braun wrote: Or the third and most portable way: #!/usr/bin/env bash On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 4:22:32 AM UTC+1, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Unfortunately in FreeBSD, this has

[sage-devel] jmol/sage-5.4beta0/FreeBSD problem

2012-09-11 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
The package jmol contains testjava.sh. The top of the file is #!/bin/bash Unfortunately in FreeBSD, this has to be one of: #!/usr/local/bin/bash or #!/bin/sh Do I need to create a ticket, or will the creator of jmol see this email, and make this simple change? Thanks, Stephen -- You recei

Re: [sage-devel] Test compile of sage-5.1.rc1 successful

2012-07-09 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 07/09/12 08:45, John W. Foster wrote: Jan: I did as you suggested & restarted the compiling process on my system. I did have to restart it 2 times to get it to finish, but I do have it running now and it appears fine. I will be testing it out and look forward to the final release. Thanks for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sympow bug

2012-06-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 06/20/2012 03:16 PM, kcrisman wrote: On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:40:24 PM UTC-4, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 06/20/2012 02:30 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:25:44 PM UTC-4, leif wrote: > > On 19 Apr., 05:33, Ste

Atlas/lapack issue [was: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure for sage-5.1.beta5]

2012-06-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 06/20/2012 02:34 PM, kcrisman wrote: Another reason I want to use the FreeBSD port build of gcc-4.6 is this. The work required to get atlas to build on FreeBSd is huge. I don't want to mess with copying all those patches into sage. But the port build of atlas requires the Free

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sympow bug

2012-06-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 06/20/2012 02:30 PM, kcrisman wrote: On Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:25:44 PM UTC-4, leif wrote: On 19 Apr., 05:33, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I think I have found the problem with sympow. It is nothing to do with > elliptic curves. It is simply a mallo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure for sage-5.1.beta5

2012-06-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 06/20/2012 01:39 PM, kcrisman wrote: I'm a little confused on why http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5873 wasn't necessary, since you used newer versions of FreeBSD. That should have generated some kind of key error at https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/blob/master/setupext.py#L

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure for sage-5.1.beta5

2012-06-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 06/20/2012 11:05 AM, kcrisman wrote: On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:21:31 PM UTC-4, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 06/19/2012 07:29 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > > On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:28:29 PM UTC-4, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > W

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure for sage-5.1.beta5

2012-06-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 06/20/2012 01:39 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2012-06-20 04:21, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I got a whole different set of errors: Sorry to ask the obvious, but did you run ./sage -b? I must admit that I didn't know about ./sage -b. I ended up rebuilding the whole of sage, wit

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Failure for sage-5.1.beta5

2012-06-19 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 06/19/2012 07:29 PM, kcrisman wrote: On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:28:29 PM UTC-4, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: When I run "sage testall" for sage-5.1.beta5 on FreeBSD/amd64, I get the Does this imply you get no other failures? Even close to that would be great news

[sage-devel] Failure for sage-5.1.beta5

2012-06-19 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
When I run "sage testall" for sage-5.1.beta5 on FreeBSD/amd64, I get the following failure, which is new since version 5.0: File "/usr/home/stephen/sage-devel/work/sage-5.1.beta5/devel/sage/sage/rings/real_double.pyx", line 1741: sage: all( check_error(x) for x in sxrange(0.01, 2.00, 0.01

Re: [sage-devel] sage-5.0.1.rc0 released

2012-05-29 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
What does the acronym "FAT" in "SAGE_FAT_BINARY" refer to? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Cephes licence : repackage?

2012-05-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/20/2012 10:44 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 05/20/2012 10:39 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: On 05/20/12 03:38 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 05/20/2012 06:50 AM, David Kirkby wrote: On 20 May 2012 00:58, Volker Braun wrote: Currently, the cephes package only prints: &qu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Cephes licence : repackage?

2012-05-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/20/2012 10:39 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: On 05/20/12 03:38 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 05/20/2012 06:50 AM, David Kirkby wrote: On 20 May 2012 00:58, Volker Braun wrote: Currently, the cephes package only prints: "We do not install the cephes library on any operating s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Cephes licence : repackage?

2012-05-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/20/2012 06:50 AM, David Kirkby wrote: On 20 May 2012 00:58, Volker Braun wrote: Currently, the cephes package only prints: "We do not install the cephes library on any operating system except Cygwin." I believe when someone else (I forget who), was working on the FreeBSD port, he need

Re: [sage-devel] PolyBoRi requires boost library

2012-05-17 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/17/2012 11:24 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: As noted on sage-support, the sage-5.0 *binary* requires the boost library libboost_unit_test_framework at runtime, if the binary was built on such a machine. I.e. PolyBoRi checks for boost_unit_test_framework and links against it if available. This

Re: [sage-devel] optional packages [was: sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD]

2012-05-02 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/02/2012 02:18 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 05/02/12 12:46, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 4:01:09 PM UTC, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I just built sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD. When I do make test, one of the test failures is puzzling me: sage -t -force_lib

Re: [sage-devel] optional packages [was: sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD]

2012-05-02 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/02/2012 02:18 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 05/02/12 12:46, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 4:01:09 PM UTC, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I just built sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD. When I do make test, one of the test failures is puzzling me: sage -t -force_lib

Re: [sage-devel] Re: optional packages [was: sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD]

2012-05-02 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/02/2012 04:18 PM, kcrisman wrote: On May 2, 3:43 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2012-05-02 21:18, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:> Would it be fair to say that the optional packages should be considered unreliable? Indeed. That could be one of the reasons they are conside

Re: [sage-devel] optional packages [was: sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD]

2012-05-02 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 05/02/12 12:46, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 4:01:09 PM UTC, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I just built sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD. When I do make test, one of the test failures is puzzling me: sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/tests/start

[sage-devel] sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD

2012-05-02 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I just built sage-5.0.rc0 on FreeBSD. When I do make test, one of the test failures is puzzling me: sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/tests/startup.py" ** File "/usr/home/stephen/sage-devel/work/sage-5.0.rc0/devel/sage/sage

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Issue in parallel/use_fork.py

2012-04-21 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
fires? If that is the case we should probably ignore it in use_fork.py On Saturday, April 21, 2012 3:36:44 PM UTC-4, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I did some research, and I found that you are completely correct. I don't know why FreeBSD is misbehaving, because the os.wait co

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Issue in parallel/use_fork.py

2012-04-21 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
:39:13 AM UTC-4, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: In parallel/use_fork.py, around line 120, there seems to be a race problem. This seems to be a genuine problem with my FreeBSD build: sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.py" goes into a permanent loop. Supp

[sage-devel] Issue in parallel/use_fork.py

2012-04-20 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
In parallel/use_fork.py, around line 120, there seems to be a race problem. This seems to be a genuine problem with my FreeBSD build: sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/parallel/decorate.py" goes into a permanent loop. Suppose that timeout has been set, and the forked process is too slow. So

[sage-devel] sympow bug

2012-04-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I think I have found the problem with sympow. It is nothing to do with elliptic curves. It is simply a malloc/free error. In util.c there is a function free_data, which frees TACKS[0]. TACKS[0] is meant to be allocated in disk.c, but there are circumstances when TACKS[0] is not allocated.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: FreeBSD port of stage

2012-04-18 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 04/18/12 12:14, Dima Pasechnik wrote: The complex_double.pyx problem seems to be PARI-related. Is there a PARI port of FreeBSD? Yes there is. it is version 2.3.5, which is several versions earlier than sage is using. What pari commands can I use to test if the problem is the same for pa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: FreeBSD port of stage

2012-04-15 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 04/15/2012 12:14 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 04/14/2012 09:33 PM, kcrisman wrote: I would appreciate any help understanding the cause of the remaining errors. Luckily, first we want it to build - then we can fix the errors. Most look fairly technical - does sympow not work on

Re: [sage-devel] Re: FreeBSD port of stage

2012-04-14 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 04/14/2012 09:33 PM, kcrisman wrote: I would appreciate any help understanding the cause of the remaining errors. Luckily, first we want it to build - then we can fix the errors. Most look fairly technical - does sympow not work on it, for instance? The errors in complex_double.pyx bother

Re: [sage-devel] Compiling linbox on FreeBSD

2012-03-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 03/27/2012 02:10 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2012-03-27 20:05, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Actually the error appeared with beta9. The error seems to have disappeared with beta10. Are you *sure* it was beta9 and not an earlier version? There was a change in Linbox in sage-5.0.beta8

Re: [sage-devel] Compiling linbox on FreeBSD

2012-03-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 03/27/2012 10:58 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2012-03-27 17:52, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am attempting to compile sage-5.0.beta10. I see there is a new patch in linbox for commentator.C. But it is not working for me. Could you at least say why it's not working? How does it

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Compiling linbox on FreeBSD

2012-03-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 03/27/2012 11:03 AM, leif wrote: On 27 Mrz., 17:52, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am attempting to compile sage-5.0.beta10. I see there is a new patch in linbox for commentator.C. But it is not working for me. The attached patch did work for me, and I was wondering if it would be a

[sage-devel] Compiling linbox on FreeBSD

2012-03-27 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I am attempting to compile sage-5.0.beta10. I see there is a new patch in linbox for commentator.C. But it is not working for me. The attached patch did work for me, and I was wondering if it would be a problem for anyone else if this patch was used instead. This is a replacement for linbox

Re: [sage-devel] I^(0.5)

2012-02-15 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 02/15/2012 12:34 AM, William Stein wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: On 02/15/12 05:58 AM, William Stein wrote: Hi, A student in my class (Andrey Sarantsev) just pointed out to me that in Sage-4.8 and Sage-5.0, we have sage: I^(0.5) None What? That's not

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-02-01 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 02/01/2012 03:31 PM, David Kirkby wrote: On 22 January 2012 21:54, Stephen Montgomery-Smith mailto:step...@missouri.edu>> wrote: I fixed the problem as follows: sed -i .bak -e 's/Commentator/Commensator/g' \ That's not a fix. The POSIX definition of '

Re: [sage-devel] Re: FreeBSD and Sage - ccosh

2012-01-30 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/30/2012 08:27 PM, kcrisman wrote: Just to make sure this is found by anyone searching this thread: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12399 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12400 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12401 are followup tickets with some of the stuff fr

[sage-devel] hard coding of paths

2012-01-25 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
So if you move the sage-4.8 directory, and run sage, it recodes various paths. Can someone tell me where in the source code these operations are programmed? And which files are touched by this operation? Thanks, Stephen -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com

Re: [sage-devel] Re: FreeBSD and Sage - ccosh

2012-01-24 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/24/12 08:31, kcrisman wrote: I just found this.http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/9543/cephes-2.8 I'm trying it now. It caused build errors in other sub-packages. But I have spent too many late nights on figuring out the FreeBSD build, and I am going to have to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: FreeBSD and Sage - ccosh

2012-01-24 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/24/2012 07:56 AM, kcrisman wrote: On Jan 24, 12:19 am, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/23/2012 05:40 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/23/2012 12:34 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2012-01-23 14:27, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: "ccosh" not found seemed lik

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage - parallel building of docs

2012-01-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Looking in http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/source.html it says that "make -j4" is respected. This works really great when building the source code. But the documentation also suggests that it should be building in parallel when creating the documentation? Should there by 4 invocatio

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage - ccosh

2012-01-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/23/2012 05:40 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/23/2012 12:34 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2012-01-23 14:27, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: "ccosh" not found seemed like a common error. This might be solvable by installing cephes on FreeBSD. This is included in Sag

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/23/2012 05:40 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/23/2012 12:34 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2012-01-23 14:27, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: "ccosh" not found seemed like a common error. This might be solvable by installing cephes on FreeBSD. This is included in Sag

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/23/2012 05:52 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/23/2012 04:39 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/23/2012 08:12 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: missing ccosh probably is a deficiency of libc/libm on your system. Can you compile/link #include #include int main() { double

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/23/2012 04:39 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/23/2012 08:12 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: missing ccosh probably is a deficiency of libc/libm on your system. Can you compile/link #include #include int main() { double complex x=ccosh(1.); } on your system, and what extra libs

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/23/2012 12:34 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2012-01-23 14:27, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: "ccosh" not found seemed like a common error. This might be solvable by installing cephes on FreeBSD. This is included in Sage but only installed on Cygwin. According to "spkg

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/23/2012 08:12 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: missing ccosh probably is a deficiency of libc/libm on your system. Can you compile/link #include #include int main() { double complex x=ccosh(1.); } on your system, and what extra libs does it need? On my system, complex cosh is the cosh functi

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/23/2012 07:27 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/22/2012 11:40 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I have tested this port at least up until a working sage is created. I am going to do a complete build tonight. In the meantime, others can try this out if they like. Also, I made

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-23 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/22/2012 11:40 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I have tested this port at least up until a working sage is created. I am going to do a complete build tonight. In the meantime, others can try this out if they like. So it built successfully. I ran "sage -testall" and it

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-22 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I have tested this port at least up until a working sage is created. I am going to do a complete build tonight. In the meantime, others can try this out if they like. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-d

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-22 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/22/2012 07:36 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: Since the problem appears to be related to linbox ... It was related to linbox. My "fix" using sed wasn't working. What I did was to rebuild linbox. I removed any reference to -DDISABLE_COMMENTATOR (which I did by hacking com

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-22 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
One thing I want to rule out is that the problem is created by python. FreeBSD has a working python version 2.7. How do I tell the sage build to use the FreeBSD python rather than building its own? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-22 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/22/2012 04:28 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/22/2012 04:24 PM, François Bissey wrote: On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:54:19 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/21/2012 08:23 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/21/2012 08:05 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am able to

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-22 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/22/2012 04:24 PM, François Bissey wrote: On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:54:19 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/21/2012 08:23 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/21/2012 08:05 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am able to build sage on FreeBSD. I have attached a tar file which

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-22 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/21/2012 08:23 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 01/21/2012 08:05 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am able to build sage on FreeBSD. I have attached a tar file which contains a "port" to build sage on FreeBSD. (FreeBSD users will know what I mean by a "port.&quo

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-22 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/22/2012 02:35 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: 2012/1/22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith: On 01/21/2012 08:05 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am able to build sage on FreeBSD. I have attached a tar file which contains a "port" to build sage on FreeBSD. (FreeBSD users

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-21 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/21/2012 08:05 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am able to build sage on FreeBSD. I have attached a tar file which contains a "port" to build sage on FreeBSD. (FreeBSD users will know what I mean by a "port.") It does seem to work, but it segfaul

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-21 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I am able to build sage on FreeBSD. I have attached a tar file which contains a "port" to build sage on FreeBSD. (FreeBSD users will know what I mean by a "port.") It does seem to work, but it segfaults on exit: %./sage -- |

Re: [sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-21 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 01/21/2012 03:27 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I am embarking on trying to build sage under FreeBSD. Thus far, the main problem that seems to be holding me up is when I try to build the sage4.8 subpackage. I get an error that says that sem_opn is not functioning. However I am using a

[sage-devel] FreeBSD and Sage

2012-01-21 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
I am embarking on trying to build sage under FreeBSD. Thus far, the main problem that seems to be holding me up is when I try to build the sage4.8 subpackage. I get an error that says that sem_opn is not functioning. However I am using a version of FreeBSD that has semaphores installed by de