Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 6.1.1 can't build PDF documentation for notebook

2014-02-10 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Volker, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Sorry, was too fast. Doesn't work for me either. Ticket is here: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15802 Thanks for the fix. Everything is good now. The documentation has been updated on the Sage website. -- Regards, Minh Va

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 6.1.1 can't build PDF documentation for notebook

2014-02-09 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Dima, On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> This is what I got when building the PDF version: >> >> ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8:┌ not set up for use with LaTeX. > > There was a thread here discussing the new banner... > > What version of TeX are you using? I

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 6.1.1 can't build PDF documentation for notebook

2014-02-09 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Harald, Sorry again for the late reply. I recently moved to a new place. It took over a week to get my network connection up and running. On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: > The release of 6.1 is close to happen. Have you already done something > for updating the docume

Re: [sage-devel] Sage 6.x documentation

2014-01-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > As noticed by Paul Zimmermann, http://www.sagemath.org/doc/ still points > to the documentation of Sage 5.13. For regular manuals, it shouldn't > make any difference until sage-6.1 is released, however the developer > guide is out of d

Re: [sage-devel] Mag Gam

2013-07-20 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, Sorry for the spam. I have banned this user from sage-devel. -- Regards, Minh Van Nguyen http://bit.ly/mvngu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an em

Re: [sage-devel] Broken link?

2013-06-20 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jan, On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > http://sagemath.org/download-linux.html says > > You can see the full list of mirror servers here. which goes to > > http://sagemath.org/mirrors.html which says > > error: please contact site admin. I don't think the link is broken

Re: [sage-devel] Re: use Sage!

2013-06-04 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi William, On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:41 AM, William Stein wrote: > Would somebody like Minh Nguyen be willing to do technical copyediting > in exchange for a percentage of sales? I might be crazy for saying this, but I would rather donate my time for copy editing than risk a confl

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Sage review in CMJ

2013-03-06 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi John, On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:32 AM, john_perry_usm wrote: > How rude! I pay for online access to MAA magazines (specifically!) and can't > see it yet from the MAA's own website, but for an extra $12 I can buy it > from JSTOR, and see a preview for free? X-O I believe there has been a break

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Sage review in CMJ

2013-03-06 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi John, On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:20 AM, john_perry_usm wrote: > I've logged onto the MAA website twice now and don't even see the March CMJ > available online, let alone that article. I hope it becomes available soon. You might want to try this link to JSTOR: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.416

Re: [sage-devel] Fix busted sage -valgrind

2013-02-06 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Michael, On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:13 AM, mabshoff wrote: > it has been a while, i.e.summer 2009 or so, and I no longer have my trac > account password nor do I recall the email address I used. Great to hear from you again! I've reconfigured your trac account. I'll contact you offlist about t

[sage-devel] Fwd: paper referencing & using Sage

2013-01-24 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, I was told about "NIFTY", a Python package for numerical information field theory. Don't know if anyone is interested in checking it out. -- Regards, Minh Van Nguyen http://bit.ly/mvngu -- Forwarded message -- From: Torsten Ensslin Date: Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:41 PM

Re: [sage-devel] hg.sagemath.org server error

2012-12-05 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Keshav, On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Keshav Kini wrote: > The sage-root repo seemingly isn't being served correctly, as the > following URL returns an HTTP 500: > > http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-root/ To be honest with you, I have spent the last hour trying to understand this. But I still d

Re: [sage-devel] Best practices for scientific computing

2012-11-11 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Nicolas, On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > I was just pointed to the following ref: «Best practices for > scientific computing» [1]. It is a good introduction for future > devs. Shall we refer to it from the dev manual? Absolutely. The paper contains lots of sensibl

[sage-devel] the new SHA-3 candidate Keccak uses Sage during its design

2012-10-03 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, Two pieces of good news today: * The new SHA-3 candidate has been announced following a five-year period of intense scrutiny. * The winner is Keccak, whose authors used Sage in the design of the algorithm. The news release is at http://www.nist.gov/itl/csd/sha-100212.cfm The specifi

Re: [sage-devel] social media APIs and Sage

2012-09-30 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Karl, On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:06 PM, kcrisman wrote: > With other things like twittercounter.com out there (I used this in class > the other day, in fact), there must be all kinds of ways to take Sage's > capabilities to take advantage of social media info like W|A does in that > link. Let

Re: [sage-devel] [Graph Theory Project] Reverse Cuthill-McKee

2012-09-28 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Raniere, Sorry for the very late reply. On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Raniere Gaia Silva wrote: > I will implement the Reverse Cuthill-McKee algorithm in the next months and > think do it as a new Sage feature. It's awesome that you are thinking about contributing. > I send a previous

Re: [sage-devel] Another paper acknowledging Sage

2012-09-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Anthony, On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Anthony David wrote: > "Parameter-free model discrimination criterion based on steady-state > coplanarity" Harrington et al. 2012 PNAS 109 (37) > > http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/04/1117073109.abstract Thanks for the pointer. This is now

Re: [sage-devel] Mirrors

2012-09-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jan, On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Is it possible to add the text "Stellenbosch University", "Tertiary Education > Network", Done. See the updated page: http://www.sagemath.org/mirrors.html -- Regards, Minh Van Nguyen http://bit.ly/mvngu -- You received this m

Re: [sage-devel] This year's bug days

2012-09-05 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi William, On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:11 AM, William Stein wrote: > Due to generous funding for this purpose, I'm planning to again > organize 4 Bug Days in the next year, and would like to start a thread > to discuss what/when/where/how. Please share any thoughts at all > *you* might have abou

Re: [sage-devel] Problem while compiling in red hat (Scientific linux)

2012-09-02 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Jorge Hernández Bernal wrote: > Any idea? I just need to run sage, I don't mind to install from binaries > or compile it. I could install another linux system if necesary. You might find a solution in the following post https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromg

Re: [sage-devel] libssl-dev required to build 5.2rc1

2012-07-27 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > You should add dpkg-dev for recent Debian/Ubuntu systems (and in fact, > gfortran is only needed on such systems, otherwise it's not required). Done. -- Regards, Minh Van Nguyen http://bit.ly/mvngu -- -- To post to this group, send an

Re: [sage-devel] libssl-dev required to build 5.2rc1

2012-07-26 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Charles, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:11 AM, charles Bouillaguet wrote: > Ergo, either > this extra dependency ought to be advertized, or there is something > wrong with me... This is a common problem. It's just that I'm too lazy to advertise a pre-emptive solution at http://www.sagemath.org/d

Re: [sage-devel] changelog.txt duplicates Sage 4.7

2012-07-25 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:46 AM, kcrisman wrote: > I don't know who would be for - Harald? Minh? - but I just noticed that > changelog.txt (the very valuable list of all tickets, almost) at > http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/src/changelog.txt has a full duplication of > Sage 4.7 stuff. It's fixed

Re: [sage-devel] doc test failures in 5.1

2012-07-22 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Neal Harris wrote: > What should I do about the ticket? Probably nothing. I applied the patch on the ticket, ran all tests, and I don't receive any doctest failures. Here are the precise commands that I used: $ ./sage --version Sage Version 5.2.rc0, Releas

Re: [sage-devel] How to... get 5.2rc0 ?

2012-07-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:46 PM, charles Bouillaguet wrote: > This is getting closer! > > Downloading packages from > 'http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.2.rc0//spkg'. > Reading package lists > 404 Error: Package server > 'http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.

Re: [sage-devel] How to... get 5.2rc0 ?

2012-07-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:36 PM, charles Bouillaguet wrote: > Thanks for the link. But isn't there any way to update my existing > SAGE installation without downloading the whole 300+ mb archive (and > recompiling everything, which takes a while)? Like, an equivalent of > sage -upgrade, or hg pull

Re: [sage-devel] How to... get 5.2rc0 ?

2012-07-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Charles, On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:28 PM, charles Bouillaguet wrote: > I know this must sound like a pretty stupid question, but how do I get > sage 5.2rc0, if only just to rebase a patch I wrote for an earlier > version against it? There must be something obvious I'm missing... Under the "Do

Re: [sage-devel] Ubuntu installation instructions

2012-07-11 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jan, On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Could we add PPA (Ubuntu 11.04 and higher) installation instructions to: > http://www.sagemath.org/doc/installation/binary.html#linux-and-os-x This is now ticket #13228: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13228 On the tick

Re: [sage-devel] New book on DE and Sage

2012-07-05 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:47 PM, kcrisman wrote: > Let's get this on the http://sagemath.org/library-publications.html#books > list! Done. -- Regards, Minh Van Nguyen http://bit.ly/mvngu -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, sen

Re: [sage-devel] And the 2012 Spies Sage Development Prize Winner is...

2012-06-18 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jason, Congratulations! You can find the prize citation at http://www.sagemath.org/development-prize.html in case it ever gets lost in the deluge of emails to sage-devel. -- Regards, Minh Van Nguyen http://bit.ly/mvngu -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co

Re: [sage-devel] Reference manual broken in sagemath.org

2012-06-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jeroen, On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> Thank you very much for the report. The problem has been fixed now. > Do you know what happened before, what went wrong? It has to do with the memory consumption of Sphinx. The HTML version of the reference manual refused to

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Days Ideas

2012-06-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Dan, On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Dan Drake wrote: > I dunno if this would be an "awesome" Sage Days, or if I should/can run > it, but at the recent Sage Days, we had the idea of getting some Sphinx > devs to come so we can get them to reduce Sphinx's memory consumption > and get it to bu

Re: [sage-devel] Reference manual broken in sagemath.org

2012-06-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:24 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: > Reference manual broken in sagemath.org > For instance: > http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/symbolic/expression.html > http://sagemath.org/doc/reference/index.html Thank you very much for the report. The problem has been fixed now

[sage-devel] catalogue of open-source textbooks

2012-05-11 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, The University of Minnesota is compiling a catalogue of open-source textbooks. See http://www1.umn.edu/news/news-releases/2012/UR_CONTENT_383497.html http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/05/10/university-minnesota-compiles-database-peer-reviewed-open-source-textbooks for the news

Re: [sage-devel] Sage mini-manual in Catalan

2012-04-16 Thread Minh Nguyen
Dear Jordi, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Jordi Guardia Rubies wrote: > Here you have my data: > > Full name: Jordi Guàrdia i Rúbies > Username: jordiguardia > Contact email address: guar...@ma4.upc.edu I have sent you a private email about your login details. > What's the next step? I send

Re: [sage-devel] Sage mini-manual in Catalan

2012-04-16 Thread Minh Nguyen
Dear Maria, I apologize for the very late reply. On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Maria Bras Amoros wrote: > I contacted Jordi Guardia (cc: guar...@ma4.upc.edu), from Universitat > Politècnica de Catalunya, for refereeing my mini sage manual in Catalan. > Should he contact directly you? There's

[sage-devel] a modest proposal: spooning

2012-03-31 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, It is a fact universally acknowledged that an open source developer with an idea is in need of a way to effectively implement the idea. Distributed version control systems such as Mercurial, Git, etc. form the early stage in the evolution of processes of software development. The major

Re: [sage-devel] Sage mini-manual in Catalan

2012-03-05 Thread Minh Nguyen
Dear Maria, On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Maria Bras Amoros wrote: > I contacted Jordi Guàrdia from UPC (Technical University of Catalonia) for > the review. What kind of review do you need? Is it more a tecnical review or > a linguistics review? Maybe I should clarify why your document would

Re: [sage-devel] Add extra memory to pdflatex (#12572) needs review

2012-03-03 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > In order to build the new PDF reference manual after #9128, LaTeX needs > more memory than the default.  Adding the environment variable > extra_mem_top=200 > to (pdf)latex makes the manual compile again. > > Please review: > http://trac

Re: [sage-devel] Sage mini-manual in Catalan

2012-02-27 Thread Minh Nguyen
Dear Maria, On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:52 AM, David Joyner wrote: > Attached is a Sage mini-manual in Catalan written by Prof Amoros > in Spain. Can it be posted to > http://www.sagemath.org/help.html#SageStandardDoc ? > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Maria Bras Amoros > Date

[sage-devel] Re: Re: A_tour_of_sage_Zh

2012-02-21 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:56 PM, 廖祥 wrote: > Thanks to reply my message , and your constructive advises . I just have > modified the document according to your suggestions , now this .rar file > include the LaTeX source . > In fact , if my translation can be release with Sage Official Doc ,

Re: [sage-devel] git

2012-02-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi William, On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:21 AM, William Stein wrote: > I want to switch to using git to develop the core Sage library (though > I'll still submit patches using hg for now). > How can I do this? To preserve the commit history under Mercurial, we need to convert from hg to git format.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: consolidating installation instructions

2012-02-17 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Kelvin, On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Kelvin Li wrote: > How about merging the wiki into the Installation Guide and stripping > down README.txt to contain minimal installation instructions? The > parts of README.txt that I consider non-critical are: > > * section "Implementation" ("Sage ha

Re: [sage-devel] consolidating installation instructions

2012-02-17 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Kelvin, On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Kelvin Li wrote: > Should the following resources be consolidated? > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadGuide > http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadAndInstallationGuide > http://boxen.math.washington.edu/sage/src/README.txt > http://sagemath.org/doc/instal

Re: [sage-devel] hg.sagemath.org, examples repo

2012-02-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Keshav, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: > Thanks for the fix! If you can somehow give me read access to > /home/sagemath/wiki on boxen I can take a look at the script. Here's the script to start up hg.sagemath.org, i.e. a web interface to Mercurial repositories: http://s

Re: [sage-devel] hg.sagemath.org, examples repo

2012-02-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi William, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: >> Can whoever has control over hg.sagemath.org please add the base repo there? > > Done. See > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/sagemath/wiki

Re: [sage-devel] hg.sagemath.org, examples repo

2012-02-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Keshav, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Keshav Kini wrote: > Can whoever has control over hg.sagemath.org please add the base repo there? Done. See http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/sagemath/wiki/sage-hg/hg/sage-root/ But note that I do not know how to update the site hg.sagemath.org t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Funding for you to come work on Sage

2012-02-10 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, David Roe wrote: > We're especially looking for people for Review Days and Doc Days. If you're > excited about incorporating the patchbot into Sage and making it easier for > people to contribute code to Sage you should come to Review Days! And if > y

Re: [sage-devel] GSOC 2012

2012-02-08 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Martin, On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > c) M1RI, that's the code Tom wrote for dense linear algebra over GF(3) - > GF(7). As far as I understand it, it's a bunch of Sage worksheets at the > moment, i.e. a proof of concept. Where are these Sage worksheets? -- Regards

Re: [sage-devel] Problem with the patchbot?

2012-01-30 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Kwankyu, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > src/convert.c:56: fatal error: error closing /tmp/ccj9Gz6N.s: No space left > on device > compilation terminated. > scons: *** [src/convert.os] Error 1 > ERROR: There was an error building c_lib. > ... > > This does not seem a faul

Re: [sage-devel] add a graph for US states?

2012-01-16 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Dan, On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dan Drake wrote: > We'd probably want several graphs -- all 50 states, continental US, > with/without Washington DC. I don't know what good names for them would > be or how to put them into the (already huge) graphs.* namespace. > > Thoughts? Ideas? * gra

Re: [sage-devel] Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-05 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jeroen, On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > For those running Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot): > > Please test sage-4.8.alpha6: > http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.8.alpha6/sage-4.8.alpha6.tar > > In some cases, R is known to fail to build because of a read

Re: [sage-devel] marketing signs, posters, etc.

2011-09-29 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jason, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jason/marketing/letter-size-sage-expanded-poster.pdf Within the cell "Share. Embed.", here's a change suggestion: "Embed plots, calcuations," --> "Embed plots, calculations," -- Regards Minh

Re: [sage-devel] "sage:" documentation strings

2011-09-14 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Pedro, On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Pedro Cruz wrote: > I've search here > > http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html#documentation-strings > > looking for this type of docstring: > > """ >sage: txt=r''' hello >: this goes on ''' > """ > > This does not work using

Re: [sage-devel] Trac milestone bumping

2011-08-16 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jeroen, On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > I have "completed" milestone sage-4.7.1 on Trac but now all existing > tickets still refer to sage-4.7.1, this should be changed to sage-4.7.2. I just bumped all (or at least I think I have done so) tickets to milestone 4.7.2. P

Re: [sage-devel] thematic tutorials

2011-08-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:35 AM, davidp wrote: > I think it should be easier to find the Thematic Tutorials (http:// > sagemath.org/doc/thematic_tutorials/). I only learned about these > tutorials by accident using Google. > > In fact, now that I look more closely at the Documentation

Re: [sage-devel] Graph Theory Quick Reference

2011-07-28 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Rafael, On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Rafael T wrote: > I am not sure if this is right place for this. This is a good place for discussing about documentation. > I wrote a quick > reference for graph theory and I was wondering if you could take a > look at it and perhaps suggest some ite

Re: [sage-devel] Sage download page

2011-07-22 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Eviatar, On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Eviatar wrote: > I notice that the download link on the main page links to the Linux > download page, with a link to other systems in a small font. Wouldn't > it be better for it to link to http://sagemath.org/download.html, > which includes downloads

Re: [sage-devel] How about a GitHub mirror?

2011-07-22 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Andrei, On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Andrei wrote: > You probably know that GitHub is extremely popular hosting for open-source > projects (https://github.com/about). I think it would be very beneficial for > SAGE to be mirrored to GitHub as well. You are more than welcome to mirror Sage

Re: [sage-devel] Lifts

2011-07-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Rob, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Rob Beezer wrote: > What does the term "lift" meant to you, at least in an algebraic > structure setting? To me it suggests new mappings involving super- > structures, which might agree with old mappings between substructures > (or the application of said

[sage-devel] Re: Quasigroup Cryptography source codes

2011-07-04 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:15 AM, richard ouseph wrote: > Respected Sir, > I am attaching with this the source code of our work in c,as of now it takes > any message string and key length of any size provided that it falls within > the range of the order of quasigroup. You should contact the s

[sage-devel] Re: Implementation of Quasigroup cryptography in SAGE

2011-07-04 Thread Minh Nguyen
t help! Before the misunderstanding you have in mind is cleared up, it's good to not be sarcastic and bitter with myself or the whole Sage community in general. > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote: >> >> Hi Richard, >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:21

[sage-devel] Fwd: [sage-trac-account] El Gamal

2011-07-03 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, I'm forwarding the message below to sage-devel where more people can join in the discussion. -- Forwarded message -- From: charls mathew Date: Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM Subject: Re: [sage-trac-account] To: sage-trac-account I have an Elgamal Algorithm implementation ba

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-trac-account]

2011-07-03 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:01 PM, tevin joseph wrote: > I have a Diffie-Hellman key exchange implementation based on the > "Applied Cryptography" by Bruce Schneier. It works well in version > 4.6.2 Cool! You are more than welcome to upload a patch to the Sage trac server. -- Regards Minh Va

Re: [sage-devel] Sage-4.7 CDROM

2011-06-27 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:13 PM, cch wrote: > Live Sage CDROM-4.7 are released, both for x32 and x64 intel-based PC. > they are hosted on Porteus Linux (Slakware-13.37 clone) and other > info: Thanks for this. The live CD is now advertised on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sage-M

[sage-devel] Re: bugfix for scons 1.2.0

2011-06-22 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, Someone sent the message below to me off-list. Regards Minh Van Nguyen Dear all I hit an error when building sage 4.7.0 on mac os x server 10.6.7 (on a mac= mini, running in 64-bit kernel mode). I tried to build the package in a su= bfolder of /Library. This specific location trigg

Re: [sage-devel] Index of functions and procedures on the documentation

2011-06-15 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:05 PM, mmarco wrote: > Talking with some coleague he told be that he thought that sage > documentation was very bad. The reason he presented was that it was > very difficult to find if some function or procedure was implemented. What about searching the reference

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Translation

2011-06-14 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Ege, On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Ege Sertçetin wrote: > I now translated it. Cool! > Does the person I will show it have to be a > developer of Sage? Preferably, but not strictly required to be a current Sage developer. You should open a trac ticket, post your translation to that tic

Re: [sage-devel] Translation

2011-06-14 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Ege Sertçetin wrote: > Also I can find one or two person to help translating. But > I don't know where to start. As a first step, you could try translating the document "A Tour of Sage" [1]. It's short and would require less work to translate than the Sage tu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: PDF documentation errors/warnings

2011-06-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Karl, On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:48 PM, kcrisman wrote: > Also, can anyone explain why the Spanish doc is only in pdf, not html, > at http://sagemath.org/help.html#SageStandardDoc ? Because there is no Sphinxified version of those documentation. The author(s) only provided the PDF version. --

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Advertising Sage development versions on the website

2011-06-10 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Niles, On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Niles wrote: > Thanks; I just tried it out. Here are some minor comments: > > * The phrase "bleeding edge" still appears in the download directory > [1], and also in the readme file. > > * The large warning says the directory contains "builds", which lea

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Advertising Sage development versions on the website

2011-06-09 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jason, On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > Perhaps: "unstable" or "nightly" or "latest alpha", or even "cutting edge". > The warning could still be big and bold (like it should be!). I have chosen "Development Release". Please test it out to see how usable it is. -- Regar

Re: [sage-devel] Advertising Sage development versions on the website

2011-06-09 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Please see > > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html > > which is linked from > > http://www.sagemath.org/download.html#DevelRelease On second thought, the page http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html i

Re: [sage-devel] Advertising Sage development versions on the website

2011-06-09 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jeroen, On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Would it be possible to make a page analogous to > http://www.sagemath.org/download-source.html > but for the development version? That's a very sensible idea. Please see http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html which is li

Re: [sage-devel] Advertising Sage development versions on the website

2011-06-09 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jeroen, On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > The last development version of Sage is always mirrored, see for example > http://boxen.math.washington.edu/sage/devel/ > > However, this doesn't seem to be advertised anywhere. I think the page > http://boxen.math.washington.edu

Re: [sage-devel] how are you?

2011-05-25 Thread Minh Nguyen
This is spam. I've removed it from the list. Sorry, folks. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://gro

Re: [sage-devel] can someone remove the optional GPLK package ?

2011-04-25 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, The package glpk-4.42.p0 has been removed from http://www.sagemath.org/packages/optional/. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For m

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Short trac maintainence downtime april 22nd from 14:00 GMT

2011-04-22 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Maarten, On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Maarten Derickx wrote: > And now I want to modify the > developers guide but I don't have a clue about where the sources are > which I have to edit. Of course the part > http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/trac.html#closing-tickets > should reflect t

[sage-devel] trac account managers wanted

2011-04-15 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, As you know, the Google group sage-trac-account [1] was recently created in order to better manage the creation of new accounts and manage existing ones (and slow down spams). If users are to get their trac accounts in a timely manner, we need a dedicated group of volunteer account manag

Re: [sage-devel] new group sage-trac-account for managing trac accounts

2011-04-15 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > What checks do you suggest the trac account managers do? That is quite a > critical point, as otherwise it would be very easy to spam if no checks were > made. It would be even easier to spam using some automated registration

[sage-devel] new group sage-trac-account for managing trac accounts

2011-04-15 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, Following a recent discussion on sage-devel [1], I've created a new Google Group called "sage-trac-account" at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac-account The purpose of this group is to manage the accout system on the Sage trac at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ The idea i

Re: [sage-devel] Re: spam trac tickets: 11171 and others

2011-04-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Rob, On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Rob Beezer wrote: > Might this be a good time to suggest a person's Trac username be > identical to their Google Groups username and/or their email username? Yes. When mabshoff was managing trac accounts, one rule was: No leet handles. The welcome email c

Re: [sage-devel] Re: spam trac tickets: 11171 and others

2011-04-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi John, On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:37 PM, John Cremona wrote: > This looks very like the authentication needed for someone to join a > google group such as sage-nt (I get an email when anyone asks to join > and have to make a decision). Exactly. A group of managers/moderators screen requests for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: spam trac tickets: 11171 and others

2011-04-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Dan, On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Dan Drake wrote: > I'm almost certainly overthinking this, but: we have people making > requests (for trac accounts) and a group of people who can fulfill the > requests. OK. First gather a support base of people who are willing to volunteer as account ma

Re: [sage-devel] Re: spam trac tickets: 11171 and others

2011-04-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi kcrisman, On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:27 AM, kcrisman wrote: > We need to implement something, stat. #11191 and #11192 (both within > the last hour) are spam. Solution: Remove the current captcha plugin. It's trivially broken with a human spammer creating spam accounts. Have a group of people

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] sage-4.7.alpha3 released

2011-04-02 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > Agreed, though that is obvious from the release schedule. But may not be obvious from the standard documentation that one reads. How many and which type of people actually closely follow the release schedule? > So does this m

Re: [sage-devel] Spam tickets on Trac

2011-04-01 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi William, On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 3:07 AM, William Stein wrote: > It sounds like it might be less work for you if we switch to "email > Minh for an account"? I can't say it would be less work for me. I check trac very often for over two years now. Creating trac accounts even on a daily basis wo

Re: [sage-devel] Spam tickets on Trac

2011-03-31 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:20 PM, kcrisman wrote: > See (or don't) #11102 and #11103. Now they're creating new tickets, > not just comments. Hopefully someone can get rid of them. They're closed as invalid and the corresponding accounts deleted. > But it > would be bad to go back to the "email

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-edu] Re: Two upcoming Sage webinars

2011-03-25 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Karl-Dieter, On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:24 AM, kcrisman wrote: > First one is now available at > http://www.mosaic-web.org/MCAST/videos/MCAST-2011-03-18/index.htm > > Harald or Minh, can you put this up on one of the video link sites? Done. See http://www.sagemath.org/help-video.html > Dav

Re: [sage-devel] Java study material and top interview guide

2011-03-16 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:43 PM, David Kirkby wrote: > I think the only sensible option is to set up the lists such that new > members posts get moderated. That's easy to do in Google groups. Here's how I moderate each new request for joining a Sage mailing list. When I get to the mode

Re: [sage-devel] Documentation indicates PDFs even if they are not made.

2011-02-21 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > That patch would seem sensible to me, See ticket #10811 for an updated Makefile: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10811 > as long as building the pdf docs > remade the HTML files with the links in. Here is what I u

Re: [sage-devel] Documentation indicates PDFs even if they are not made.

2011-02-19 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:06 AM, David Kirkby wrote: > I was wondering if it would be possible to have a default PDF file, > which indicated what were the necessary steps to generate the real PDF > files. By default I build the HTML documentation without generating the links to the PDF

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Days 30

2011-02-11 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Hugh, On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, hugh thomas wrote: > Is it okay to go ahead and create > a page on the Sage wiki? (I guess the answers are yes and yes; if > not, please let me know!) When you have the URL of the wiki page for Sage Days 30, please announce it in this list. -- Regards

[sage-devel] anthropological analysis of Fedora's online development community

2011-02-02 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi folks, The following blog post contains a distillation of a Master's student's anthropological research on the Fedora online development community: http://www.cyber-anthro.com/beta-an-exploration-of-fedora%E2%80%99s-online-open-source-development-community/ There are numerous points in there

Re: [sage-devel] post more

2011-01-28 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi William, On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 4:31 PM, William Stein wrote: > If every person reading responded with a paragraph about what they've > been up to related to sage this month, then maybe we could get to 1000 > messages by the end of the month! I've been documenting some graph algorithms used

Re: [sage-devel] Uploading binary distributions

2011-01-24 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Mike wrote: > I have recently compiled sage-4.6.1 for opensuse 11.3 (see below for > details). I would be happy to upload the resulting binary > distribution, but have not been able to find either instructions on > how to do this or an admonition that such co

Re: [sage-devel] Upgrade sphinx to 1.0.6

2011-01-13 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi David, On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:53 PM, D. Monarres wrote: > Hello all, > > On a lark (and a tip from sphinx-dev) that upgrading sphinx would > solve some of my intersphinx cross-reference issue I have created an > spkg (and a patch to sage_autodoc) that upgrade sphinx from 0.6.3 to > 1.0.6,

[sage-devel] one level for TOC of reference manual, instead of two

2011-01-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Kwankyu, On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > I like the new approach. In the same vein, the Contents page may be > restructured such that it lists only chapter titles, and each chaper > has its own contents page. The current Contents page is too long to > scroll down to reac

Re: [sage-devel] Reference Style for Documentation?

2011-01-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Eviatar, On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Eviatar wrote: > Hello, > > I think there should be a consistent reference style throughout the > Sage documentation; there doesn't seem to be one now. AMS seems > appropriate, http://tinyurl.com/2dknqzh. What do you think? This is a good idea and can

Re: [sage-devel] Modelica within SAGE

2011-01-12 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:07 PM, peb wrote: > Hello all, > > do you have any plan to include Modelica (OpenModelica or JModelica) > within SAGE? If you want to include any software with Sage, you can package it yourself or get someone interested to do the packaging. See ticket #10110 [1] fo

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >