Hi Kwankyu, On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Kwankyu Lee <ekwan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like the new approach. In the same vein, the Contents page may be > restructured such that it lists only chapter titles, and each chaper > has its own contents page. The current Contents page is too long to > scroll down to reach what I want.
That seems very logical to me. The problem with the current listing in the table of content (TOC) is that it would get longer as more modules are listed. As there are more modules (i.e. Python and Cython files) than top-level directories for organizing them, a TOC that is more than 1 level deep is just one way to exacerbate the problem of long TOC's. Moving the TOC to use 1-level deep is something others might not agree with. If anyone is against using 1 level for the TOC of the reference manual, speak up now and provide your reasons. Otherwise after some time I would open a ticket to implement the suggestion above. -- Regards Minh Van Nguyen -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
