2009/6/27 Dr. David Kirkby :
>
> John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 27, 6:50 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
>> wrote:
#!/usr/bin/bash
if [ `uname` = "SunOS" -a "`ld --version 2>&1 | grep GNU`" = "" ]; then
echo "Solaris system. The linker is NOT the GNU linker"
echo "The
2009/6/26 kcrisman :
>
> On Jun 26, 2:24 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>> On Jun 26, 10:33 am, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> > > > I'm really sorry this is so weird. This is OSX.4 on a PPC, so perhaps
>> > > > something got changed in those scripts recently?
>>
>> > > Yes, it got changed in #5806. Can you
2009/4/7 Brian Granger :
>
>> That seems awfully complicated. How about (untested):
>>
>> sage_python = python
>> from sympy import *
>> python = sage_python
>>
>> or (even shorter, and still untested):
>>
>> from sympy import *
>> restore('python')
>
> Sure these may work, but in my mind they ar
Some code that used to work in sage-3.0.6 (or something close like
3.0.3), now break with this error message:
>>> R. = PolynomialRing(RR, 3)
>>> solve([symbolic_expression(x0) == 0], x0, x1, x2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/Users/anakha/.sage/sage_notebook/wo
2009/3/25 bourbabis :
>
> Hi SAGE teamT.
>
> So I've tried to rebuild from scratch.
> I've encountered several times this error message :
>
> python: can't open file '/opt/sage-3.4/devel/sage/doc/common/
> builder.py'
> (See lines number 31833 and 68522 from the log file).
>
> Notice I've been abl
2009/3/24 William Stein :
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:02 AM, bourbabis wrote:
>>
>> Hello SAGE people.
>>
>> Everything is in the title. Several attempts with "make" leading to
>> the exact same point of failure.
>>
>> The install log file :
>> http://download206.mediafire.com/nzjxxh0x9jmg/4lj
2009/3/4 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Mar 4, 2:48 pm, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
>> This does not build on Mac OS X 10.5.6 PPC 64-bits. It does build
>> fine in 32-bit mode though
>>
>> The first issue is rather trivial. The gmp-mpir-0.9 spkg
2009/3/4 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Mar 4, 2:59 pm, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
>> > I tried adding -mlongcall to the gcc options without success.
>>
>> Yeah, I also found this
>> pagehttp://lists.apple.com/archives/carbon-dev/2007/aug/msg00154.html
>> - for now you might just want to remov
This does not build on Mac OS X 10.5.6 PPC 64-bits. It does build
fine in 32-bit mode though
The first issue is rather trivial. The gmp-mpir-0.9 spkg fails to
build because spkg-install passes the option ABI=64 while it expects
ABI=mode64.
After a manual fix, the build goes on until symmetrica
Recently I made a patch to improve the handling of colormap, which has
been merged in 3.3 (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4884)
There was some discussion on the ticket (read the comments) which may
have confused everybody.
I proposed adding a function to the global namespace called
cm
>>> >* dvipng-1.8 -- available on any linux/os x system via standard
>>> > package tools; has nothing to do with sage
>>>
>>> Delete it completely. The dependencies are insane and people just
>>> install the distributions version..
I think this spkg was made for macs, where the system dvipng
2008/10/22 Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> David Joyner wrote:
>> I'll have to wait until I get home from work to test it out but the
>> patch looks like you've added a lot of nice functionality. My original
>> thought was
>> to include more of the legend options in the method itself (instead
Though I haven't put
much though into what happens when you add two Graphics with a legend
together.
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Arnaud Bergeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I implemented some code to put legends on 2d plots.
>>
>> It currently works, b
I implemented some code to put legends on 2d plots.
It currently works, but I would like comments on the interface or
better ways to do some things before I put the code up for review in
trac.
I am aware that the code needs proper documentation, I'll do that tomorrow.
Also, should I put a deprec
into another
> merged patch. Can you review it?
>
> Cheers,
> Marshall
>
>> On Oct 4, 7:59 pm, "Arnaud Bergeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > 2008/9/29 mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> > > I thought I would explici
2008/9/29 mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I thought I would explicitly point this one out because I had been
> reviewing #4164 (work by Arnaud Bergeron), but now I am also
> contributing code and I think the best scenario is to have someone
> else take a look. Mike
ut
110ms and the two others take about 200ms (not including the time it
takes to build the polyhedron).
Please review again.
Arnaud
> Cheers,
> Marshall Hampton
>
> On Sep 23, 1:01 am, "Arnaud Bergeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My code is up for
My code is up for review at #4164
Arnaud
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sag
2008/9/20 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> On Sep 20, 9:24 am, "Arnaud Bergeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
>> I am mentioned as having done my first contribution for 3.1.2, but in
>> the 3.1.1 release notes,
>
> I
tually look at the points themselves, only at their adjacency (with
vertex_adjacencies())
> Cheers,
> Marshall
>
> On Sep 20, 3:08 pm, "Arnaud Bergeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> About this, I have encountered behaviour which I find strange (and
>> also brea
Cheers,
> Marshall Hampton
>
> On Sep 20, 11:35 am, "Arnaud Bergeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/9/20 mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hi everybody,
>>
>> > This is mainly about making
2008/9/20 mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> This is mainly about making the lrs optional package standard to
> improve some polytope-related calculations.
>
> My original motivation for lrs (linear reverse search) is that is a
> very different algorithm/implementation for computi
2008/9/19 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.1.1/Sage-3.1.1-release-notes-draft1.txt
>
> and
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.1.2/Sage-3.1.2-release-notes-draft1.txt
>
> you can
2008/9/18 Pavel Panchekha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> """
> For clarification, are you asking for a way to have a base tag with
> your url(s) on every notebook page and that's all we need for url
> prefixes?
> """
>
> Yes. In the head of every page, include a tag, such as:
>
>
> Then, each of the l
e
make in the path. That way it would be possible tu use gmake by just
typing 'gmake' instead of 'make' on BSD systems. Of course, if Sage
never intends to go that way, then there is no benefit.
>> John Cremona
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>> CC: sage-dev
libm4ri does not build on OS X 10.5 ppc
See
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4059
for details.
I can do the OS X ppc part, (and even then it would need testing on
10.4 and G4s), but I have no idea about Solaris on Sparcs.
I should build alphas more often.
--~--~-~--~~-
hg diff in spkg/base gives the diff at the bottom in a just-extracted
sage-3.1.2.alpha4. Should this repository be ignored or is this just
an oversight?
diff -r 743c463b3af6 sage-env
--- a/sage-env Sun May 18 17:08:31 2008 -0700
+++ b/sage-env Wed Sep 03 13:43:21 2008 -0400
@@ -148,8 +148,10 @
2008/8/28 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks for tracking this down. Please open a new ticket and attach the
> patch to it.
>
> We generally attempt to avoid reopening tickets or adding patches to
> tickets that were closed in previous milestones since that makes
> reconstructing the exact s
2008/8/28 Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
>> There is a strong possibility that for the next semester I will be
>> working on the graphics area of sage. I would working more on the
>> visible side than the innards but that does not mean I
ppm?).
>> It would be nice to have those working better.
Do you mean texture for object? If yes, I can do that too. It might
need some hacking in tachyon itself, but I'm not against that.
> That's a great suggestion. Can jmol also do image texture maps?
>
>>
>> Hmmm...I kn
2008/8/27 John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Two build reports. Both built fine, but a few doctest failures:
>
> 1. Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
> 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 23:41:49 UTC 2008
>
> The following tests failed:
>
>
There is a strong possibility that for the next semester I will be
working on the graphics area of sage. I would working more on the
visible side than the innards but that does not mean I will not touch
the innards if need be.
Currently I have these items that I think need work / I would like to
2008/8/23 Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 8:58 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> If it is about plot_division and plot_points, then yes, it will be garbage
>> in a f
2008/8/23 Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi group,
>
> i'am a little bit confused while analysing Sage Python packages and
> (newbie's default) a would like to ask a simple question :
For the next time, this sort of question goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> when one types
>
> var('x')
> f_ex
>> > data /. x_?(# < 0 &) -> 0 (this is perhaps not the killer example)
>>
>> What does that do?
>
> /. is the pattern replacement operator, _ is a placeholder pattern
> that matches anything, x_ gives this placeholder a name so you can use
> it later, ? filters the matches (in this case, everythi
2008/7/18 Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Just for the record, __nonzero__ is a Python special method, nothing
> to do with Parents/Elements.
What it has to do with Elements is that the current Element class
implements it. Nothing else.
>>> But I think this discussion does bring up the
2008/7/17 Kurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Jul 16, 2:39 pm, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > I have a class which represents the set of words over an alphabet (but
>> > is not a Monoïd since it also contains infinite words) and another
>> > class which represents a word. These class
2008/7/16 Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
>>On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Arnaud Bergeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation
>> of words in sage (which is much more powerf
I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation
of words in sage (which is much more powerful than what is already
there). You can find our current code at
http://sage-words.googlecode.com/ if you are interested.
We started out using as little as possible from the Sage libra
2008/6/24 didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Michael Abshoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am not sure if there is any harm if Maxima builds it. When woulds building
>> xmaxima cause a problem?
>
> I'm sure it doesn't; the issue is that sage builds somet
40 matches
Mail list logo
