[sage-devel] Re: Evaluating algebraic polynomials on symbolic expressions

Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > Currently, evaluating a polynomial ring element on a symbolic > expression returns a result in Horner form: > > sage: pol = QQ['x'](range(10)) > sage: pol(x) > 9*x + 8)*x + 7)*x + 6)*x + 5)*x + 4)*x + 3)*x + 2)*x + 1)*x http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18282 (need

[sage-devel] Re: Issues with GCC 5.x

leif wrote: > * Sage library -- modules using Lcalc headers won't build for the >same reason (build with '-fpermissive' in >CFLAGS; distutils ignores CXXFLAGS) > sage/libs/coxeter3 also fails: In file included from /usr/include/coxeter/coxgroup.h:67:0,

[sage-devel] Re: asymptotic forms of specialized functions available for symbolic computation

What do you mean by "available" ? You could presumably type them in as formulas. My browser doesn't show anything in the inline image. Numerical evaluation of (for example) Bessel functions are generally done by algorithms based on asymptotic formulas. (e.g. in Maxima) RJF On Friday, April 24,

[sage-devel] Re: Trac and sort by lastmod

kcrisman wrote: > > > After clicking Lastmod-header it got tickets sorted like > > > > 1 mins < 23 hours < 32 mins < 8 days > > It's not a direct answer to your question, but you might be interested > in http://trac.sagemath.org/report/92 >

[sage-devel] Re: Trac and sort by lastmod

Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2014-09-26 14:50, kcrisman wrote: >> I wish I could! I recall that Jeroen had to always ask someone else to >> change the milestone, even he didn't have access to it as release >> manager :) > Nobody ever told me how it was done, but I assume it was indeed a direct > man

[sage-devel] Re: Trac and sort by lastmod

Volker Braun wrote: > Though I agree that we don't really need to update the milestone, (not me) > if its > pointing at an older version then so what? Is anybody making trac > queries for specific milestones? YEEES! (Ja, ja, "too late to the party...") -leif -- You received this m

Re: [sage-devel] Non-Sage C code in the Sage library

On Friday, 24 April 2015 14:27:53 UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: > > On 24 April 2015 at 10:32, tha...@debian.org < > tha...@debian.org > wrote: > > Whether it is an embedded fork in sage or it gets its own git repo on > the > > sage github account.. Someone from the sage community would have to

Re: [sage-devel] Can't build Sage with 2GB RAM anymore

Upstream Cython has now fixed this and I made a new Cython package for Sage with this patch. Please review http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18294 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em

Re: [sage-devel] Can't build Sage with 2GB RAM anymore

Sage ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18294 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,

[sage-devel] Re: User imports wrong twisted

On 04/24/2015 02:02 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote: > On 24 April 2015 at 14:43, Marc Mezzarobba > wrote: > > Jan Groenewald wrote: > > I a computer lab environment, with identical desktop images (PPA, > > Ubuntu 14.04, 64bit) all except one user can launch the n

Re: [sage-devel] Non-Sage C code in the Sage library

On 24 April 2015 at 10:32, than...@debian.org wrote: > Whether it is an embedded fork in sage or it gets its own git repo on the > sage github account.. Someone from the sage community would have to fix bugs > in both cases. Yes! But I think that David Harvey *is* a member of the Sage community

[sage-devel] Random matrices that already are there

For some time I wonder how to generate random matrices of Zmod(n). But Sage already have them: G = GL(3,Zmod(4)); G.random_element() So Matrix.random() may (at least in some situations) just use this. A question: Where is the documentation and/or source code for this? I would like to know how

Re: [sage-devel] Re: User imports wrong twisted

Hi On 24 April 2015 at 14:43, Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > Jan Groenewald wrote: > > I a computer lab environment, with identical desktop images (PPA, > > Ubuntu 14.04, 64bit) all except one user can launch the notebook fine. > > > > For some reason, that user is importing the system-wide twisted an

[sage-devel] Re: User imports wrong twisted

Jan Groenewald wrote: > I a computer lab environment, with identical desktop images (PPA, > Ubuntu 14.04, 64bit) all except one user can launch the notebook fine. > > For some reason, that user is importing the system-wide twisted and > not the sage twisted. A wild guess: does the user have .pth

[sage-devel] User imports wrong twisted

Hi I a computer lab environment, with identical desktop images (PPA, Ubuntu 14.04, 64bit) all except one user can launch the notebook fine. For some reason, that user is importing the system-wide twisted and not the sage twisted. banele@bamako:~$ sage -q sage: import twisted; twisted sage: So

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Re: hosting the sage cell server

Hallo Karl-Dieter, maybe I forgot to tell some details about the offer. I just sent Andrey an email containing some technical stuff (hosting and login details), but I would like to send some lines to the mailing lists considering our institute. Namely, I am a theoretical physicist at Goethe Unive

[sage-devel] asymptotic forms of specialized functions available for symbolic computation

> > I am curious about the possibly of having asymptotic forms of specialized > functions available for symbolic computation. > > For instance, small or large argument approximations of Hankel functions > can be quite useful for symbolic manipulation [see below]. Is there a > convenient w

Re: [sage-devel] Non-Sage C code in the Sage library

Whether it is an embedded fork in sage or it gets its own git repo on the sage github account.. Someone from the sage community would have to fix bugs in both cases. Am Freitag, 24. April 2015 10:37:56 UTC+2 schrieb John Cremona: > > Who is the author of hyperellfrob? > > There is a point in ad

Re: [sage-devel] Non-Sage C code in the Sage library

On 2015-04-24 11:08, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: There is even a makefile included A Makefile is not nearly close to a decent build system. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro

Re: [sage-devel] Non-Sage C code in the Sage library

On Friday, April 24, 2015 at 10:42:12 AM UTC+2, John Cremona wrote: > > On 24 April 2015 at 09:37, John Cremona > > wrote: > > Who is the author of hyperellfrob? > > OK, I found it (it is actually called hypellfrob): David Harvey. > David, if you are listening -- any comments? > And availabl

Re: [sage-devel] Non-Sage C code in the Sage library

On 24 April 2015 at 09:37, John Cremona wrote: > Who is the author of hyperellfrob? OK, I found it (it is actually called hypellfrob): David Harvey. David, if you are listening -- any comments? John > > There is a point in addition to Michael's: maintaining a fork which > only differs with re

Re: [sage-devel] Non-Sage C code in the Sage library

Who is the author of hyperellfrob? There is a point in addition to Michael's: maintaining a fork which only differs with respect to libtools packaging is one thing, but we would also need someone to take responsibility for any bugs found in the code, if the original author was not able, willing