Re: [sage-devel] Build error in Sage-6.2: pynac-0.3.2

>From your logs it seems to be a permission problem. What user own /opt/sage-6.2 ? and what are the permissions ? 2014-06-07 3:15 UTC+02:00, Alasdair : > Here's the error as reported during the compilation process: > > checking for python... /opt/sage-6.2/local/bin/python >> checking for a version

Re: [sage-devel] Logs for aleph.sagemath.org

On Jun 6, 2014, at 7:11 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 6/5/14, 2:33, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> Are there logs (and if so where are they?) for aleph.sagemath.org? I'm >> trying to figure out what sorts of things the iOS app is used for. > > Yes, there are logs. Right now, we log remote ip, referer,

[sage-devel] Build error in Sage-6.2: pynac-0.3.2

Here's the error as reported during the compilation process: checking for python... /opt/sage-6.2/local/bin/python > checking for a version of Python >= '2.1.0'... sys:1: RuntimeWarning: not > adding directory '' to sys.path since it's writable by an untrusted group. > Untrusted users could put f

Re: [sage-devel] Re: cached_function: a filter to only cache some inputs ?

> > Note that I would also need to triple MANY functions in the graph code, > for the very reason that you insist on writing Python code as if it were C > code. > > Interesting, there are things like that in the optimization-based graph code too? > I have been doing this in the Graph code fo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: cached_function: a filter to only cache some inputs ?

On Friday, June 6, 2014 6:35:01 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: > > Nevertheless, there is an intermediate solution which I proposed > recently in #16347 comment:12. Let me repeat it here. Instead of > returning an OA or a boolean we can write a function > "orthogonal_array_construction(k, n)" whose

[sage-devel] Re: Error Building sage-6.2: Error installing package atlas-3.10.1.20140210

Try the latest beta (see also #16345) On Friday, June 6, 2014 3:20:41 AM UTC+1, nat wrote: > > I was trying to build sage on the new Samsung Chromebook 2. I am using > crouton with Ubuntu 12.04. I tried to build Sage in the home folder of my > chroot(?). I attached the log file described below

Re: [sage-devel] Re: cached_function: a filter to only cache some inputs ?

Hello, I think that I was the main reviewer of the module on orthogonal_array, so I take part in responsability! But on the other hand I know the code quite well and can answer to some of the design decisions. It is still largely possible to refactor the code, especially the functions that are av

[sage-devel] Error Building sage-6.2: Error installing package atlas-3.10.1.20140210

I was trying to build sage on the new Samsung Chromebook 2. I am using crouton with Ubuntu 12.04. I tried to build Sage in the home folder of my chroot(?). I attached the log file described below: Error installing package

Re: [sage-devel] Re: cached_function: a filter to only cache some inputs ?

Okay, I'm tired of this. As soon as all the current patches are reviewed I will turn all this code into socially acceptable Object-Oriented crap. It will be bad work, bad decisions taken for bad reasons, but this will let me add actual mathematical code to Sage later on while I cannot do this if e

Re: [sage-devel] Re: cached_function: a filter to only cache some inputs ?

> This is something fixable. We deal with this in plotting and symbolics all > the time. Naming things twice (esp. since orthogonal_array isn't in the > global namespace, just designs.[tab]) seems very reasonable to me. > > designs.orthogonal_array_maximum_size > designs.orthogonal_array_existenc

Re: [sage-devel] Re: cached_function: a filter to only cache some inputs ?

I didn't watch this thread before, but now I'm sorry I didn't. > > If > > designs.orthogonal_array doesn't return some kind of array then it is > poorly > > named. Use three different functions, e.g. orthogonal_array() / > > is_constructible() / size_of_array() > > > > This basic design pattern

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Recommendations for a new Parent/Element pair

2014-06-06 17:12 UTC+02:00, Travis Scrimshaw : > I don't think there's much documentation beyond what's in > _coerce_map_from_() in Parent. > > If it returns re, then it uses _element_constructor_ to construct the > morphism. Otherwise you return a morphism. I think there's some examples in > > src

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Recommendations for a new Parent/Element pair

I don't think there's much documentation beyond what's in _coerce_map_from_() in Parent. If it returns re, then it uses _element_constructor_ to construct the morphism. Otherwise you return a morphism. I think there's some examples in src/algebras which returns morphisms (I'm pretty sure I've s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Seattle Questions

On Jun 6, 2014 1:59 AM, "Martin Albrecht" wrote: > > On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 20:58:55 you wrote: > > Do I need to book a hotel or can we stay at the house? > > You will need to book a hotel room, see: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bugdays/FhB7gi1JY80 > > You should also subscribe t

[sage-devel] Please review symbolic integration tickets

Hello, These tickets fix some long-standing problems with integration. http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/8734 http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16007 Please review. Regards, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this g

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

> I did already. Not every review is to the positive %-) This is not a review, this is trolling. Come on guy, the feature can be useful ! Don't kill it because of something else which is already done anyway ! Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

On Friday, June 6, 2014 1:44:13 PM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > P.S. : Still not feeling like reviewing #16353 ? :-PPP > I did already. Not every review is to the positive %-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe fro

[sage-devel] Re: Logs for aleph.sagemath.org

On 6/5/14, 2:33, Ivan Andrus wrote: Are there logs (and if so where are they?) for aleph.sagemath.org? I'm trying to figure out what sorts of things the iOS app is used for. Yes, there are logs. Right now, we log remote ip, referer, execution type, kernel id, and the code text: https://gi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

Yo ! > I agree. O_O God. This caught me off guard O_O > Still, even with your branch the text starts with "This is the reference manual". Well it better be since there is a big fat "Reference Manual" headline. I just pushed this : --- This is a thematic index of all of `Sage's

[sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

I agree. Still, even with your branch the text starts with "This is the reference manual". Well it better be since there is a big fat "Reference Manual" headline. How about we move the whole text into a separate "Foreword" menu item. On Friday, June 6, 2014 1:19:24 PM UTC+1, Nathann Cohen w

[sage-devel] Re: Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

(when the branch is applied : http://www.steinertriples.fr/ncohen/tmp/a.jpg) Nathann On 6 June 2014 14:19, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello everybody ! > > I was looking at http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/ while preparing a > short introductive talk to Sage aaand I thought that t

[sage-devel] Making the reference manual's introduction more concise

Hello everybody ! I was looking at http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/ while preparing a short introductive talk to Sage aaand I thought that the "introduction" to the reference manual missed the point a bit... What is says is good to be said, but I felt that it rather belong to Sa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Please review Python 2.7.6 update

Bump Note that ticket is now about Python 2.7.7 update On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 10:32:57 PM UTC+1, François wrote: > > I am sorry, I don't think I have the foo for #16415 otherwise it would > have been done sometime ago. > > Francois > > On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:00:26 Volker Braun wrote: > > Ju

[sage-devel] Re: Seattle Questions

On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 20:58:55 you wrote: > Do I need to book a hotel or can we stay at the house? You will need to book a hotel room, see: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bugdays/FhB7gi1JY80 You should also subscribe to that list to stay in the loop. > Is there anyone who could ge